Recent as well as historical critiques of association theory, which is based on
automatic linking mechanisms, lead to a consideration of an alternative: organization
theory. The latter theory postulates that human memory is organized, instead, in a
nested, hierarchical fashion that structures storage and retrieval. Organization
theory also postulates that there is a limit of four expandable units in organized
memory and that the same limit is found in recall and production units.
AschS.E. (1969). A reformulation of the problem of
association. American Psychologist,
24, 92–102.
2.
AschS.E.EbenholtzS.M. (1962). The principle of associative
symmetry. Proceedings of the American Philosophical
Society, 106,
135–163.
3.
AtkinsonR.C.ShiffrinR.M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system
and its control processes. In SpenceK.W.SpenceJ.T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation.
New York, NY: Academic
Press.
4.
BaddeleyA.D.HitchG. (1974). Working memory.
In BowerG.H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation.
New York, NY: Academic
Press.
5.
BousfieldW.A. (1953). The occurrence of clustering in
the recall of randomly arranged associates. Journal of
General Psychology, 49,
229–240.
6.
BousfieldW.A.SedgewickC.H.W. (1944). An analysis of sequences of
restricted associative responses. Journal of General
Psychology, 30,
149–165.
7.
BowerG.H. (1970). Organizational factors in
memory. Cognitive Psychology, 1,
18–46.
8.
BowerG.H.BryantD.J. (1991). On relating the organizational
theory of memory to levels of processing. In KessenW.OrtonyA.CraikF. (Eds.), Memories, thoughts, and emotions: Essays in honor of
George Mandler (pp. 149–168).
Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
9.
BroadbentD.E. (1971). The magic number seven after
fifteen years. In KennedyA.WilkesA. (Eds.), Studies in long-term memory (pp.
2–18). New York:
Wiley.
10.
CareyS. (2009). The origin of concepts.
New York, NY: Oxford University
Press.
11.
CowanN. (2001). The magical number 4 in
short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24,
87–185.
12.
CraikF.I.M.LockhartR.S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework
for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behavior, 11,
671–684.
13.
De HouwerJ. (2009). The propositional approach to
associative learning as an alternative for association formation
models. Learning & Behavior,
37, 1–20.
14.
DickinsonA. (2001). The 28th Bartlett memorial
lecture: Causal learning—an associative analysis.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
54B, 3–25.
15.
DorfmanJ. (1999). Unitization of sublexical
components in implicit memory for novel words.
Psychological Science, 10,
387–392.
16.
GarnerW.R. (1962). Uncertainty and structure as
psychological concepts. New York, NY:
Wiley.
17.
GarnerW.R. (1966). To perceive is to
know. American Psychologist, 21,
11–19.
18.
GraesserA.C.MandlerG. (1978). Limited processing capacity
constrains the storage of unrelated sets of words and retrieval from natural
categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Learning and Memory, 4,
86–100.
19.
JenkinsJ.J.RussellW.A. (1952). Associative clustering during
recall. Journal of Abnormal & Social
Psychology, 47,
818–821.
20.
KatonaG. (1940). Organizing and memorizing.
New York, NY: Columbia University
Press.
21.
LarsenD.P.ButlerA.C.RoedigerH.L. (2009). Repeated testing improves
long-term retention relative to repeated study: A randomized controlled
trial. Medical Education, 43,
1174–1181.
22.
LuckS.J.VogelE.K. (1997). The capacity of visual working
memory for features and conjunctions. Nature,
390, 279–281.
23.
MandlerG. (1962). From association to
structure. Psychological Review,
69, 415–427.
24.
MandlerG. (1967). Organization and
memory. In SpenceK.W.SpenceJ.T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances
in research and theory (pp. 328–372).
New York, NY: Academic
Press.
MandlerG. (1979). Organization, memory, and mental
structures. In PuffC.R. (Ed.), Memory organization and structure.
New York, NY: Academic
Press.
27.
MandlerG. (2002). Organization: What levels of
processing are levels of. Memory,
10, 333–338.
28.
MandlerG.PearlstoneZ. (1966). Free and constrained concept
learning and subsequent recall. Journal of Verbal Learning
and Verbal Behavior, 5,
126–131.
29.
MandlerG.RabinowitzJ.C.SimonR.A. (1981). Coordinate organization: The
holistic representation of word pairs. American Journal of
Psychology, 94,
209–222.
30.
MandlerG.WordenP.E.GraesserA.C.I. (1974). Subjective disorganization:
Search for the locus of list organization. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13,
220–235.
31.
MandlerJ.M. (1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of
schema theory. Hillsdale, N.J.:
Erlbaum.
32.
MandlerJ.M. (2004). Foundations of mind: The origins of
conceptual thought. New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
33.
MillerG.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or
minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Psychological Review, 63,
81–97.
34.
MitchellC.J.De HouwerJ.LovibondP.F. (2009). The propositional nature of human
associative learning. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 32,
183–198.
35.
MüllerG.E. (1911–1917). Zur Analyse der
Gedächtnistätigkeit und des Vorstellungverlaufes.
Zeitschrift fürPsychologie, Ergänzungsband, 5,
8,9.
36.
PashlerH.RohrerD.CepedaN.CarpenterS. (2007). Enhancing learning and retarding
forgetting: Choices and consequences. Psychonomic Bulletin
& Review, 14,
187–193.
37.
RoedigerH.L.AgarwalP.K.KangS.H.K.MarshE. J. (2010). Benefits of testing memory: Best
practices and boundary conditions. In DaviesG.M.WrightD.B. (Eds.), Current issues in applied memory research. Current
issues in memory (pp. 13–49).
New York, NY: Psychology
Press.
38.
ShimmerlikS.M. (1978). Organization theory and memory
for prose: A review of the literature. Review of
Educational Research, 48,
103–120.
39.
SquireL.R.KnowltonB.MusenG. (1993). The structure and organization of
memory. Annual Review of Psychology,
44, 453–495.
40.
TulvingE. (1962). Subjective organization in free
recall of “unrelated” words. Psychological
Review, 69,
344–354.
41.
TulvingE. (1995). Organization of memory: Quo
vadis? In GazzanigaM.S. (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp.
839–853). Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
42.
ZarombF.M.RoedigerH.L. (2010). The testing effect in free recall
is associated with enhanced organizational processes.
Memory & Cognition, 38,
995–1008.
