In economics, as in other domains, male experts are overrepresented in public debates. The underlying reason for this is unclear. A demand-side explanation is that female experts are less frequently asked to give their opinion; a supply-side explanation is that, conditional on being asked, female experts are less willing to give their opinion. Analysing an existing panel of expert economists, all asked for their opinions on a broad range of issues, we find evidence of a supply-side gap: male panel members are more likely to give an opinion, and this is the case in all fields of economics and on both in-field and out-of-field topics.
AlbækEChristiansenPMTogebyL (2003) Experts in the mass media: Researchers as sources in Danish daily newspapers, 1961–2001. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly80: 937–948.
2.
AuriolEFriebelGWeinbergerAWilhelmS (2022) Underrepresentation of women in the economics profession more pronounced in the United States compared to heterogeneous Europe. PNAS19(16): e2118853119.
3.
BarberBOdeanT (2001) Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics116(1): 261–292.
4.
Blair-LoyMRogersLEGlaserDWongYAbrahamDCosmanPC (2017) Gender in engineering departments: Are there gender differences in interruptions of academic job talks?Social Sciences6(1): 29.
5.
BoringA (2017) Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics145: 27–41.
6.
BrescollVL (2011) Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly56(4): 622–641.
7.
CeciSJGintherDKKahnSWilliamsWM (2014) Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest15(3): 75–141.
8.
ChariAGoldsmith-PinkhamP (2017) Gender representation in economics across topics and time: Evidence from the NBER summer institute. No. w23953. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
9.
ClancePRImesSA (1978) The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice15(3): 241–247.
10.
CoffmanK (2014) Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. The Quarterly Journal of Economics129(4): 1625–1660.
11.
CorreiaS (2017) REGHDFE: Stata module for linear and instrumental-variable/GMM regression absorbing multiple levels of fixed effects. Statistical Software Components S457874. Chestnut Hill, MA: Department of Economics, Boston College.
DoladoJJFelguerosoFAlmuniaM (2012) Are men and women-economists evenly distributed across research fields? Some new empirical evidence. Series3: 367–393.
14.
DupasPModestinoANiederleMWolfersJ (2021) Gender and the dynamics of economics seminars. NBER Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w28494
15.
ExleyCKesslerJ (2022) The gender gap in self-promotion. The Quarterly Journal of Economics137(3): 1345–1381.
16.
GardnerJWoolleyJT (2016) Measuring deliberative conditions: An analysis of participant freedom and equality in federal open market committee deliberation. Political Research Quarterly69(3): 594–605.
17.
GordonRDahlG (2013) Views among economists: Professional consensus or point-counterpoint?American Economic Review103(3): 629–635.
HirschmanDPopp BermanE (2014) Do economists make policies? On the political effects of economics. Socio-Economic Review12(4): 779–811.
20.
HowellLSingerJB (2017) Pushy or a princess? Women experts and British broadcast news. Journalism Practice11(9): 1062–1078.
21.
JarvisSNEbersoleCRNguyenCQZhuMKrayLJ (2022) Stepping up to the mic: Gender gaps in participation in live question-and-answer sessions at academic conferences. Psychological Science33(11): 1882–1893.
22.
JonesL (2020) Women’s Representation and Voice in Media Coverage of the Coronavirus Pandemic (The Global Institute for Women’s Leadership). London: King’s College London. Available at: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/giwl/assets/covid-media-analysis.pdf
23.
JørndrupHBentsenM (2016) Who Makes the News: Denmark – Global Media Monitoring Project 2015 National Report. Toronto, ON, Canada: World Association for Christian Communication.
24.
JoubertMGuentherLRademanL (2022) Expert voices in South African mass media during the COVID-19 pandemic. South African Journal of Science118(5–6): 12480.
25.
KitzingerJChimbaMDWilliamsAJHaranJBoyceT (2008) Gender, Stereotypes and Expertise in the Press: How Newspapers Represent Female and Male Scientists. Cardiff: UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology and Cardiff University.
26.
KruvandM (2012) The pill at fifty: How the New York Times covered the birth control pill, 1960–2010. American Journalism29: 34–67.
27.
LundebergMAFoxPWPunćcohaŕJ (1994) Highly confident but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments. Journal of Educational Psychology86(1): 114–121.
28.
MayAMcGarveyMHaplesRW (2014) Are disagreements among male and female economists marginal at best? A survey of AEA members and their views on economics. Contemporary Economic Policy32(1): 111–132.
29.
MayAMcGarveyMKuceraD (2018) Gender and European economic policy: A survey of the views of European economists on contemporary economic policy. Kyklos71(1): 162–183.
30.
MengelFSauermannJZolitzU (2019) Gender bias in teaching evaluations. Journal of the European Economic Association17: 535–566.
31.
NiederleMVesterlundL (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much?The Quarterly Journal of Economics122(3): 1067–1101.
32.
NiederleMVesterlundL (2011) Gender and competition. Annual Review of Economics3(1): 601–630.
33.
NiemiMPitkänenV (2017) Gendered use of experts in the media: Analysis of the gender gap in Finnish news journalism. Public Understanding of Science26(3): 355–368.
34.
SapienzaPZingalesL (2013) Expert economists versus average Americans. American Economic Review103(3): 636–642.
35.
SarsonsHXuG (2021) Confidence men? Evidence on confidence and gender among top economists. AEA Papers and Proceedings111: 65–68.
36.
SarsonsHGërxhaniKReubenESchramA (2021) Gender differences in recognition for group work. Journal of Political Economy129(1): 101–147.
37.
Thomas-HuntMCPhillipsKW (2004) When what you know is not enough: Expertise and gender dynamics in task groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin30(12): 1585–1598.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
