Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Public attitudes toward science have risen for decades yet dropped in the most recent period coinciding with the emergence of anti-scientific populist discourses around the world. Controlling for a number of attitudinal and demographic factors, this study examines whether populist discourse and vote share as well as regime polity have an impact on the public legitimacy of science in the period 2005–2020. Cross-national findings suggest that populism is a consistent predictor of declining support for science across all models, regardless of the political system. While it might be too early to alert to lasting damage done by populist leaders to the public standing of science, more research is warranted to ascertain the impact of anti-scientific rhetoric in the “post-truth era.”

Keywords

illiberalism populism science legitimacy trust in science

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

3M (2020) State of science index survey. Available at: https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/state-of-science-index-survey/ (accessed 22 September 2020).

Achterberg

De Koster

Van der Waal

(2017) Science confidence gap: Education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014. Public Understanding of Science 26(6): 704–720.

Ajzenman

Cavalcanti

Da Mata

(2020) More than words: Leaders’ speech and risky behavior during a pandemic. Cambridge-INET working paper WP2019. Available at: https://www.inet.econ.cam.ac.uk/research-papers/wp-abstracts?wp=2019 (accessed 22 September 2020).

Allcott

Gentzkow

(2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(2): 211–236.

Bak

H-J

(2002) Education and public attitudes toward science: Implications for the “deficit model” of education and support for science and technology. Social Science Quarterly 82(4): 779–795.

Baker

(2009) The educational transformation of work: Toward a new synthesis. Journal of Education and Work 22(3): 163–193.

Baker

(2014) The Schooled Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Baker

Köhler

Stock

(2004) Socialist Ideology and the Contraction of Higher Education. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human Development.

Barrera

Guriev

Henry

Zhuravskaya

(2020) Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics. Journal of Public Economics 182: 1–19.

10.

Bauer

Pansegrau

Shukla

(2018) Image, perception and cultural authority of science—By way of introduction. In: Bauer

Shukla

Allum

(eds) The Cultural Authority of Science: Comparing across Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas. London: Routledge, pp. 3–21.

11.

Bauer

Shukla

Allum

(eds) (2012) The Culture of Science: How the Public Relates to Science Across the Globe. London: Routledge.

12.

Beck

(2009) World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.

13.

Berezow

Campbell

(2012) Science Left behind: Feel-Good Fallacies and the Rise of the Anti-Scientific Left. New York, NY: Perseus.

14.

Bonikowski

Gidron

(2016) The populist style in American politics: Presidential campaign discourse, 1952–1996. Social Forces 94(4): 1593–1621.

15.

Caiani

(2019) The rise and endurance of radical right movements. Current Sociology 67(6): 918–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392119868000

16.

CEVIPOF (2020) Le Baromètre de la confiance politique. Available at: https://www.sciencespo.fr/cevipof/fr/content/le-barometre-de-la-confiance-politique.html (accessed 9 July 2020).

17.

Chang

Schnall

Law

Bronstein

Marraffa

Spiller

, et al. (2020) Cleaning and disinfectant chemical exposures and temporal associations with COVID–19 — National Poison Data System, United States, January 1, 2020-March 31, 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) 69(16): 496–498.

18.

Crettaz von Roten

(2018) Attitudes towards science in the World Values Surveys—longitudinal evidence 1981-2014. In: Bauer

Pansegrau

Shukla

(eds) The Cultural Authority of Science: Comparing across Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas. London: Routledge, pp. 264–277.

19.

Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) (2020) Public Attitudes to Science (Report No. 2020/012). Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/905466/public-attitudes-to-science-2019.pdf (accessed 11 March 2020).

20.

Dunlap

McCright

Yarosh

(2016) The political divide on climate change: Partisan polarization widens in the U.S. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 58(5): 4–23.

21.

Eatwell

Goodwin

(2018) National Populism: The Revolt against Liberal Democracy. London: Penguin.

22.

Ecklund

Scheitle

(2017) Religion vs. Science: What Religious People Really Think. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

23.

Evans

(2014) Faith in science in global perspective: Implications for transhumanism. Public Understanding of Science 23(7): 814–832.

24.

Evans

(2018) Morals not Knowledge: Recasting the Contemporary U.S. Conflict between Religion and Science. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

25.

Frank

Meyer

(2020) The University and the Global Knowledge Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

26.

Gauchat

(2015) The political context of science in the United States: Public acceptance of evidence-based policy and science funding. Social Forces 94(2): 723–746.

27.

Gross

(2013) Why Are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

28.

Guillen

(2018) Rude Awakening: Threats to the Global Liberal Order. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

29.

Habermas

(1970) Technology and science as “ideology.” In: Habermas

(ed.) Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics (trans. Shapiro

). Boston, MA: Beacon Press, pp. 81–122.

30.

Harambam

Aupers

(2015) Contesting epistemic authority: Conspiracy theories on the boundaries of science. Public Understanding of Science 24(4): 466–480.

31.

Hawkins

Aguilar

Castanho Silva

Jenne

Kocijan

Kaltwasser

(2019a) Global Populism Database, v1 (V1 ed.). Harvard Dataverse. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LFTQEZ

32.

Hawkins

Aguilar

Castanho Silva

Jenne

Kocijan

Kaltwasser

(2019b) Measuring populist discourse: The global populism database. In: EPSA annual conference, Belfast, 20–22 June.

33.

Hayes

Tariq

(2000) Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science 9(4): 433–447.

34.

Inglehart

Haerpfer

Moreno

Welzel

Kizilova

Diez-Medrano

Lagos

Norris

Ponarin

Puranen

, et al. (eds.) (2014) World Values Survey: Round Six - Country-Pooled Datafile Version: www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp. Madrid: JD Systems Institute.

35.

Inside Higher Ed (2017) Academic freedom front lines. Inside Higher Ed, 30 March. Available at: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/03/30/hungary-and-russia-western-style-universities-are-under-threat (accessed 28 December 2019).

36.

Inside Higher Ed (2018) Falling confidence in higher ed. Inside Higher Ed, 9 October. Available at: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/10/09/gallup-survey-finds-falling-confidence-higher-education (accessed 13 January 2020).

37.

Laclau

(2005) On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

38.

Lewandowsky

Ecker

UKH

Cook

(2017) Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 6(4): 353–369.

39.

Mann

Schleifer

(2019) Love the science, hate the scientists: Conservative identity protects belief in science and undermines trust in scientists. Social Forces 99(1): 305–332.

40.

Marshall

Jaggers

(2017) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2017 [Data set]. Center for International Development and Conflict Management.

41.

Mede

Schäfer

(2020) Science-related populism: Conceptualizing populist demands toward science. Public Understanding of Science 29(5): 473–491.

42.

Merton

(1968) Science and democratic social structure. In: Merton

(ed.) Social theory and social structure. New York, NY: The Free Press, pp. 604–615.

43.

Meyer

Boli

Thomas

(1987) Ontology and rationalization in the western cultural account. In: Thomas

Meyer

Ramirez

Boli

(eds) Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual. London: SAGE, pp. 2–37.

44.

Meyer

Boli

Thomas

Ramirez

(1997) World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology 103(1): 144–181.

45.

Mudde

Kaltwasser

(2018) Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies 51(13): 1667–1693.

46.

Nature (2018) Editorial: Brazil’s new president adds to global threat to science, 563, 5-6. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07236-w (accessed 16 November 2021).

47.

Nichols

(2017) The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

48.

Norris

Inglehart

(2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

49.

Osborne

Simon

Collins

(2003) Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education 25(9): 1049–1079.

50.

Pew Research Center (2018) Despite Rising Economic Confidence, Japanese See Best Days behind Them and Say Children Face a Bleak Future. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/11/Pew-Research-Center_Despite-Rising-Economic-Confidence-Japanese-See-Best-Days-Behind-Them-and-Say-Children-Face-Bleak-Future_2018-11-121.pdf (accessed 9 March 2020).

51.

Pew Research Center (2020) Trust in Medical Scientists Has Grown in U.S. but Mainly among Democrats. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/05/21/trust-in-medical-scientists-has-grown-in-u-s-but-mainly-among-democrats/#americans-confidence-in-medical-scientists-is-up-since-the-coronavirus-outbreak-but-the-rise-is-among-democrats-not-republicans (accessed 23 August 2020).

52.

Price

Peterson

(2016) Scientific progress, risk, and development: Explaining attitudes toward science cross-nationally. International Sociology 31(1): 57–80.

53.

Raudenbush

Bryk

(2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

54.

Resnick

(2020) Trust in Science and in Government Plays a Crucial Role in COVID–19 Response. International Food Policy Research Institute. Available at: https://www.ifpri.org/blog/trust-science-and-government-plays-crucial-role-covid-19-response (accessed 20 September 2020).

55.

Schofer

Lerch

Meyer

(2018) Illiberal reactions to the university in the 21st century. In: Annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Philadelphia, PA, 11–14 August.

56.

Schofer

Ramirez

Meyer

(2020) The societal consequences of higher education. Sociology of Education 94(1): 1–19.

57.

Scholars At Risk (2020) Academic Freedom Monitoring Project. Available at: https://www.scholarsatrisk.org/academic-freedom-monitoring-project-index/ (accessed 3 July 2020).

58.

Science Nordic (2018) Swedish Women Less Trusting of Researchers. Science Nordic, 11 January. Available at: https://sciencenordic.com/forskningno-science-society–culture/swedish-women-less-trusting-of-researchers/1453018 (accessed 24 February 2020).

59.

The Washington Post (2016) China’s next crackdown target: Universities. The Washington Post, 13 December. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/china-next-crackdown-target-universities/2016/12/13/65371e6e-c0e2-11e6-afd9-f038f753dc29_story.html?utm_term=.42cea54dd62e (accessed 12 December 2019).

60.

The Washington Post (2017) Elitists, crybabies and junky degrees: A Trump supporter explains rising conservative anger at American universities. The Washington Post, 25 November. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2017/11/25/elitists-crybabies-and-junky-degrees/ (accessed 12 December 2019).

61.

Timbro (2020) Authoritarian Populism Index. Available at: https://populismindex.com/data/ (accessed 7 July 2020).

62.

Wang

Huang

(2020) When “fake news” becomes real: The consequences of false government denials in an authoritarian country. Comparative Political Studies 54(5): 753–778.

63.

World Value Survey (WVS) (2020) Documentation and Download. Available at: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp (accessed 9 July 2020).

64.

Ylä-Anttila

(2018) Populist knowledge: “Post-truth” repertoires of contesting epistemic authorities. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 5(4): 356–388.

65.

Zapp

(2022) Revisiting the Global Knowledge Economy: The Worldwide Expansion of Research and Development Personnel, 1980–2015. Minerva 60: 181–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09455-4

66.

Zapp

Ramirez

(2019) Beyond internationalisation and isomorphism – the construction of a global higher education regime. Comparative Education 55(4): 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2019.1638103

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

The legitimacy of science and the populist backlash: Cross-national and longitudinal trends and determinants of attitudes toward science

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material