Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Photographs are widely used to visualise science. However, the influence of visual quality of photographs on the effectiveness of science communication is often disregarded and seldom tested. This study examines how the visual quality of photographs affects science communication on interpretive signage within Xixi National Wetland Park, China. Results show that a high-quality photograph on the signage significantly increased the following affective and cognitive aspects of communication: (1) a visitor’s intention to read the signage, (2) enjoyment of reading the interpretive information, (3) understanding and (4) recall of the information on the signage. This study offers empirical evidence for the benefits of using high-quality photographs to visualise science. To improve the effectiveness of science communication in interpretive products, we argue that the quality of the selected photographs should be considered seriously.

Keywords

interpretation national park photograph science communication signage visual quality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akama

Kieti

(2003) Measuring tourist satisfaction with Kenya’s wildlife safari: A case study of Tsavo West National Park. Tourism Management 24: 73–81.

Allen

(2018) Visual brokerage: Communicating data and research through visualisation. Public Understanding of Science 27: 906–922.

Antal

Dulama

Ilovan

O-R

(2020) Teachers’ opinions on using photographs to study natural sciences. Romanian Review of Geographical Education 9: 21–37.

Arabatzis

Grigoroudis

(2010) Visitors’ satisfaction, perceptions and gap analysis: The case of Dadia–Lefkimi–Souflion National Park. Forest Policy and Economics 12: 163–172.

Ballantyne

Packer

Sutherland

(2011) Visitors’ memories of wildlife tourism: Implications for the design of powerful interpretive experiences. Tourism Management 32: 770–779.

Berlyne

(1960) Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill Book

Betts

McNaughton

(2003) Adding an aesthetic image to mathematics education. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning.

Bramwell

Lane

(1993) Interpretation and sustainable tourism: The potential and the pitfalls. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 1: 71–80.

Bureau Hangzhou Statistical (2018) Hangzhou Statistical Year Book (2018). Beijing: China Statistical Press.

10.

Burns

O’Connor

Stocklmayer

(2003) Science communication: A contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science 12: 183–202.

11.

Caivano

(2008) The representation of the visual world in photography. In: Conference on colour in graphics, imaging, and vision. Society for imaging science and technology, pp. 189–193. Available at: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ist/cgiv/2012/00002012/00000001

12.

Carr

(2012) Science photography: Communicating research through photos. BioScience 62: 458–459.

13.

Creative Commons (2017) Creative commons: About the licenses. Available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=enAbout

14.

Curtis

Reid

Ballard

(2012) Communicating ecology through art: What scientists think. Ecology and Society 17: 3–18.

15.

Dandan

(2012) Research on the designing of content in the environment explanation board in eco-tourism destination. Sichuan Forestry Exploration and Design 9: 38–43.

16.

Datta

Wang

(2010) ACQUINE: Aesthetic quality inference engine-real-time automatic rating of photo aesthetics. In: Proceedings of the international conference on multimedia information retrieval, Philadelphia, PA, 14–19 March, pp. 421–424. New York: ACM.

17.

Datta

Joshi

Wang

(2006) Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach. European Conference on Computer Vision, Graz, Austria, 7–13 May, pp. 288–301. Berlin: Springer.

18.

Delp

Jones

(1996) Communicating information to patients: The use of cartoon illustrations to improve comprehension of instructions. Academic Emergency Medicine 3: 264–270.

19.

Department of Conservation (2005) Interpretation Handbook and Standard. Wellington: Department of Conservation.

20.

Evans

Durant

(1995) The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science 4: 57–74.

21.

Findlay

(2016) Taking photographs to enhance student teachers’ learning of primary science. Science Teacher Education 76: 21–30.

22.

Fletcher

(2019) Travelling Towards 2050: Climate Change, Storytelling and the Future of Travel. Dunedin: University of Otago.

23.

Frankel

(2001) Communicating science through photography. Journal of Chemical Education 78: 1312.

24.

Frankel

DePace

(2012) Visual Strategies: A Practical Guide to Graphics for Scientists & Engineers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

25.

Glikman

Vaske

Bath

Ciucci

Boitani

(2012) Residents’ support for wolf and bear conservation: The moderating influence of knowledge. European Journal of Wildlife Research 58: 295–302.

26.

Ham

Weiler

(2006) Development of a Research-Based Tool for Evaluating Interpretation. Gold Coast, QLD, Australia: CRC for Sustainable Tourism Gold Coast.

27.

Hansen

Machin

(2013) Researching visual environmental communication. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture 7: 151–168.

28.

Henkes

(1975) Photography toward painting. Design 76: 17–20.

29.

Houts

Doak

Loscalzo

(2006) The role of pictures in improving health communication: A review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Education and Counseling 61: 173–190.

30.

Husain

Roy

Trak

(2017) Photography as a conservation tool in science. Trends in Biosciences 10: 9317–9321.

31.

Hvenegaard

(2017) Visitors’ perceived impacts of interpretation on knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions at Miquelon Lake Provincial Park, Alberta, Canada. Tourism and Hospitality Research 17: 79–90.

32.

Hvenegaard

Dearden

(1998) Ecotourism versus tourism in a Thai National Park. Annals of Tourism Research 25: 700–720.

33.

Hwang

S-N

Lee

Chen

H-J

(2005) The relationship among tourists’ involvement, place attachment and interpretation satisfaction in Taiwan’s national parks. Tourism Management 26: 143–156.

34.

Ismail

(2008) The Role of Interpretive Signage in Enhancing Conservation Knowledge, Awareness and Behaviour among Visitors at the Penang National Park. Kuala Lumpur: Universti Putra Malaysia.

35.

Jacobi

Schiele

(1989) Scientific imagery and popularized imagery: Differences and similarities in the photographic portraits of scientists. Social Studies of Science 19: 731–753.

36.

Kalogiannakis

Papadakis

(2017) Combining mobile technologies in environmental education: A Greek case study. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation 11: 108–130.

37.

Kuo

(2002) The effectiveness of environmental interpretation at resource-sensitive tourism destinations. International Journal of Tourism Research 4: 87–101.

38.

Lambert

Wildt

Durand

(1990) Assessing sampling variation relative to number-of-factors criteria. Educational and Psychological Measurement 50: 33–48.

39.

Levie

(1987) Research on pictures: A guide to the literature. In: Willows

Houghton

(eds) The Psychology of Illustration, Vol. 1. New York: Springer, pp. 1–50.

40.

Levie

Lentz

(1982) Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. ECTJ 30: 195–232.

41.

McComas

Besley

Steinhardt

(2014) Factors influencing US consumer support for genetic modification to prevent crop disease. Appetite 78: 8–14.

42.

Macedo-Rouet

Rouet

J-F

Epstein

Fayard

(2003) Effects of online reading on popular science comprehension. Science Communication 25: 99–128.

43.

Medved

Oatley

(2000) Memories and scientific literacy: Remembering exhibits from a science centre. International Journal of Science Education 22: 1117–1132.

44.

Mihaly

Hermanson

(2001) Intrinsic motivation in museums: Why does one want to learn? In: Hooper-Greenhill

(ed.) The Educational Role of the Museum, London; New York: Routledge, pp. 146–160.

45.

Munro

Morrison-Saunders

Hughes

(2008) Environmental interpretation evaluation in natural areas. Journal of Ecotourism 7: 1–14.

46.

National Bureau of Statistics of China (2017) China statistical yearbook 2017. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2017/indexch.htm

47.

O’Connell

Nichols

Karanth

(2010) Camera Traps in Animal Ecology: Methods and Analyses. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.

48.

Pallant

(2013) SPSS Survival Manual. London: McGraw-Hill Education.

49.

Patel

Eisemon

Arocha

(1990) Comprehending instructions for using pharmaceutical products in rural Kenya. Instructional Science 19: 71–84.

50.

Province of Nova Scotia (2008) Outdoor interpretive signage: Your guide to connecting people & places. https://tourismns.ca/sites/default/files/2017-01/interpretive_guide_0.pdf

51.

Redi

Povoa

(2013) The role of visual attention in the aesthetic appeal of consumer images: A preliminary study. In: VCIP 2013: IEEE conference on visual communications and image processing, Kuching, 17–20 November, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.

52.

Renninger

Hidi

Krapp

Renninger

(2014) The Role of Interest in Learning and Development. New York: Psychology Press.

53.

Scherer

Schorr

Johnstone

(2001) Appraisal theory: Overview assumptions varieties. In: Scherer

Schorr

Johnstone

(eds) Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–34.

54.

Schifanella

Redi

Aiello

(2015) An image is worth more than a thousand favorites: Surfacing the hidden beauty of flickr pictures. ICWSM 2015: 397–406.

55.

Scholtz

Kruger

Saayman

(2013) Understanding the reasons why tourists visit the Kruger National Park during a recession. Professional Accountant 13: 168.

56.

Seo

Chae

Lee

(2012) The impact of human brand image appeal on visual attention and purchase intentions at an e-commerce website. In: Asian conference on intelligent information and database systems, pp. 1–9. Springer. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-642-28493-9_1

57.

Serafini

(2011) Expanding perspectives for comprehending visual images in multimodal texts. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 54: 342–350.

58.

Sharma

Gupta

(2020) Pro-environmental behaviour among tourists visiting national parks: Application of value-belief-norm theory in an emerging economy context. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 25: 829–840.

59.

Sharpe

(2015) Your chi-square test is statistically significant: Now what? Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 20: 8.

60.

Silvia

(2005) Emotional responses to art: From collation and arousal to cognition and emotion. Review of General Psychology 9: 342–357.

61.

Slykhuis

Wiebe

Annetta

(2005) Eye-tracking students’ attention to PowerPoint photographs in a science education setting. Journal of Science Education and Technology 14: 509–520.

62.

Statista (2018) Instagram – Statistics & facts. Available at: https://www.statista.com/topics/1882/instagram/#:~:text=As%20of%20June%202018%2C%20the, market%20based%20on%20audience%20size.

63.

Tilden

(2009) Interpreting Our Heritage. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

64.

Tisdell

Wilson

(2004) The public’s knowledge of and support for conservation of Australia’s tree-kangaroos and other animals. Biodiversity & Conservation 13: 2339–2359.

65.

Tubb

(2003) An evaluation of the effectiveness of interpretation within Dartmoor National Park in reaching the goals of sustainable tourism development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 11: 476–498.

66.

Van der Merwe

Saayman

(2008) Travel motivations of tourists visiting Kruger National Park. Koedoe 50: 154–159.

67.

Van Dijck

(2008) Digital photography: Communication, identity, memory. Visual Communication 7: 57–76.

68.

Zhao

Z-J

(2001) A Handbook of the Birds of China. Jilin: Jilin Science and Technology Press.

69.

Zhejiang University (2017) Studying at Zhejiang University. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20130103112812/http://www.zju.edu.cn:80/c2032628/catalog.html

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.11 MB