Exploring factors associated with participation in citizen science among UK museum visitors aged 40–60: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the capability opportunity motivation-behaviour model

Abstract

Citizen science has grown as a form of public engagement in science. Middle-aged citizens who are already consuming scientific information should be a potential outreach group. Behaviour change research in citizen science participation among the demographic is lacking. A total of 47 museum visitors aged 40–60 years took part in qualitative questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis with the aid of theoretical domains framework and capability opportunity motivation-behaviour model revealed eight themes: (1) limited awareness of citizen science; (2) curiosity, competence and other significant characteristics and skills; (3) important beliefs about one’s capability; (4) importance of clear project purpose and impacts; (5) interest, enjoyment and incentives; (6) lasting impacts of family upbringing; (7) project details that make participation easy, better project promotion; and (8) the living environment, availability of free time and money. Addressing a maximum number of these factors with behaviour change techniques can improve the likelihood of citizen science participation.

Keywords

behaviour change citizen science COM-B public participation science communication theoretical domains framework

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

Russell

Vauclair

C-M

Swift

(2011) Ageism in Europe – Findings from the European social survey. Available at: www.eurage.com (accessed 9 July 2019).

Almeida

Kashdan

Coelho

Albino-Teixeira

Soares-da-Silva

(2008) Healthy subjects volunteering for Phase I studies: Influence of curiosity, exploratory tendencies and perceived self-efficacy. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 46(3): 109–118.

Atkins

Francis

Islam

O’Connor

Patey

Ivers

, et al. (2017) A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implementation Science 12(1): 77.

Ballard

Dixon

CGH

Harris

(2017) Youth-focused citizen science: Examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation. Biological Conservation 208: 65–75.

Bonney

Phillips

Ballard

Enck

(2016) Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science 25(1): 2–16.

Crall

Kosmala

Cheng

Brier

Cavalier

Henderson , et al. (2017) Volunteer recruitment and retention in online citizen science projects using marketing strategies: Lessons from Season Spotter. Journal of Science Communication 16(01): A01.

Croezen

Haveman-Nies

Alvarado

Van’t Veer

De Groot

CPGM

(2009) Characterization of different groups of elderly according to social engagement activity patterns. The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging 13(9): 776–781.

Dickinson

Shirk

Bonter

Bonney

Crain

Martin

, et al. (2012) The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6): 291–297.

DITOs Consortium (2016) Doing it together science: D3.1 DITOs WEB. London. Available at: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1540244/1/ditos-d3.1-20170130.pdf (accessed 18 August 2019).

10.

Eriksen

(2015) Small Places, Large Issues : An Introduction to Social and Cultural Anthropology, 4th edn. London: Pluto Press.

11.

Füchslin

Schäfer

Metag

(2019) Who wants to be a citizen scientist? Identifying the potential of citizen science and target segments in Switzerland. Public Understanding of Science 28(6): 652–668.

12.

Gale

Heath

Cameron

Rashid

Redwood

(2013) Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology 13: 117.

13.

Geoghegan

Dyke

Pateman

West

Everett

(2016) Understanding motivations for citizen science final report on behalf of the UK environmental observation framework by. Available at: www.ukeof.org.uk (accessed 31 July 2019).

14.

Glanville

Paxton

Wang

(2016) Social capital and generosity: A multilevel analysis 45(3): 526–547.

15.

Haklay

(2013) Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation. In: Sui

Elwood

Goodchild

(eds) Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 105–122.

16.

Haklay

(2016) Why is participation inequality important? In: Capineri

Haklay

Huang

Antoniou

Kettunen

Ostermann

, et al. (eds) European Handbook of Crowdsourced Geographic Information. London: Ubiquity Press, pp. 35–44.

17.

Haywood

Parrish

Dolliver

(2016) Place-based and data-rich citizen science as a precursor for conservation action. Conservation Biology 30(3): 476–486.

18.

Herodotou

Aristeidou

Miller

Heidi

Lucy

(2020) What do we know about young volunteers? An exploratory study of participation in Zooniverse. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 5(1): 2.

19.

Hill

(2009) Can a small-changes approach help address the obesity epidemic? A report of the Joint Task Force of the American Society for Nutrition, Institute of Food Technologists, and International Food Information Council. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 89(2): 477–484.

20.

Huijg

Gebhardt

Crone

Dusseldorp

Presseau

(2014) Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research. Implementation Science 9: 11.

21.

Huxhold

Miche

Schüz

(2014) Benefits of having friends in older ages: Differential effects of informal social activities on well-being in middle-aged and older adults. Journals of Gerontology – Series B 69(3): 366–375.

22.

Israel

Beaulieu

Hartless

(2001) The influence of family and community social capital on educational achievement*. Rural Sociology 66(1): 43–68.

23.

Lave

Wenger

(1991) Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Lee

Crowston

Harandi

Osterlund

Miller

(2018) Appealing to different motivations in a message to recruit citizen scientists: Results of a field experiment. Journal of Science Communication 17(1): A02.

25.

Legh-Jones

Moore

(2012) Network social capital, social participation, and physical inactivity in an urban adult population. Social Science & Medicine 74(9): 1362–1367.

26.

Lewandowski

Caldwell

Elmquist

Oberhauser

(2017) Public perceptions of citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 2(1): 3.

27.

Lorke

Golumbic

Ramjan

Atias

(2019) Training needs and recommendations for Citizen Science participants, facilitators and designers. COST Action 15212 Report, 15 November. Available at: https://nhm.openrepository.com/handle/10141/622589

28.

McKinley

Miller-Rushing

Ballard

Bonney

Brown

Evans

, et al. (2017) Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation 208: 15–28.

29.

Michie

van Stralen

West

(2011) The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science 6: 42.

30.

Michie

West

Campbell

Brown

Gainforth

(2014) ABC of Behaviour Change Theories, 1st edn. London: Silverback Publishing.

31.

Miller-Rushing

Primack

Bonney

(2012) The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6): 285–290.

32.

Moghavvemi

Salleh

NAM

Sulaiman

Abessi

(2015) Effect of external factors on intention-behaviour gap. Behaviour & Information Technology 34(12): 1171–1185.

33.

Nielsen

(2006) The 90-9-1 rule for participation inequality in social media and online communities. Available at: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/participation-inequality/ (accessed 3 August 2019).

34.

Oxford English Dictionary (2002) Middle age, 3rd edn. Oxford English Dictionary. Available at: https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/118142?redirectedFrom=middle+age#eid (accessed 9 July 2019).

35.

Pope

Ziebland

Mays

(2000) Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal 320(7227): 114–116. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25186804 (accessed 24 July 2019).

36.

Service

Hallsworth

Halpern

Algate

Gallagher

Nguyen

, et al. (2014) EAST four simple ways to apply behavioural insights. Available at: https://www.behaviouralinsights.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/BIT-Publication-EAST_FA_WEB.pdf (accessed 25 July 2019).

37.

Shirk

Ballard

Wilderman

Phillips

Wiggins

Jordan

, et al. (2012) Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society 17(2): 29–48.

38.

Slattery

Finnegan

Vidgen

(2019) Creating compassion: How volunteering websites encourage prosocial behaviour. Information and Organization 29(1): 57–76.

39.

Southby

South

(2016) Volunteering, inequalities and barriers to volunteering: A rapid evidence review. Available at: http://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/3434/1/Barrierstovolunteering–final21stNovember2016.pdf

40.

Varner

(2014) Scientific outreach: Toward effective public engagement with biological science. BioScience 64(4): 333–340.

41.

Webber

O’Neill

(2019) Average household income, UK: Financial year ending 2018. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/personalandhouseholdfinances/incomeandwealth/bulletins/householddisposableincomeandinequality/yearending2018#analysis-of-average-income (accessed 4 August 2019).

42.

West

Pateman

(2016) Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: What can be learned from the volunteering literature? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 1(2): 1–10.

43.

West

Dyke

Pateman

(2016a) Why do people take part in citizen science? Available at: https://www.sei.org/featured/why-do-people-take-part-in-citizen-science/ (accessed 7 December 2018).

44.

West

Pateman

Dyke

(2016b) Data submission in citizen science projects report for DEFRA (project number PH0475). Available at: https://www.york.ac.uk/media/sei/documents/publications/projectreports/West-Pateman-Dyke-DEFRA-Data-Submission-in-Citizen-Science-Projects.pdf (accessed 17 August 2019).

45.

Youssim

Hank

Litwin

(2015) The role of family social background and inheritance in later life volunteering: Evidence from SHARE-Israel 37(1): 3–17.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.49 MB