Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-2
Exploring factors associated with participation in citizen science among UK museum visitors aged 40–60: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the capability opportunity motivation-behaviour model
Citizen science has grown as a form of public engagement in science. Middle-aged citizens who are already consuming scientific information should be a potential outreach group. Behaviour change research in citizen science participation among the demographic is lacking. A total of 47 museum visitors aged 40–60 years took part in qualitative questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis with the aid of theoretical domains framework and capability opportunity motivation-behaviour model revealed eight themes: (1) limited awareness of citizen science; (2) curiosity, competence and other significant characteristics and skills; (3) important beliefs about one’s capability; (4) importance of clear project purpose and impacts; (5) interest, enjoyment and incentives; (6) lasting impacts of family upbringing; (7) project details that make participation easy, better project promotion; and (8) the living environment, availability of free time and money. Addressing a maximum number of these factors with behaviour change techniques can improve the likelihood of citizen science participation.
AbramsDRussellPSVauclairC-MSwiftHJ (2011) Ageism in Europe – Findings from the European social survey. Available at: www.eurage.com (accessed 9 July 2019).
2.
AlmeidaLKashdanTBCoelhoRAlbino-TeixeiraASoares-da-SilvaP (2008) Healthy subjects volunteering for Phase I studies: Influence of curiosity, exploratory tendencies and perceived self-efficacy. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics46(3): 109–118.
3.
AtkinsLFrancisJIslamRO’ConnorDPateyAIversN, et al. (2017) A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implementation Science12(1): 77.
4.
BallardHLDixonCGHHarrisEM (2017) Youth-focused citizen science: Examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation. Biological Conservation208: 65–75.
5.
BonneyRPhillipsTBBallardHLEnckJW (2016) Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?Public Understanding of Science25(1): 2–16.
6.
CrallAKosmalaMChengRBrierJCavalierDHenderson, et al. (2017) Volunteer recruitment and retention in online citizen science projects using marketing strategies: Lessons from Season Spotter. Journal of Science Communication16(01): A01.
7.
CroezenSHaveman-NiesAAlvaradoVJVan’t VeerPDe GrootCPGM (2009) Characterization of different groups of elderly according to social engagement activity patterns. The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging13(9): 776–781.
8.
DickinsonJLShirkJBonterDBonneyRCrainRMartinJ, et al. (2012) The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment10(6): 291–297.
EriksenTH (2015) Small Places, Large Issues : An Introduction to Social and Cultural Anthropology, 4th edn.London: Pluto Press.
11.
FüchslinTSchäferMSMetagJ (2019) Who wants to be a citizen scientist? Identifying the potential of citizen science and target segments in Switzerland. Public Understanding of Science28(6): 652–668.
12.
GaleNKHeathGCameronERashidSRedwoodS (2013) Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology13: 117.
13.
GeogheganHDykeAPatemanRWestSEverettG (2016) Understanding motivations for citizen science final report on behalf of the UK environmental observation framework by. Available at: www.ukeof.org.uk (accessed 31 July 2019).
14.
GlanvilleJLPaxtonPWangY (2016) Social capital and generosity: A multilevel analysis45(3): 526–547.
15.
HaklayM (2013) Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation. In: SuiDElwoodSGoodchildM (eds) Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 105–122.
16.
HaklayM (2016) Why is participation inequality important? In: CapineriCHaklayMHuangHAntoniouAKettunenJOstermannF, et al. (eds) European Handbook of Crowdsourced Geographic Information. London: Ubiquity Press, pp. 35–44.
17.
HaywoodBKParrishJKDolliverJ (2016) Place-based and data-rich citizen science as a precursor for conservation action. Conservation Biology30(3): 476–486.
18.
HerodotouCAristeidouMMillerGHeidiBLucyR (2020) What do we know about young volunteers? An exploratory study of participation in Zooniverse. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice5(1): 2.
19.
HillJO (2009) Can a small-changes approach help address the obesity epidemic? A report of the Joint Task Force of the American Society for Nutrition, Institute of Food Technologists, and International Food Information Council. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition89(2): 477–484.
20.
HuijgJMGebhardtWACroneMRDusseldorpEPresseauJ (2014) Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research. Implementation Science9: 11.
21.
HuxholdOMicheMSchüzB (2014) Benefits of having friends in older ages: Differential effects of informal social activities on well-being in middle-aged and older adults. Journals of Gerontology – Series B69(3): 366–375.
22.
IsraelGDBeaulieuLJHartlessG (2001) The influence of family and community social capital on educational achievement*. Rural Sociology66(1): 43–68.
LeeTKCrowstonKHarandiMOsterlundCMillerG (2018) Appealing to different motivations in a message to recruit citizen scientists: Results of a field experiment. Journal of Science Communication17(1): A02.
25.
Legh-JonesHMooreS (2012) Network social capital, social participation, and physical inactivity in an urban adult population. Social Science & Medicine74(9): 1362–1367.
26.
LewandowskiECaldwellWElmquistDOberhauserK (2017) Public perceptions of citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice2(1): 3.
27.
LorkeJGolumbicYNRamjanCAtiasO (2019) Training needs and recommendations for Citizen Science participants, facilitators and designers. COST Action 15212 Report, 15 November. Available at: https://nhm.openrepository.com/handle/10141/622589
28.
McKinleyDCMiller-RushingAJBallardHLBonneyRBrownHEvansDM, et al. (2017) Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation208: 15–28.
29.
MichieSvan StralenMMWestR (2011) The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science6: 42.
Miller-RushingAPrimackRBonneyR (2012) The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment10(6): 285–290.
32.
MoghavvemiSSallehNAMSulaimanAAbessiM (2015) Effect of external factors on intention-behaviour gap. Behaviour & Information Technology34(12): 1171–1185.
PopeCZieblandSMaysN (2000) Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal320(7227): 114–116. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25186804 (accessed 24 July 2019).
ShirkJLBallardHLWildermanCCPhillipsTWigginsAJordanR, et al. (2012) Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society17(2): 29–48.
38.
SlatteryPFinneganPVidgenR (2019) Creating compassion: How volunteering websites encourage prosocial behaviour. Information and Organization29(1): 57–76.
WestSPatemanR (2016) Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: What can be learned from the volunteering literature?Citizen Science: Theory and Practice1(2): 1–10.
YoussimIHankKLitwinH (2015) The role of family social background and inheritance in later life volunteering: Evidence from SHARE-Israel37(1): 3–17.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
