Examining media coverage of ethical dimensions of advanced algorithmic technology

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science into daily life raises ethical concerns and stimulates discussions among stakeholders responsible for their development. Given the media’s role in shaping imaginaries of emerging technologies and their acceptance, this paper systematically analyzes media discourse on ethics in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science from 2015 to 2020. Our results show that media coverage of advanced algorithmic technologies mainly focused on the industry sector, frequently addressing short-term challenges such as algorithmic bias, social justice, data privacy, and socioeconomic effects. Its portrayal in media often maintained a balanced perspective between positive and negative outcomes, paired with realistic and grounded future scenarios. This study offers a holistic and integrated analysis of how the media frames the ethics of artificial intelligence, data science, and machine learning, highlighting previously overlooked dimensions such as accountability strategies and the relationship between areas of application and their consequences.

Keywords

artificial intelligence data science emerging technologies ethics machine learning media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amodei

Olah

Steinhardt

Christiano

Schulman

Mané

(2016) Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv. Epub ahead of print 25 July 2016. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1606.06565.

Bakiner

(2023) What do academics say about artificial intelligence ethics? An overview of the scholarship. AI Ethics 3: 513–525.

Barn

(2019) Mapping the public debate on ethical concerns: Algorithms in mainstream media. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 18(1): 124–139.

Bélisle-Pipon

Monteferrante

Roy

Couture

(2022) Artificial intelligence ethics has a black box problem. AI & Society 38(4): 1507–1522.

Boddington

(2017) What do we need to understand about ethics? In: O’Sullivan

Wooldridge

(eds) Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence (by P Boddington). Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 7–26.

Buntain

Liebler

Webster

(2023) Database use, database discrepancies: Implications for content analyses of news. Newspaper Research Journal 44(4): 409–424.

Burton

(2020) Public sector lacks openness and transparency in the use of AI and machine learning, warns official report. Computing. Available at: https://advance.lexis.com/api/document?collection=news&id=urn%3acontentItem%3a5Y63-4R91-JCDG-R259-00000-00&context=1519360&identityprofileid=QQTRN251671

Chuan

Tsai

WHS

Cho

(2019) Framing artificial intelligence in American newspapers. In: Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, January 2019. ACM, 339–344.

Cools

Van Gorp

Opgenhaffen

(2024) Where exactly between utopia and dystopia? A framing analysis of AI and automation in US newspapers. Journalism 25(1): 3–21.

10.

Curtis

(2015) Google Photos labels black people as “gorillas.” The Telegraph, 30 June. Available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/11710136/Google-Photos-assigns-gorilla-tag-to-photos-of-black-people.html#:~:text=launched%20in%20May-,Google%20has%20removed%20the%20’gorilla’%20tag%20from%20its%20new%20Photos,generated%20album%20named%20’gorillas‘

11.

Dandurand

McKelvey

Roberge

(2023) Freezing out: Legacy media’s shaping of AI as a cold controversy. Big Data & Society 10(2). DOI: 10.1177/20539517231219242.

12.

Datta

Tschantz

Datta

(2014) Automated experiments on ad privacy settings: A tale of opacity, choice, and discrimination. arXiv. Epub ahead of print 17 March 2015. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1408.6491.

13.

EY India (2023) How India is emerging as the world’s technology and services hub. EY. Available at: https://www.ey.com/en_in/india-at-100/how-india-is-emerging-as-the-world-s-technology-and-services-hub

14.

Fast

Horvitz

(2017) Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 31(1): 963–969.

15.

Goddin

(2009) Closeted lesbian sues Netflix for privacy invasion. The Register. Available at: https://www.theregister.com/2009/12/21/netflix_privacy_flap/

16.

Gourlet

Ricci

Crépel

(2024) Reclaiming artificial intelligence accounts: A plea for a participatory turn in artificial intelligence inquiries. Big Data & Society 11(2). DOI: 10.1177/20539517241248093.

17.

Hagendorff

(2020) The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds and Machines 30(1): 99–120.

18.

Hall

Ellis

(2023) A systematic review of socio-technical gender bias in AI algorithms. Online Information Review 47(7): 1264–1279.

19.

Hansen

(2022) Public AI imaginaries: How the debate on artificial intelligence was covered in Danish newspapers and magazines 1956-2021. Nordicom Review 43(1): 56-78. DOI: 10.2478/nor-2022-0004.

20.

Happer

Philo

(2013) The role of the media in the construction of public belief and social change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 1(1): 321–336.

21.

Hilgartner

(2018) The human genome project and the legacy of its ethics programs. In: Gibbon

Prainsack

Hilgartner

Lamoreaux

(eds) Routledge Handbook of Genomics, Health and Society. London: Routledge, pp. 123–132.

22.

Horowitz

(2019) When speed kills: Lethal autonomous weapon systems, deterrence and stability. Journal of Strategic Studies 42(6): 764–788.

23.

Jobin

Ienca

Vayena

(2019) The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence 1(9): 389–399.

24.

Jordan

Mitchell

(2015) Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349(6245): 255–260.

25.

Kanaga

(2020) AI and the world of estate planning. Wealth Management, January 24. Available at: https://advance.lexis.com/api/document?collection=news&id=urn%3acontentItem%3a5Y27-6P41-DY2V-D24B-00000-00&context=1519360&identityprofileid=QQTRN251671

26.

Kazim

Koshiyama

(2021) A high-level overview of AI ethics. Patterns 2(9): 1–12.

27.

Koopman

(2018) How democracy can survive big data. The New York Times, 22 March. Available at: https://advance.lexis.com/api/document?collection=news&id=urn%3acontentItem%3a5RY9-YV51-DXY4-X3JV-00000-00&context=1519360&identityprofileid=QQTRN251671

28.

Köstler

Ossewaarde

(2022) The making of AI society: AI futures frames in German political and media discourses. AI & Society 37(1): 249–263.

29.

Krippendorff

(2018) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

30.

Lambrecht

Tucker

(2019) Algorithmic bias? An empirical study of apparent gender-based discrimination in the display of STEM career ads. Management Science 65(7): 2966–2981.

31.

Laux

Wachter

Mittelstadt

(2024) Three pathways for standardization and ethical disclosure by default under the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act. Computer Law & Security Review 53: 105957.

32.

Lecheler

de Vreese

(2019) News Framing Effects. London: Taylor & Francis.

33.

Leiter

Zhang

Chen

Belouadi

Larionov

Fresen

, et al. (2024) ChatGPT: A meta-analysis after 2.5 months. Machine Learning with Applications 16: 100541.

34.

Leonelli

(2016) Locating ethics in data science: Responsibility and accountability in global and distributed knowledge production systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374(2083): 20160122.

35.

Levy

Madrigal

Vaickus

(2023) Artificial intelligence: Applications in clinical medicine. Frontiers in Medical Technology 5: 1206969.

36.

Lupo

(2022) The ethics of artificial intelligence: An analysis of ethical frameworks disciplining AI in justice and other contexts of application. Socio-Legal Series 12(3): 614–653.

37.

Lyapustina

(2018) New initiative examines ethics of research using ‘pervasive’ data. Discerning Data, 7 March. Available at: https://www.discerningdata.com/2018/new-initiative-examines-ethics-research-using-pervasive-data/

38.

McCombs

Shaw

(1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. The Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2): 176–187.

39.

Mager

Katzenbach

(2021) Future imaginaries in the making and governing of digital technology: Multiple, contested, commodified. New Media & Society 23(2): 223-236.

40.

Mager

Eitenberger

Winter

Prainsack

Wendehorst

Arora

(2025) Situated ethics: Ethical accountability of local perspectives in global AI ethics. Media, Culture & Society 47(5): 1028–1041.

41.

Munn

(2023) The uselessness of AI ethics. AI and Ethics 3(3): 869–877.

42.

Nguyen

Hekman

(2024) The news framing of artificial intelligence: A critical exploration of how media discourses make sense of automation. AI & Society 39(2): 437–451.

43.

Ouchchy

Coin

Dubljević

(2020) AI in the headlines: The portrayal of the ethical issues of artificial intelligence in the media. AI & Society 35: 927–936.

44.

Parra

Gupta

Dennehy

(2021) Likelihood of questioning AI-based recommendations due to perceived racial/gender bias. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society 3(1): 41–45.

45.

Roe

Perkins

(2023) What they’re not telling you about ChatGPT: Exploring the discourse of AI in UK news media headlines. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10(1): 1–9.

46.

Saltz

Dewar

Heckman

(2018) Key concepts for a data science ethics curriculum. In: Proceedings of the 49th ACM technical symposium on computer science education, Baltimore, MA, 21–24 February 2018, pp. 952–957. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

47.

Schiff

Biddle

Borenstein

Laas

(2020) What’s next for AI ethics, policy, and governance? A global overview. In: Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM conference on AI, ethics, and society, New York, 7–9 February 2020, pp. 153–158. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

48.

Schober

Boer

Schwarte

(2018) Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia 126(5): 1763–1768.

49.

Sham

Aktas

Rizhinashvili

Kuklianov

Alisinanoglu

Ofodile

, et al. (2023) Ethical AI in facial expression analysis: Racial bias. Signal, Image and Video Processing 17(2): 399–406.

50.

Siau

Wang

(2020) Artificial intelligence (AI) ethics: Ethics of AI and ethical AI. Journal of Database Management (JDM) 31(2): 74–87.

51.

Stahl

Wright

(2018) Ethics and privacy in AI and big data: Implementing responsible research and innovation. IEEE Security & Privacy 16(3): 26–33.

52.

Stamboliev

Christiaens

(2025) How empty is trustworthy AI? A discourse analysis of the ethics guidelines of trustworthy AI. Critical Policy Studies 19(1): 39–56.

53.

Stinson

(2018) Deep learning: Why it’s time for AI to get philosophical. The Globe and Mail, 23 March. Available at: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-deep-learning-why-its-time-for-ai-to-get-philosophical/

54.

Sun

Zhai

Shen

Chen

(2020) Newspaper coverage of artificial intelligence: A perspective of emerging technologies. Telematics and Informatics 53: 101433.

55.

Suchman

(2023) The uncontroversial “thingness” of AI. Big Data & Society 10(2): 20539517231206794.

56.

Tacheva

Ramasubramanian

(2023) AI Empire: Unraveling the interlocking systems of oppression in generative AI’s global order. Big Data & Society 10(2): 20539517231219241.

57.

Toreini

Aitken

Coopamootoo

Elliott

Zelaya

Van Moorsel

(2020) The relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologies. In: Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness accountability and transparency, Barcelona, 27–30 January 2020, pp. 272–283. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

58.

Tractenberg

Russell

Morgan

FitzGerald

Collmann

Vinsel

, et al. (2015) Using ethical reasoning to amplify the reach and resonance of professional codes of conduct in training big data scientists. Science and Engineering Ethics 21: 1485–1507.

59.

University of Oxford (2022) US top of tech—enabled countries, but China and India among the fast movers—report. Available at: https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2022-11-15-us-top-tech-enabled-countries-china-and-india-among-fast-movers-report (accessed 26 June 2024).

60.

Van Dijk

Casiraghi

(2020) The “ethification” of privacy and data protection in the European Union: The case of artificial intelligence. Brussels Privacy Hub Working Paper, Brussels, May.

61.

Vesnic-Alujevic

Nascimento

Polvora

(2020) Societal and ethical impacts of artificial intelligence: Critical notes on European policy frameworks. Telecommunications Policy 44(6): 1–14.

62.

Washington

Kuo

(2020) Whose side are ethics codes on? Power, responsibility and the social good. In: Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness accountability and transparency, Barcelona, 27–30 January 2020, pp. 230–240. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

63.

Wei

Zhou

(2022) AI ethics issues in real world: Evidence from AI incident database. arXiv. Epub ahead of print 18 August 2022. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2206.07635.

64.

Williams

Onsman

Brown

(2010) Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 8: 1–13.

65.

Zhai

Yan

Zhang

(2020). Tracing the evolution of AI: conceptualization of artificial intelligence in mass media discourse. Information Discovery and Delivery 48(3): 137-149.

66.

Zhang

Dafoe

(2020) US public opinion on the governance of artificial intelligence. In: Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM conference on AI, ethics, and society, New York, 7–9 February 2020, pp. 187–193. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

67.

Zhang

Anderljung

Kahn

Dreksler

Horowitz

Dafoe

(2021) Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence: Evidence from a survey of machine learning researchers. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 71: 591–666.

68.

Zhang

(2015) Google photos tags two African-Americans as Gorillas through Facial Recognition Software. Forbes, 1 July. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/mzhang/2015/07/01/google-photos-tags-two-african-americans-as-gorillas-through-facial-recognition-software/?sh=7a16f6bd713d

69.

Zou

Schiebinger

(2018) AI can be sexist and racist—it’s time to make it fair. Nature. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05707-8

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.23 MB

0.00 MB