The literature on insight lists four main characteristics of this experience: (a) suddenness (the experience is surprising and immediate), ease (the solution is processed without difficulty), positive affect (insights are gratifying), and the feeling of being right (after an insight, problem solvers judge the solution as being true and have confidence in this judgment). Although this phenomenology is well known, no theory has explained why insight feels the way it does. We propose a fluency account of insight: Positive affect and perceived truth and confidence in one’s own judgment are triggered by the sudden appearance of the solution for a problem and the concomitant surprising fluency gain in processing. We relate earlier evidence on insight concerning the impact of sudden fluency variations on positive affect and perceived truth and confidence.
BenjaminA.S.BjorkR.A.SchwartzB.L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55–68.
2.
GickM.L.LockhartR.S. (1995). Cognitive and affective components of insight. In SternbergR.J.DavidsonJ.E. (Eds.), The Nature of insight. (pp. 197–228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
GruberH.E. (1995). Insight and affect in the history of science. In SternbergR.J.DavidsonJ.E. (Eds.), The Nature of Insight. (pp. 397–431). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
HansenJ.DechêneA.WänkeM. (2008). Discrepant fluency increases subjective truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 687–691.
5.
KelleyC.M.LindsayD.S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 1–24.
6.
KoriatA.Levy-SadotR. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 34–53.
7.
KouniosJ.BeemanM. (2009). Aha! The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 210–216.
8.
MetcalfeJ.WiebeD. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15, 238–246.
PoincaréH (1996). Science and Method. London, England: Routledge/Thoemess Press.(Original work published 1913).
11.
ReberR.SchwarzN. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 338–342.
12.
ReberR.SchwarzN.WinkielmanP. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382.
13.
RhodesM.G.CastelA.D. (2008). Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: Evidence for metacognitive illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 615–625.
14.
TopolinskiS.LikowskiK.U.WeyersP.StrackF. (2009). The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 260–271.
15.
TopolinskiSReberR. (2010). Immediate truth: Temporal contiguity between a cognitive problem and its solution determines experienced veracity of the solution. Cognition, 114, 117–122.
16.
TopolinskiS.StrackF. (2009a). Scanning the “fringe” of consciousness: What is felt and what is not felt in intuitions about semantic coherence. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 608–618.
17.
TopolinskiS.StrackF. (2009b). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence, and of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 39–63.
18.
UnkelbachC. (2007). Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 219–230.
19.
WhittleseaB.W.A.WilliamsL.D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don’t? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. Acta Psychologica, 98, 141–165.
20.
WinkielmanP.CacioppoJ.T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation leads to positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 989–1000.
