As teams have become an increasingly necessary component of organizational structure, organizations have turned to team development interventions in hopes of facilitating performance gains in their teams. However, it is critical to understand that team development interventions are not “one size fits all.” This review provides a close examination of the two most prevalent intervention approaches, team training and team building, in order to highlight their contributions to improving teams when designed according to team development science.
BullerP.F.BellC.H.Jr. (1986). Effects of team building and goal setting on productivity: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 305–328.
3.
Cannon-BowersJ.A.BowersC. (2010). Team development and functioning. In ZedeckS. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 597–650).Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4.
Cannon-BowersJ.A.TannenbaumS.I.SalasE.VolpeC.E. (1995). Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In GuzzoR.SalasE., & Associates (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 333–380). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
ConnaughtonS.L.ShufflerM. (2007). Multinational and multicultural distributed teams: A review and future agenda. Small Group Research, 38, 387–412.
6.
DeChurchL.BurkeC.S.ShufflerM.L.LyonsR.DotyD.SalasE. (2011). A historiometric analysis of leadership in mission critical multiteam environments. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 152–169.
7.
DeliseL.GormanC.A.BrooksA.M.RentschJ.R.Steele-JohnsonD. (2010). The effects of team training on team outcomes: A meta-analysis. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 22, 53–80.
8.
DyerW.G. (2007). Team building: Proven strategies for improving team performance. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
9.
EntinE.SerfatyD. (1999). Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors, 41, 312–325.
10.
HollenbeckJ.R.DeRueD.S.GuzzoR. (2004). Bridging the gap between I/O research and HR practice: Improving team composition, team training, and team task design. Human Resource Management, 43, 353–366.
11.
KleinC.DiazGranadosD.SalasE.LeH.BurkeC.S.LyonsR.GoodwinG.F. (2009). Does team building work?Small Group Research, 40, 181–222.
12.
KozlowskiS.W.J.KleinK.J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In KleinK.J.KozlowskiS.W.J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
MarksM.A.ZaccaroS.J.MathieuJ.E. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 971–986.
National Transportation Safety Board. (2010). Loss of thrust in both engines after encountering a flock of birds and subsequent ditching on the Hudson river, US Airways Flight 1549, Airbus A320-214, N106US, Weehawken, New Jersey, January 15, 2009 (Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-10 /03). Washington, DC: Author.
16.
NeilyJ.A.MillsP.D.Young-XuY.CarneyB.T.WestP.BergerD.H.. . . BagianJ.P. (2010). Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 304, 1693–1700.
17.
SalasE.BurkeC.S.BowersC.A.WilsonK.A. (2001). Team training in the skies: Does crew resource management (CRM) training work?Human Factors, 43, 641–674.
18.
SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ.A. (1997). Methods, tools, and strategies for team training. In QuinonesM.A.EhrensteinA. (Eds.), Training for a rapidly changing workplace: Applications of psychological research (pp. 249–280). Washington, DC: APA.
19.
SalasE.CookeN.J.RosenM.A. (2008). On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50, 540. doi:10.1518/001872008X28845710.1518/001872008X288457
20.
SalasE.DiazGranadosD.KleinC.BurkeC.S.StaglK.C.GoodwinG.F.HalpinS.M. (2008). Does team training improve team performance? A meta-analysis. Human Factors, 50, 903–933.
21.
SalasE.NicholsD.R.DriskellJ.E. (2007). Testing three team training strategies in intact teams: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 38, 471–488.
22.
SalasE.RosenM.BurkeS.GoodwinG. (2009). The wisdom of collectives in organizations: An update of team competencies. In SalasE.GoodwinG.BurkeS. (Eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations (pp. 39–79). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
23.
SalasE.RozellD.MullenB.DriskellJ.E. (1999). The effect of team building on performance: An integration. Small Group Research, 30, 309–329.
24.
Smith-JentschK.Cannon-BowersJ.TannenbaumS.SalasE. (2008). Guided team self-correction: Impacts on team mental models, processes, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39, 303–327.
25.
VaughanD. (1996). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
VickK. (2008, April13). Team-building or torture? Court will decide. Washington Post. Available from www.washingtonpost.com
27.
VolpeC.Cannon-BowersJ.SalasE.SpectorP. (1996). The impact of cross-training on team functioning: An empirical investigation. Human Factors, 38, 87–100.