A proportion of the Australian public remains sceptical about the reality of climate change, its causes, impacts and the need for mitigatory action. To date, scepticism research largely focuses on factors highly resistant to change, particularly socio-demographic and value factors. This mixed-methods study investigated whether more malleable psychological factors: locus of control; information processing style; and anti-reflexivity, predicted climate change scepticism above and beyond socio-demographic and value factors. A sample of 390 participants (Mean age = 41.31, standard deviation = 18.72; 230 male) completed an electronic survey. Using hierarchical regression, trust in forces of anti-reflexivity and external locus of control predicted impact scepticism. Decreased trust in forces of reflexivity also predicted attribution and impact scepticism. Finally, external locus of control predicted response scepticism. Key qualitative themes identified were, trust in alternative science; mistrust of climate science; belief in natural cycles; predictions not becoming reality; and ulterior motives of interested parties.
AkterSBennettJWardMB (2012) Climate change scepticism and public support for mitigation: Evidence from an Australian choice experiment. Global Environmental Change22(3): 736–745.
BarelF (2012) Perceptual entitlement, reliabilism, and scepticism. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism2(1): 21–43.
4.
BergerSWyssAM (2021) Climate change denial is associated with diminished sensitivity in internalizing environmental externalities. Environmental Research Letters16(7): 074018.
5.
BertoldoRMaysCBöhmGPoortingaWPoumadèreMTvinnereimE, et al. (2019) Scientific truth or debate: On the link between perceived scientific consensus and belief in anthropogenic climate change. Public Understanding of Science28(7): 778–796.
6.
BetschTGlocknerA (2010) Intuition in judgement and decision making: Extensive thinking without effort. Psychological Inquiry21(4): 279–294.
7.
BloomfieldEFTilleryD (2019) The circulation of climate change denial online: Rhetorical and networking strategies on Facebook. Environmental Communication13(1): 23–34.
8.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
CampbellTHKayAC (2014) Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology107(5): 809–824.
11.
CapstickSPidgeonN (2014) What is climate change scepticism? Examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public. Global Environmental Change24: 389–401.
12.
CermakDPatockovaV (2020) Individual determinants of climate change scepticism in the Czech Republic. Sociologia52(6): 578–598.
13.
ClevelandMRoberstonJLVolkV (2020) Helping or hindering: Environmental locus of control, subjective enablers and constraints, and pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Cleaner Production249: 119394.
14.
ColemanRThorsonEJimenezCVintonK (2022) Reaching science skeptics: How adaptive framing of climate change leads to positive responses via persuasion knowledge and perceived behavioral control. Communication Research. Epub ahead of print 19 May. DOI: 10.1177/00936502221084925.
15.
ConnorLHHigginbothamN (2013) Natural cycles in lay understandings of climate change. Global Environmental Change23(6): 1852–1861.
16.
CornerAVenablesDSpenceAPoortingaWDemskiCPidgeonN (2011) Nuclear power, climate change and energy security: Exploring British public attitudes. Energy Policy39(9): 4823–4833.
17.
CruzSM (2017) The relationships of political ideology and party affiliation with environmental concern: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology53: 81–91.
18.
DavidsonDJStedmanRC (2018) Calling forth the change-makers: Reflexivity theory and climate change attitudes and behaviors. Acta Sociologica61(1): 79–94.
19.
DixonGHmielowskiJMaYN (2017) Improving climate change acceptance among us conservatives through value-based message targeting. Science Communication39(4): 520–534.
20.
DunlapRVan LiereKMertigAJonesR (2000) Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradism: A revised NEP scale. The Journal of Social Issues56(3): 425–442.
21.
EcklundEHScheitleCPPeiferJBolgerD (2017) Examining links between religion, evolution views, and climate change skepticism. Environment and Behavior49(9): 985–1006.
22.
EganPJMullinM (2017) Climate change: US public opinion. Annual Review of Political Science20: 209–227.
23.
EngelsAHutherOSchaferMHeldH (2013) Public climate-change skepticism, energy preferences and political participation. Global Environmental Change23(5): 1018–1027.
24.
EpsteinS (1994) Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist49(8): 709–724.
25.
EpsteinSPaciniRDenes-RajVHeierH (1996) Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71(2): 390–405.
26.
ErdfelderEFaulFBuchnerA (1996) GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers28(1): 1–11.
27.
FieldingKSHeadBW (2012) Determinants of young Australians’ environmental actions: The role of responsibility attributions, locus of control, knowledge and attitudes. Environmental Education Research18(2): 171–186.
28.
GauchatG (2012) Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review77(2): 167–187.
29.
GivensJEHazbounSOBriscoeMDKrannichRS (2021) Climate change views, energy policy support, and personal action in the Intermountain West: The anti-reflexivity effect. Society & Natural Resources34(1): 99–121.
30.
HaltinnerKSarathchandraD (2022) Predictors of pro-environmental beliefs, behaviors, and policy support among climate change skeptics. Social Currents9(2): 180–202.
31.
HineDWReserJPPhillipsWJCookseyRMarksADGNunnP, et al. (2013) Identifying climate change interpretive communities in a large Australian sample. Journal of Environmental Psychology36: 229–239.
32.
HornseyMJChapmanCMHumphreyJE (2022) Climate skepticism decreases when the planet gets hotter and conservative support wanes. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions74: 102492.
33.
HornseyMJHarrisEAFieldingKS (2018) Relationships among conspiratorial beliefs, conservatism and climate scepticism across nations. Nature Climate Change8(1): 614–620.
34.
HornseyMJHarrisEABainPGFieldingKS (2016) Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change6(6): 622–626.
35.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013) Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/
36.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2018) Special report: Global warming of 1.5° C. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
37.
JacquesPKnoxC (2016) Hurricanes and hegemony: A qualitative analysis of micro-level climate change denial discourses. Environmental Politics25(5): 831–852.
38.
KahanDM (2013) Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgement and Decision Making8(4): 407–424.
39.
KahanDMPetersEDawsonCESlovicP (2017) Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy1(1): 54–86.
40.
KahanDMPetersEWittlinMSlovicPOuelletteLLBramanD, et al. (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change2(10): 732–735.
41.
KhazaalYvan SingerMChattonAAchabSZullinoDRothenS, et al. (2014) Does self-selection affect samples’ representativeness in online surveys? An investigation in online video game research. Journal of Medical Internet Research16(7): e164.
42.
KolmodinSLundgrenMAnderssonC (2019) Preparing for climate change and hazards: Individual houseowners trust in local authorities and private entrepreneurs. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction41: 101277.
43.
KundaZ (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin108(3): 480–498.
44.
KwonSAKimSLeeJE (2019) Analyzing the determinants of individual action on climate change by specifying the roles of six values in South Korea. Sustainability11(7): 1834.
45.
LeiserowitzAMaibachERoser-RenoufCSmithNDawsonE (2013) Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. American Behavioral Scientist57(6): 818–837.
46.
LevensonH (1973) Perceived parental antecedents of internal powerful others, and chance locus of control orientations. Developmental Psychology9(2): 260–265.
47.
LevistonZWalkerIA (2011) Baseline Survey of Australian Attitudes to Climate Change: Preliminary Report. Canberra, ACT, Australia: CRSIO Publishing.
48.
LubkeC (2022) Socioeconomic roots of climate change denial and uncertainty among the European population. European Sociological Review38(1): 153–168.
49.
McCartyJAShrumLJ (2001) The influence of individualism, collectivism, and locus of control on environmental beliefs and behavior. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing20(1): 93–104.
50.
McCrightAM (2016) Anti-reflexivity and climate change skepticism in the US general public. Human Ecology Review22(2): 77–108.
51.
McCrightAMDunlapRE (2010) Anti-reflexivity. The American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory, Culture & Society27(2–3): 100–133.
52.
McCrightAMDunlapRE (2011) Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change21(4): 1163–1172.
53.
McCrightAMDentzmanKChartersMDietzT (2013) The influence of political ideology on trust in science. Environmental Research Letters8(4): 1–9.
54.
McCrightAMMarquart-PyattSTShwomRLBrechinSRAllenS (2016) Ideology, capitalism, and climate: Explaining public views about climate change in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science21: 180–189.
55.
MalerbaMEWrightNMacreadiePI (2022) Australian farm dams are becoming less reliable water sources under climate change. Science of the Total Environment829: 154360.
MorrisonMDuncanRSherleyCPartonK (2013) A comparison between attitudes to climate change in Australia and the United States. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management20(2): 87–100.
58.
MorrisonMPartonKHineDW (2018) Increasing belief but issue fatigue: Changes in Australian household climate change segments between 2011 and 2016. PLoS ONE13(6): e0197988.
59.
MostafaMM (2016) Post-materialism, religiosity, political orientation, locus of control and concern for global warming: A multilevel analysis across 40 nations. Social Indicators Research128(3): 1273–1298.
60.
NishantNJiFGuoYMHeroldNGreenDDi VirgilioG, et al. (2022) Future population exposure to Australian heatwaves. Environmental Research Letters17(6): 064030.
61.
Pavalache-IlieMUnianuE (2012) Locus of control and the pro-environmental attitudes. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences33: 198–202.
62.
PennycookGCheyneJSeliPKoehlerDFugelsangJ (2012) Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition123(3): 335–346.
63.
PickeringGJSchoenKBottaM (2021) Lifestyle decisions and climate mitigation: Current action and behavioural intent of youth. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change26: 25.
64.
PoortingaWSpenceAWhitmarshLCapstickSPidgeonNF (2011) Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change21(3): 1015–1024.
65.
PriceJCWalkerIABoschettiF (2014) Measuring cultural values and beliefs about environment to identify their role in climate change responses. Journal of Environmental Psychology37: 8–20.
ReserJPBradleyGLGlendonAIEllulMCCallaghanR (2012) Public Risk Perceptions, Understandings and Responses to Climate Change and Natural Disasters in Australia: 2010-2011 National Survey Findings. Gold Coast, QLD, Australia: National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility.
68.
RyonHSGleasonMEJ (2014) The role of locus of control in daily life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin40(1): 121–131.
69.
SarathchandraDHaltinnerK (2020) Trust/distrust judgments and perceptions of climate science: A research note on skeptics’ rationalizations. Public Understanding of Science29(1): 53–60.
70.
ShenhavARandDGreeneJ (2011) Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General141(3): 423–428.
71.
SmithEKHempelLM (2022) Alignment of values and political orientations amplifies climate change attitudes and behaviors. Climatic Change172: 4.
72.
StevensonKTKingTLSelmKRPetersonMNMonroeMC (2018) Framing climate change communication to prompt individual and collective action among adolescents from agricultural communities. Environmental Education Research24(3): 365–377.
TranterB (2013) The great divide: Political candidate and voter polarisation over global warming in Australia. Australian Journal of Politics and History59(3): 397–413.
75.
TranterBBoothK (2015) Scepticism in a changing climate: A cross-national study. Global Environmental Change33: 154–164.
76.
TranterBLesterL (2017) Climate patriots? Concern over climate change and other environmental issues in Australia. Public Understanding of Science26(6): 738–752.
77.
TranterBSkrbisZ (2014) Political and social divisions over climate change among young Queenslanders. Environment and Planning46: 1638–1651.
78.
TrivediRHPatelJDSavaliaJR (2015) Pro-environmental behaviour, locus of control and willingness to pay for environmental friendly products. Marketing Intelligence & Planning33(1): 67–89.
79.
TuitjerLDirksmeierPMewesL (2022) Geographies of climate change opinion. Geography Compass16(5): e12619.
80.
Van de MortelTF (2008) Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self-report research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing25(4): 40–48.
81.
Van RensburgWHeadB (2017) Climate change scepticism: Reconsidering how to respond to core criticisms of climate science and policy. Sage Open7(4): 1–11.
82.
WangJKimS (2018) Analysis of the impact of values and perception on climate change scepticism and its implications for public policy. Climate6(4): 99.
83.
WatsonJZhengBYChapmanSChenuK (2017) Projected impact of future climate on water-stress patterns across the Australian wheatbelt. Journal of Experimental Botany68(21–22): 5907–5921.
84.
WeckrothMAla-MantilaS (2022) Socioeconomic geography of climate change views in Europe. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions72: 102453.
85.
WhitmarshL (2011) Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change21(2): 690–700. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016.
86.
ZhangYBeggsPJBambrickHBerryHLLinnenleuckeMKTrueckS, et al. (2018) The MJA-Lancet countdown on health and climate change: Australian policy inaction threatens lives. Medical Journal of Australia209(11): 474.
87.
ZieglerA (2017) Political orientation, environmental values, and climate change beliefs and attitudes: An empirical cross country analysis. Energy Economic63: 144–153.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
