This article explores and discusses understandings of citizen science with members of Japanese citizen radiation measuring organizations who began measuring radioactive contamination in food, soil, air, and human bodies after the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident. Building on in-depth interviews with organization members and extensive multi-site fieldwork (2018, 2020), the article takes shimin kagaku (citizen science in Japanese) to examine articulations of citizenship and science, while discussing citizen radiation measuring organization activities. Adopting Tsing’s notion of nonscalability, it draws attention to the manifold articulations of citizenship and science, unearthing frictions embedded in Japanese science–society relations. In this way, this article outlines the diversity of notions of citizenship and science, and of citizen participatory practices in science. By bringing nonscalability to bear on an analysis of different articulations of shimin kagaku, this article encourages scientists and public authorities to engage with citizen participatory practices reflexively and responsibly by considering local articulations and knowledges.
AbeY (2015) Measuring for what: Networked citizen science movements after the Fukushima nuclear accident. Dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
2.
AvenellSA (2010) Making Japanese Citizens: Civil Society and the Mythology of the Shimin in Postwar Japan. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3.
BonneyRBallardHJordanRMcCallieEPhillipsTShirkJ, et al. (2009) Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group report, Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education, Washington, DC, July. Available at: https://www.informalscience.org/sites/default/files/PublicParticipationinScientificResearch.pdf (accessed 6 March 2020).
4.
BrownAPieterFBonnerSDolezalNMorossJ (2016) Safecast: Successful citizen-science for radiation measurement and communication after Fukushima. Journal of Radiological Protection36(2): S82–S101.
Center for the Research and Support of Educational Practice, Tokyo Gakugei University (2016) Collection of Documents Radiation Measurement by Citizens and the Local Government and School Meals: A Record by Koganei Citizens of 30 Year Chernobyl and 5 Year Fukushima (in Japanese).Tokyo, Japan: Center for the Research and Support of Educational Practice, Tokyo Gakugei University.
8.
ClarkeJ (2015) Stuart Hall and the theory and practice of articulation. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education26: 275–286.
9.
CooperC (2016) Citizen Science: How Ordinary People Are Changing the Face of Discovery. New York, NY: Abrams Press.
10.
CorburnJ (2005) Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
11.
CurtisV (2018) Online Citizen Science and the Widening of Academia: Distributed Engagement with Research and Knowledge Production. Cham: Springer.
12.
EitzelMVCappadonnaJLSantos-LangCDuerrREVirapongseAWestSE, et al. (2017) Citizen science terminology matters: Exploring key terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice2(1): 1–20.
13.
EpsteinS (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14.
FanFChenSL (2019) Citizen, science, and citizen science. EASTS13: 181–193.
15.
FlemmenAB (2017) Chapter 5—Sensitizing concepts in action: Expanding the framework. In: LeiulfsrudHSohlbergP (eds) Concepts in Action: Conceptual Constructionism. Leiden: Brill, pp. 79–94.
16.
FujigakiY (ed.) (2015) Lessons from Fukushima: Japanese Case Studies on Science, Technology and Society. Cham: Springer.
17.
GabrysJPritchardHBarrattB (2016) Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society3(2): 1–14.
18.
HaklayM (2013) Citizen science and volunteered geographic information—Overview and typology of participation. In: SuiDZElwoodSGoodchildMF (eds) Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Springer, pp. 105–122.
19.
HannibalME (2016) Citizen Scientist: Searching for Heroes and Hope in an Age of Extinction. New York, NY: The Experiment.
20.
HarawayD (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies14(3): 575–599.
21.
HasegawaK (2004) Constructing Civil Society in Japan: Voices of Environmental Movements. Balwyn North, VIC, Australia: Trans Pacific Press.
22.
HattoriN (Ed) (2016) To Measure, to Learn, and to Live: Radiation Safety Uide for Families—What We Can Do in Order to Protect Children from Radioactivity (in Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: Kodomira Radiation Measuring Station for Children and Future.
23.
HessDJ (2009) The potentials and limitations of civil society research: Getting undone science done. Sociological Inquiry79(3): 306–327.
24.
IrwinA (1995) Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
KenensJVan OudheusdenMYoshizawaGVan HoyweghenI (2020) Science by, with and for citizens: Rethinking ‘citizen science’ after the 2011 Fukushima disaster. Palgrave Communications, 6, Art.No. 58: 1–8. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-0434-3.
26.
KenensJ (2020) Changing perspectives: tracing the evolution of citizen radiation measuring organizations after Fukushima. Radioprotection, 55 (HS2): S249–S253. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1051/radiopro/2020041.
27.
KennelyJ (2009) Good citizen/bad activist: The cultural role of the state in youth activism. Review of Education Pedagogy and Cultural Studies32(2): 127–149.
28.
KimuraAH (2016) Radiation Brain Moms and Citizen Scientists: The Gender Politics of Food Contamination after Fukushima. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
29.
KimuraAH (2017) Citizen science in post-Fukushima Japan: The gendered scientization of radiation measurement. Science as Culture28(3): 1–24.
30.
KimuraAHKinchyA (2019) Science by the People: Participation, Power and the Politics of Environmental Knowledge. Chicago, IL: Rutgers University Press.
31.
KullenbergCKasperowskiD (2016) What is citizen science? —A scientometric meta-analysis. PLoS ONE11(1): e0147152.
32.
LawJ (2015) What’s wrong with a one-world world?Distinktion16(1): 126–139.
33.
LeblancRM (1999) Bicycle Citizens: The Political World of the Japanese Housewife. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34.
Minna no Data Site (2018) Compilations of a Radiation Map of 17 Prefectures and Cities + Analysis (in Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: Minna no Data Site.
35.
MolA (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
36.
MolA (2013) Bami goreng for Mrs. Klerks and other stories on food and culture. In: AkrichMBartheYMuniesaFMustarP (eds) Mélanges: for Michel Callon. Paris: Presses des Mines, pp. 325–334.
37.
MoritaABlokAKimuraS (2013) Environmental infrastructures of emergency: The formation of a civic radiation monitoring map during the Fukushima disaster. In: HindmarshR (ed.) Nuclear Disaster at Fukushima Daiichi: Social, Political and Environmental Issues. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 78–96.
38.
Morris-SuzukiT (2014) Touching the grass: Science, uncertainty and everyday life from Chernobyl to Fukushima. Science, Technology and Society19(3): 331–362.
39.
NakayamaShigeru (1991) Science, Technology and Society in Postwar Japan. London and New York: egan Paul International.
40.
O’ConnorBH (2020) Revisiting Americanist Arguments and Rethinking Scale in linguistic anthropology. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology30(3): 284–303.
41.
OttingerG (2010) Buckets of resistance: Standards and the effectiveness of citizen science. Science, Technology, & Human Values35(2): 244–270.
42.
PerkoT (2016) Risk communication in the case of the Fukushima accident: Impact of communication and lessons to be learned. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management12(4): 683–686.
43.
PritchardHGabrysJHoustonL (2018) Re-calibrating DIY: Testing digital participation across dust sensors, fry pans and environmental pollution. New Media & Society20(12): 4533–4552.
44.
RieschRPotterC (2013) Citizens science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. Public Understanding of Science23(1): 107–120.
45.
RussellSA (2014) Diary of a Citizen Scientist: Chasing Tiger Beetles and Other New Ways of Engaging the World. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
TsingAL (2005) Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Pres.
51.
TsingAL (2012) On nonscalability: The living world is not amenable to Precision-Nested Scales. Common Knowledge18(3): 505–524.
52.
TsingAL (2017) The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Pres.
53.
Van den HoonaardWC (1996) Working with Sensitizing Concepts: Analytical Field Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
54.
Von HippelF (1991) Citizen Scientist: Collected Essays of Frank Von Hippel. New York, NY: Masters of Modern Physics.
55.
WarinMMartinA (2018) Emergent postgenomic bodies and their (non) scalable environments. In: MeloniMCrombyJFitzgeraldDLloydS (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Biology and Society. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 703–725.
56.
WeingartPMeyerC (2021) Citizen science in South Africa: Rhetoric and reality. Public Understanding of Science30: 605–620.
57.
WynneB (2016) Knowledges in context. Science, Technology & Human Values16(1): 111–121.
58.
YoshidaM (2020) Scaling precarity: The material-semiotic practices of ocean acidification. Japanese Review of Cultural Anthropology21(1): 457–491.
