Thinking,not talking,predicts knowledge level: Effects of media attention and reflective integration on public knowledge of nuclear energy

Abstract

By applying the cognitive mediation model, this study seeks to investigate factors influencing public knowledge of nuclear energy in Singapore. In addition, this study seeks to extend the cognitive mediation model by explicating the knowledge variable into four facets – general science knowledge, perceived familiarity, content nuclear knowledge and contextual nuclear knowledge. Using data collected from an interviewer-led door-to-door survey with 1000 Singapore citizens and permanent residents (PRs), we found that attention to TV news, website news and social media news stimulated news elaboration and interpersonal discussion. However, attention to print newspaper was neither associated with news elaboration nor interpersonal discussion. We also found that news elaboration could enhance factual knowledge such as general science knowledge, content nuclear knowledge and contextual nuclear knowledge, while interpersonal discussion could enhance perceived familiarity. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Keywords

cognitive mediation model interpersonal discussion knowledge media attention news elaboration nuclear energy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Gerbing

(1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103: 411–423.

Beaudoin

Thorson

(2004) Testing the cognitive mediation model: The roles of news reliance and three gratifications sought. Communication Research 31: 446–471.

Browne

Cudeck

(1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen

Long

(eds) Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, pp. 136–162.

Byrne

(2013) Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York, NY: Routledge.

Cacciatore

Anderson

Choi

Brossard

Scheufele

Liang

, et al. (2012) Coverage of emerging technologies: A comparison between print and online media. New Media & Society 14(6): 1039–1059.

Carpini

MXD

Keeter

(1996) What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Chuah

Leong

Cummings

(2018) Label it or ban it? Public perceptions of nano-food labels and propositions for banning nano-food applications. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 20(2): 36.

Drew

Weaver

(1990) Media attention, media exposure, and media effects. Journalism Quarterly 67(4): 740–748.

Dunning

(2011) The Dunning–Kruger effect: On being ignorant of one’s own ignorance. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 44: 247–296.

10.

Energy Market Authority (2019) Energy supply. Available at: https://www.ema.gov.sg/Singapore-Energy-Statistics-2019/Ch01/index1 (accessed 26 March 2020).

11.

Eveland

Jr (1998) The cognitive mediation model: A framework for studying learning from the news with survey methods. In: Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Baltimore, MD, 5–8 August 1998.

12.

Eveland

Jr (2001) The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from nonelection, off-year election, and presidential election contexts. Communication Research 28(5): 571–601.

13.

Eveland

Jr Marton

Seo

(2004) Moving beyond ‘just the facts’ the influence of online news on the content and structure of public affairs knowledge. Communication Research 31(1): 82–108.

14.

Eveland

Jr Shah

Kwak

(2003) Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: A panel study of motivations, information processing, and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research 30(4): 359–386.

15.

Eveland

Jr Thomson

(2006) Is it talking, thinking, or both? A lagged dependent variable model of discussion effects on political knowledge. Journal of Communication 56(3): 523–542.

16.

Friedman

(2011) Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima: An analysis of traditional and new media coverage of nuclear accidents and radiation. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 67(5): 55–65.

17.

Gil de Zúñiga

Jung

Valenzuela

(2012) Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 17(3): 319–336.

18.

Hollander

(1995) The new news and the 1992 presidential campaign: Perceived vs. actual political knowledge. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 72: 786–798.

19.

Leong

Looi

Chen

Pang

Tandoc

Jr (2018a) Science literacy or value predisposition? A meta-analysis of factors predicting public perceptions of benefits, risks, and acceptance of nuclear energy. Environmental Communication 13(4): 1–15.

20.

Leong

Looi

Chuah

(2019) Online, offline, or word-of-mouth? Complementary media usage patterns and credibility perceptions of nuclear energy information in Southeast Asia. Energy Research & Social Science 48: 46–56.

21.

Looi

Chuah

Leong

Pang

(2018b) ‘I can live with nuclear energy if. . .’: Exploring public perceptions of nuclear energy in Singapore. Energy Policy 120: 436–447.

22.

Peh

Soh

(2013) The cognitive mediation model: Factors influencing public knowledge of the H1N1 pandemic and intention to take precautionary behaviors. Journal of Health Communication 18(7): 773–794.

23.

Yang

(2018) Communication, cognitive processing, and public knowledge about climate change. Asian Journal of Communication 28(5): 449–467.

24.

Yang

Thanwarani

Chan

(2017) Examining public acquisition of science knowledge from social media in Singapore: An extension of the cognitive mediation model. Asian Journal of Communication 27(2): 193–212.

25.

Housing & Development Board (2021) Types of flats. Available at: https://www.hdb.gov.sg/residential/buying-a-flat/resale/getting-started/types-of-flats (accessed 28 April 2021).

26.

Bentler

(1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling 6(1): 1–55.

27.

Jho

Yoon

Kim

(2014) The relationship of science knowledge, attitude and decision making on socio-scientific issues: The case study of students’ debates on a nuclear power plant in Korea. Science & Education 23(5): 1131–1151.

28.

Jonassen

Beissner

Yacci

(2013) Structural Knowledge: Techniques for Representing, Conveying, and Acquiring Structural Knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge.

29.

Katz

(1957) The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly 21(1): 61–78.

30.

Kiousis

McCombs

(2004) Agenda-setting effects and attitude strength: Political figures during the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research 31(1): 36–57.

31.

Kratzke

Vilchis

Amatya

(2013) Breast cancer prevention knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors among college women and mother–daughter communication. Journal of Community Health 38: 560–568.

32.

Lee

Scheufele

Lewenstein

(2005) Public attitudes toward emerging technologies: Examining the interactive effects of cognitions and affect on public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Science Communication 27(2): 240–267.

33.

Lee

EWJ

(2015) Staying abreast of breast cancer: Examining how communication and motivation relate to Singaporean women’s breast cancer knowledge. Asian Journal of Communication 25: 422–442.

34.

Lee

EWJ

Shin

Kawaja

(2016) The augmented cognitive mediation model: Examining antecedents of factual and structural breast cancer knowledge among Singaporean women. Journal of Health Communication 21(5): 583–592.

35.

Lee

(2017) Digital news consumption in Singapore on the rise; The Straits Times remains most-read English paper: Nielsen survey. The Straits Times. Available at: https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/digital-news-consumption-in-singapore-on-the-rise-the-straits-times-remains-most-read (accessed 28 September 2019).

36.

Levy

Windahl

(1985) The concept of audience activity. In: Rosengren

Wenner

Palmgreen

(eds) Media Gratifications Research: Current Perspectives. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, pp. 109–122.

37.

Liang

Brossard

Xenos

Scheufele

Anderson

, et al. (2015) Value predispositions as perceptual filters: Comparing of public attitudes toward nanotechnology in the United States and Singapore. Public Understanding of Science 24(5): 582–600.

38.

Mah

Hills

Tao

(2014) Risk perception, trust and public engagement in nuclear decision-making in Hong Kong. Energy Policy 73: 368–390.

39.

Miller

(1983) Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus 112: 29–48.

40.

Miller

(1998) The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science 7: 203–223.

41.

Ministry of Trade and Industry (2012) Nuclear energy pre-feasibility study. Available at: https://www.mti.gov.sg/-/media/MTI/Newsroom/Parliament-QandAs/2012/10/Second-Minister-S-Iswarans-reply-to-Parliament-Questions-on-nuclear-energy-pre-feasibility-study-in-/pre-fs-factsheet.pdf (accessed 10 October 2021).

42.

Morse

(2013) Nuclear Methods in Mineral Exploration and Production. Armsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

43.

Muthén

(2012) Mplus Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables – User’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.

44.

National Climate Change Secretariat (2012) Climate change & Singapore: Challenges. Opportunities. Partnerships. Available at: https://www.nccs.gov.sg/docs/default-source/publications/national-climate-change-strategy.pdf (accessed 26 March 2020).

45.

Perse

(1990) Involvement with local television news: Cognitive and emotional dimensions. Human Communication Research 16(4): 556–581.

46.

Popper

(2012) Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

47.

Raju

Lonial

Mangold

(1995) Differential effects of subjective knowledge, objective knowledge, and usage experience on decision making: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology 4(2): 153–180.

48.

Rosenthal

Detenber

Rojas

(2018) Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects. Communication Research 45: 554–576.

49.

Runge

Yeo

Cacciatore

Scheufele

Brossard

Xenos

, et al. (2013) Tweeting nano: How public discourses about nanotechnology develop in social media environments. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 15: 1381.

50.

Ruz

(2011) The six natural resources most drained by our 7 billion people. The Guardian, 31 October 11. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2011/oct/31/six-natural-resources-population (accessed 25 March 2020).

51.

Schumacker

Lomax

(2004) A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

52.

Shoemaker

(1996) Hardwired for news: Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function. Journal of Communication 46(3): 32–47.

53.

Simis

Madden

Cacciatore

Yeo

(2016) The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Public Understanding of Science 25: 400–414.

54.

Singapore Department of Statistic (2019) Singapore in figures 2019. Available at: https://www.singstat.gov.sg/-/media/files/publications/reference/sif2019.pdf (accessed 26 March 2020).

55.

Southwell

Yzer

(2009) When (and why) interpersonal talk matters for campaigns. Communication Theory 19(1): 1–8.

56.

Stoutenborough

Sturgess

Vedlitz

(2013) Knowledge, risk, and policy support: Public perceptions of nuclear power. Energy Policy 62: 176–184.

57.

Strategy Group in Prime Minister’s Office (2020) Speech by Senior Minister and Coordinating Minister for National Security Teo Chee Hean, Committee of Supply 2020. Available at: https://www.strategygroup.gov.sg/media/speeches/speech-by-senior-minister-and-coordinating-minister-for-national-security-teo-chee-hean-committee-of-supply-2020-28-february-2020 (accessed 25 October 2021).

58.

Sturgis

Allum

(2004) Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science 13: 55–74.

59.

The American Association for Public Opinion Research (2016) Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 9th edn. Alexandria, VA: AAPOR. Available at: https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf (accessed 3 May 2021).

60.

Urban Redevelopment Authority of Singapore (2020) Master plan. Available at: https://www.ura.gov.sg/Corporate/Planning/Master-Plan (accessed 26 March 2020).

61.

World Nuclear Association (2020) Emerging nuclear energy countries. Available at: http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/others/emerging-nuclear-energy-countries.aspx (accessed 20 March 2020).

62.

World Nuclear Association (2021) Nuclear power in the World today. Available at http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/nuclear-power-in-the-world-today.aspx

63.

Yang

Chuah

Lee

(2017) Extending the cognitive mediation model: Examining factors associated with perceived familiarity and factual knowledge of nanotechnology. Mass Communication and Society 20(3): 403–426.

64.

Yang

(2012) Too scared or too capable? Why do college students stay away from the H1N1 vaccine? Risk Analysis: An International Journal 32(10): 1703–1716.

65.

Yeo

Cacciatore

Brossard

Scheufele

Runge

, et al. (2014) Partisan amplification of risk: American perceptions of nuclear energy risk in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi disaster. Energy Policy 67: 727–736.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB