Life is full of risky decisions, from the mundane to matters of life or death.
Individuals differ in the risks they accept (or even deliberately embrace). However,
risk taking is not a single trait but is a behavior influenced by characteristics of
the situation (what the decision is about and to what extent it engages affect vs.
deliberation), the decision maker (age and gender), and interactions between
situation and decision maker. Understanding the mechanisms behind risk taking—or
who takes risks when and why—is
particularly important when the goal is to influence and modify the behavior.
BlaisA.R.WeberE.U. (2006). A domain-specific ris-taking
(DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and
Decision Making, 1,
33–47.
2.
BoyerT.W. (2006). The development of risk-taking: a
multi-perspective review.Developmental Review, 26,
291–345.
3.
BurnettS.BaultN.CoricelliG.BlakemoreS.J. (2010). Adolescents’ heightened
risk-seeking in a probabilistic gambling task. Cognitive
Development, 25,
183–196.
4.
ByrnesJ.P.MillerD.C.SchaferW.D. (1999). Gender differences in risk
taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,
125, 367–383.
5.
ErnstM.FudgeJ.L. (2009). A developmental neurobiological
model of motivated behavior: Anatomy, connectivity, and ontogeny of the triadic
nodes. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews,
33, 367–382.
6.
FignerB.KnochD.JohnsonE.J.KroschA.R.LisanbyS.H.FehrE.. (2010). Lateral prefrontal cortex and
self-control in intertemporal choice. Nature
Neuroscience, 13,
538–539.
7.
FignerB.MackinlayR.J.WilkeningF.WeberE.U. (2009a). Affective and deliberative
processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card
Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 35,
709–730.
8.
FignerB.MackinlayR.J.WilkeningF.WeberE.U. (2009b, April). Risky choice in
children, adolescents, and adults: Affective versus deliberative processes and the
role of executive functions. Paper presented at the Society
for Research in Child Development, Denver,
CO.
9.
FignerB.MurphyR.O. (2011). Using skin conductance in
judgment and decision making research. In Schulte-MecklenbeckM.KuehbergerA.RanyardR. (Eds.), A handbook of process tracing methods for decision
research (pp. 163–184). New
York, NY: Psychology
Press.
10.
FignerB.VoelkiN. (2004). Risky decision making in a
computer card game: An information integration experiment.
Polish Psychological Bulletin, 35,
135–139.
11.
GardnerM.SteinbergL. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking,
risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An
experimental study. Developmental Psychology,
41, 625–635.
12.
GladwinT.E.FignerB.CroneE.A.WiersR.W. (in press). Addiction, adolescence, and the
integration of control and motivation. Developmental Cognitive
Neuroscience.
13.
HanochY.JohnsonJ.G.WilkeA. (2006). Domain specificity in
experimental measures and participant recruitment.
Psychological Science, 17,
300–304.
14.
HarrisonJ.D.YoungJ.M.ButowP.SalkeldG.SolomonM.J. (2005). Is it worth the risk? A
systematic review of instruments that measure risk propensity for use in the
health setting. Social Science & Medicine,
60, 1385–1396.
15.
JianakoplosN.A.BernasekA. (1998). Are women more risk
averse?Economic Inquiry, 36,
620–630.
16.
LoewensteinG.WeberE.U.HseeC.K.WelchN. (2001). Risk as feelings.
Psychological Bulletin, 127,
267–286.
17.
MetcalfeJ.MischelW. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of
delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower.
Psychological Review, 106,
3–19.
18.
PetersE.VastfjallD.GarlingT.SlovicP. (2006). Affect and decision making: A
“hot” topic. Journal of Behavioral Decision
Making, 19,
79–85.
19.
ReynaV.F.FarleyF. (2006). Risk and rationality in
adolescent decision making: Implications for theory, practice, and public
policy. Psychological Science in the Public
Interest, 7,
1–44.
20.
SchonbergT.FoxC. R.PoldrackR. A. (2010). Mind the gap: bridging economic
and naturalistic risk-taking with cognitive neuroscience.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15,
11–19.
21.
SomervilleL.H.JonesR.M.CaseyB.J. (2010). A time of change: Behavioral and
neural correlates of adolescent sensitivity to appetitive and aversive
environmental cues. Brain and Cognition,
72, 124–133.
22.
SteinbergL. (2010). A dual systems model of
adolescent risk taking. Developmental
Psychobiology, 52,
216–224.
23.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1992). Advances in prospect theory:
Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk
and Uncertainty, 5,
297–323.
24.
van DuijvenvoordeA.C.JansenB.R.VisserI.HuizengaH.M. (2010). Affective and cognitive
decision-making in adolescents. Developmental
Neuropsychology, 35,
539–554.
WeberE.U.BlaisA.R.BetzN.E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude
scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors.
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15,
263–290.
27.
WeberE.U.HseeC.K. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in
risk perception but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived
risk. Management Science, 44,
1205–1217.
28.
WeberE.U.JohnsonE.J. (2008). Decisions under uncertainty:
Psychological, economic, and neuroeconomic explanations of risk
preference. In GlimcherP. W.CamererC. F.FehrE.PoldrackR.A. (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the
brain (pp. 127–144).
London: Elsevier Academic
Press.
29.
WeberE.U.JohnsonE.J. (2009). Mindful judgment and
decision-making. Annual Review of Psychology,
60, 53–85.
30.
WeberE.U.SiebenmorgenN.WeberM. (2005). Communicating asset risk: How
name recognition and the format of historic volatility information affect risk
perception and investment decisions. Risk
Analysis, 25,
597–609.
31.
WellerJ. A.LevinI. P.BecharaA. (2010). Do individual differences in Iowa
Gambling Task performance predict adaptive decision making for risky gains and
losses?Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology,
32, 141–150.
