Links Between Attention,Performance Pressure,and Movement in Skilled Motor Action

Abstract

The attentional focus adopted during the execution of a skilled motor action can have a profound effect on performance outcomes. Furthermore, it has been proposed that an “inward” shift in the focus of attention may be one of the primary causes of “choking under pressure.” But how does attention have its effect on performance? In particular, how does changing one’s focus of attention change movement during skill execution? Here, I highlight recent research reporting four different types of movement effects that have been linked to attention: movement variability, multi-joint coordination, movement economy, and motor-control strategy. Understanding the effects of attention and pressure at the level of kinematics/muscle activity is crucial for developing a comprehensive theoretical account of skilled motor action. It is also of great practical value as it identifies specific execution errors that can be addressed in practice.

Keywords

attention action kinematics pressure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beilock

S.L.

Carr

T.H.

(2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 701–725.

Beilock

S.L.

Gray

(2007). Why do athletes “choke” under pressure? In Tenenbaum

Eklund

(Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 425–444). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Beilock

S.L.

Gray

(in press). From attentional control to attentional spillover: A skill-level investigation of attention, kinematic, and performance outcome relations. Human Movement Science.

Bernstein

N.A.

(1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. Oxford, UK: Permagon Press.

Cooke

Kavussanu

McIntyre

Ring

(2010). Psychological, muscular and kinematic factors mediate performance under pressure. Psychophysiology, 47, 1109–1118.

Coombes

S.A.

Higgins

Gamble

K.M.

Cauraugh

J.H.

Janelle

C.M.

(2009). Attentional control theory: Anxiety, emotion, and motor planning. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 1072–1079.

Delay

Nougier

Orliaguet

J.-P.

Coello

(1997). Movement control in golf putting. Human Movement Science, 16, 597–619.

Gray

(2002). Behavior of college baseball players in a virtual batting task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 1131–1148.

Gray

(2004). Attending to the execution of a complex sensorimotor skill: Expertise differences, choking and slumps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 42–54.

10.

Lee

D.N.

Lishman

J.R.

Thompson

J.A.

(1982). Regulation of gait in long jumping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 449–459.

11.

Lohse

K.R.

Sherwood

D.E.

Healy

A.F.

(2010). How changing the focus of attention affects performance, kinematics and electromyography in dart throwing. Human Movement Science, 29, 542–555.

12.

Masters

R.S.W.

(1992). Knowledge, knerves and know-how—The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 343–358.

13.

Oudejans

R.R.D.

Kuijpers

Kooiman

C.C.

Bakker

F.C.

(2011). Thoughts and attention of athletes under pressure: Skill-focus or performance worries? Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 24, 59–73.

14.

Pijpers

J.R.

Oudejans

R.R.D.

Holsheimer

Bakker

F.C.

(2003). Anxiety-performance relationships in climbing: A process-oriented approach. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4, 283–304.

15.

Wulf

Prinz

(2001). Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 648–660.

16.

Zachary

Wulf

Mercer

Bezodis

(2005). Increased movement accuracy and reduced EMG activity as the result of adopting an external focus of attention. Brain Research Bulletin, 67, 304–307.