Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The public acceptance of evolution in the United States is a long-standing problem. Using data from a series of national surveys collected over the last 35 years, we find that the level of public acceptance of evolution has increased in the last decade after at least two decades in which the public was nearly evenly divided on the issue. A structural equation model indicates that increasing enrollment in baccalaureate-level programs, exposure to college-level science courses, a declining level of religious fundamentalism, and a rising level of civic scientific literacy are responsible for the increased level of public acceptance.

Keywords

biology/evolution public acceptance structural equation model time series United States

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramowitz

(2010) The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Abramowitz

(2018) The Great Alignment: Race, Party Transformation, and the Rise of Donald Trump. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Axelrod

(1973) Schema theory: An information processing model of perception and cognition. American Political Science Review 67: 1248–66.

Austin

(2018) Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: Unpacking a movement and sharing lessons learned. Meeting Report. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Available at: https://live-visionandchange.pantheonsite.io/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/VandC-2018-finrr.pdf

Baker

(2013) Acceptance of evolution and support for teaching creationism in public schools: The conditional impact of educational attainment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52(1): 216–228.

Bengtson

Biblarz

Roberts

REL

(2002) How Families Still Matter: A Longitudinal Study of Youth in Two Generations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Berkman

Plutzer

(2010) Evolution, Creationism, and the Battle to Control America’s Classrooms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Blancke

Hjermitslev

Kjaergaard

(eds) (2014) Creationism in Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Branch

(2009) Creationism as a global phenomenon. In: Robbins

Cohen

(eds) Darwin and the Bible: The Cultural Confrontation. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, pp. 137–151.

10.

Branch

Scott

Rosenau

(2010) Dispatches from the evolution wars: Shifting tactics and expanding battlefields. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 11: 317–338.

11.

Brenan

(2019) 40% Of Americans Believe in Creationism. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/261680/americans-believecreatioism.aspx

12.

Case

Given

(2016) Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. Bingley: Emerald.

13.

Chaves

(2017) American Religion: Contemporary Trends. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

14.

Costner

(1965) Criteria for measures of association. American Sociological Review 30(3): 341–353.

15.

Coyne

(2012) Science, religion, and society: The problem of evolution in America. Evolution 66(8): 2654–2663.

16.

Dolan

Borrero

Callis-Duehl

Musgrove

MMC

de Lima

Ero-Tolliver , et al (2020) Undergraduate biology education research Gordon research conference: A meeting report. CBE – Life Sciences Education 19(20): mr1

17.

Emerson

Hartman

(2006) The rise of fundamentalism. Annual Review of Sociology 32: 127–144.

18.

Hayduk

(1987) Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

19.

Hill

(2014) Rejecting evolution: The role of religion, education, and social networks. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 53(3): 575–594 (Reprinted in Mirola

Emerson

Monahan

(eds) Sociology of Religion: A reader. New York, NY: Routledge. 2019. pp. 361–75).

20.

Hyman

Wright

Reed

(1975) The Enduring Effects of Education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

21.

Ipsos (2011) Supreme Being, the Afterlife, and Evolution. Available at: https://www.ipsos.com.

22.

Jöreskog

Sörbom

(1993) LISREL 8. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.

23.

Kampourakis

(2020) Understanding Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Levendusky

(2009) The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

25.

Marsden

(1991) Understanding fundamentalism and evangelicalism. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing.

26.

Martin

(2010) Compatibility of major U.S. Christian denominations with evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach 3(3): 420–431.

27.

Miller

(1983) Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus 112(2): 29–48.

28.

Miller

(1987) Scientific literacy in the United States. In: Evered

O’Connor

(eds) Communicating Science to the Public. London: Wiley, pp. 19–40.

29.

Miller

(1998) The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science 7: 1–21.

30.

Miller

(2000) The development of civic scientific literacy in the United States. In: Kumar

Chubin

(eds) Science, Technology, and Society: A Sourcebook on Research and Practice. New York, NY: Plenum Press, pp. 21–47.

31.

Miller

(2010a) The conceptualization and measurement of civic scientific literacy for the 21st century. In: Hildebrand

Meinwald

(eds) Science and the Educated American: A Core Component of Liberal Education. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, pp. 241–255.

32.

Miller

(2010b) Civic scientific literacy: The role of the media in the electronic era. In: Kennedy

Overholser

(eds) Science, Technology, and the Media. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, pp. 44–63.

33.

Miller

(2010c) Adult science learning in the Internet era. Curator 53(2): 191–208.

34.

Miller

(2012) The sources and impact of civic scientific literacy. In: Bauer

Shukla

Allum

(eds) The Culture of Science: How the Public Relates to Science across the Globe. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 217–240.

35.

Miller

Ackerman

Laspra

Huffaker

(2021) The acquisition of health and science information in the 21st century. The Information Society 37(2): 82–98.

36.

Miller

Pardo

Niwa

(1997) Public Perceptions of Science and Technology: A Comparative Study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Madrid: BBV Foundation Press.

37.

Miller

Scott

Okamoto

(2006) Public acceptance of evolution. Science 313: 765–766.

38.

Muller

(2010) Physics for Future Presidents. In: Hildebrand

Meinwald

(eds) Science and the Educated American: A Core Component of Liberal Education. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, pp. 112–129.

39.

Pew Research Center (2013) Public’s Views on Human Evolution. Available at: https://www.pewforum.org/2013/12/30/publics-views-on-human-evolution/

40.

Pew Research Center (2015) America’s Changing Religious Landscape. Available at: https://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/

41.

Pew Research Center (2019a) U.S. Public Views on Climate and Energy. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2019/11/25/u-s-public-views-on-climate-and-energy/

42.

Pew Research Center (2019b) The Evolution of Pew Research Center’s Survey Questions about the Origins and Development of Life on Earth. Available at: https://www.pewforum.org/2019/02/06/the-evolution-of-pew-research-centers-survey-questions-about-the-origins-and-development-of-life-on-earth/

43.

Pew Research Center (2020) Biotechnology Research Viewed with Caution Globally, but Most Support Gene Editing for Babies to Treat Disease. Available at: https://www.pewrearch.org/2020/12/10/biotechnology-research-viewed-with-caution-globally-but-most-support-gene-editing-for-babies-to-treat-disease/

44.

Plutzer

Berkman

(2008) Evolution, creationism, and the teaching of human origins in schools. Public Opinion Quarterly 72(3): 540–553.

45.

Plutzer

Branch

Reid

(2020) Teaching evolution in U.S. public schools: a continuing challenge. Evolution: Education and Outreach 13(4).

46.

Putnam

Campbell

(2010) American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

47.

Schank

Abelson

(1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry in Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

48.

Scott

(2009) Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

49.

Shen

BSJ

(1975) Scientific literacy and the public understanding of science. In: Day

(ed.) Communication of Scientific Information. Basel: Karger, pp. 44–52.

50.

Shumow

Miller

(2001) Parents’ at-home and at-school academic involvement with adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence 21(1): 68–91.

51.

Society for Integrative Comparative Biology (n.d.). Available at: https://sicb.org/rer/saawok.php3

52.

Sternberg

Ben-Zeev

(2001) Complex Cognition: The Psychology of Human Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.

53.

Swift

(2017) In U.S. belief in creationist view of humans at new low. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/210956/belief-creationist-view-humans-new-low.aspx

54.

United States Census Bureau (2019) CPS historical time series. Table A-2. Available at: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/educational-attainment/cps-historical-time-series.html

55.

van Dijk

(2020) The Network Society. 2nd ed. New York, NY: SAGE.

56.

Wilcox

Larson

(2006) Onward Christian Soldiers? The Religious Right in American Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

57.

Williams

(2012) God’s Own Party: The Making of the Christian Right. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.18 MB

Public acceptance of evolution in the United States,1985–2020

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material