When individuals make decisions, they tend to prefer information that is consistent with their choices over information that is inconsistent with their choices. This phenomenon is known as selective exposure to confirmatory information, and it has been shown to detrimentally affect the quality of decision outcomes. In this article, we review the most important recent findings on the determinants of this phenomenon, highlight its potential real-life consequences for decision makers and their judgments, and propose a theoretical model that is able to integrate a variety of inconsistent findings in selective exposure research.
AlbarracinD.MitchellA.L. (2004). The role of defensive confidence in preference for proattitudinal information: How believing that one is strong can sometimes be a defensive weakness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1565–1584.
2.
ChaikenS.LibermanA.EaglyA.H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In UlemanJ.S.BarghJ.A. (Eds.), Unintended thought: Limits of awareness, intention, and control (pp. 212–252). New York, NY: Guilford.
3.
DittoP.H.LopezD.F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568–584.
4.
DittoP.H.ScepanskyJ.A.MunroG.D.ApanovitchA.M.LockhartL.K. (1998). Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 53–69.
5.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
FischerP.FischerJ.AydinN.FreyD. (in press). Physically attractive social information sources lead to increased selective exposure to Information. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,
7.
FischerP.FischerJ.WeisweilerS.FreyD. (in press). Selective exposure to information: How different modes of decision making affect subsequent confirmatory information processing. British Journal of Social Psychology,
8.
FischerP.GreitemeyerT.FreyD. (2008). Self-regulation and selective exposure: The impact of depleted self-regulation resources on confirmatory information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 382–395.
9.
FischerP.JonasE.FreyD.KastenmüllerA. (2008). Selective exposure and decision framing: The impact of gain and loss framing on biased information seeking after decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
10.
FischerP.JonasE.FreyD.Schulz-HardtS. (2005). Selective exposure to information: The impact of information limits. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 469–492.
11.
FischerP.KastenmüllerA.GreitemeyerT.FischerJ.FreyD.CrelleyD. (in press). Threat and selective exposure: The moderating role of threat and decision context on confirmatory information search after decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
12.
FischerP.Schulz-HardtS.FreyD. (2008). Selective exposure and information quantity: How different information quantities moderate decision makers' preference for consistent and inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 231–244.
13.
FreyD. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 41–80). Vol. 19, New York, NY: Academic Press.
14.
GreitemeyerT.FischerP.FreyD.Schulz-HardtS. (2009). Biased assimilation: The role of source position. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 22–39.
15.
GreitemeyerT.Schulz-HardtS. (2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 322–339.
16.
GreitemeyerT.Schulz-HardtS.BrodbeckF.FreyD. (2006). Information sampling and group decision making: The effects of an advocacy procedure and task experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 31–42.
17.
HartW.AlbarracinD.EaglyA.H.BrechanI.LindbergM.J.MerrillL. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 555–588.
KastenmüllerA.FischerP.JonasE.GreitemeyerT.FreyD.KöpplJ.AydinN. (2010). Selective exposure: The impact of framing information search instructions as gains and losses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 837–846.
20.
KastenmüllerA.GreitemeyerT.JonasE.FischerP.FreyD. (in press). Selective exposure: The Impact of collectivism and individualism. British Journal of Social Psychology,
21.
KrayL.J.GalinskyA.D. (2003). The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 362–377.
22.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
23.
LordC.G.RossL.LepperM.R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.
24.
Report on the U.S. Intelligence Community's Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq. (July9, 2004). Washington, DC: United States Select Senate Committee on Intelligence. Retrieved fromhttp://intelligence.senate.gov
25.
Schulz-HardtS.FreyD.JonasE.
(2001). Wahrheitssuche statt Wunschdenken: Eine kognitive Alternativerklärung für konfirmatorische Informationsselektion [Accuracy search instead of wishful thinking: A cognitive alternative account for confirmatory information search]. In SilbereisenR.K.ReitzleM. (Eds.), Psychologie 2000–Bericht über den 42. Kongreβ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Jena 2000 (pp. 674–684). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst.
