This study examines the knowledge gap hypothesis in the United States and Singapore in the context of nanotechnology. This study proposes that academic discipline serves as a better indicator than education levels in predicting nanotechnology knowledge gaps. To reflect the contemporary media landscape, this study examines how attention to online media and documentaries alongside traditional news outlets affect individuals’ nanotechnology knowledge. In both countries, online media and documentaries, as well as traditional news outlets, were related to nanotechnology knowledge to various extents. While the knowledge gap hypothesis was not observed in Singapore, results revealed that increased media attention and interpersonal discussion widened knowledge gaps between individuals from science and non-science disciplines in the United States. Education levels failed to reveal a consistent moderation effect. Taken together, the interaction analyses revealed that academic discipline predicted nanotechnology knowledge gaps more consistently than education levels in the United States. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
AllumNSturgisPTabouraziDBrunton-SmithI (2008) Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science17: 35–54.
2.
BaumMA (2005) Talking the vote: Why presidential candidates hit the talk show circuit. American Journal of Political Science49: 213–234.
BonfadelliH (2002) The Internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. European Journal of Communication17: 65–84.
8.
BuykxPGilliganCWardBKippenRChapmanK (2015) Public support for alcohol policies associated with knowledge of cancer risk. International Journal of Drug Policy26(4): 371–379.
9.
CacciatoreMAScheufeleDACorleyEA (2014) Another (methodological) look at knowledge gaps and the Internet’s potential for closing them. Public Understanding of Science23(4): 376–394.
10.
CarrJP (2017) Evolution education and state politics. BioScience67(8): 687.
De ZunigaHGJungNValenzuelaS (2012) Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17: 319–336.
13.
DeFleurML (1987) The growth and decline of research on the diffusion of the news, 1945–1985. Communication Research14: 109–130.
14.
DonohueGATichenorPJOlienCN (1975) Mass media and the knowledge gap: A hypothesis reconsidered. Communication Research2(1): 3–23.
FalkJHStorksdieckMDierkingLD (2007) Investigating public science interest and understanding: Evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Understanding of Science16(4): 455–469.
17.
FiskeKFitzgeraldRCokleyJ (2014) Controversial new sciences in the media: Content analysis of global reporting of nanotechnology during the last decade. Media International Australia150(1): 156–166.
18.
FriedmanSMEgolfBP (2005) Nanotechnology risks and the media. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine24(4): 5–11.
19.
GaskellGTen EyckTJacksonJVeltriG (2005) Imagining nanotechnology: Cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States. Public Understanding of Science14(1): 81–90.
20.
GazianoC (2010) Notes on “Revisiting the knowledge gap hypothesis: A meta-analysis of thirty-five years of research.”Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly87: 615–632.
21.
GriffinRJ (1990) Energy in the 80s—Education, communication, and the knowledge gap. Journalism Quarterly67: 554–566.
HoSS (2012) The knowledge gap hypothesis in Singapore: The roles of socioeconomic status, mass media, and interpersonal discussion on public knowledge of the H1N1 flu pandemic. Mass Communication and Society15(5): 695–717.
25.
HoSSBrossardDScheufeleDA (2007) The polls—Trends: Public reactions to global health threats and infectious diseases. Public Opinion Quarterly71(4): 671–692.
26.
HoSSScheufeleDACorleyEA (2010) Making sense of policy choices: Understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research12(8): 2703–2715.
27.
HoSSBrossardDScheufeleDA (2008) Effects of value predispositions, mass media use, and knowledge on public attitudes toward embryonic stem cell research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research20(2): 171–192.
28.
HoSSLeongADLooiJChuahASF (2019) Online, offline, or word-of-mouth? Complementary media usage patterns and credibility perceptions of nuclear energy information in Southeast Asia. Energy Research & Social Science48: 46–56.
29.
HoSSPehXSohVWL (2013) The cognitive mediation model: Factors influencing public knowledge of the H1N1 pandemic and intention to take precautionary behaviors. Journal of Health Communication18(7): 773–794.
30.
HoSSScheufeleDACorleyEA (2011) Value predispositions, mass media, and attitudes toward nanotechnology: The interplay of public and experts. Science Communication33(2): 167–200.
31.
HwangYJeongS (2009) Revisiting the knowledge gap hypothesis: A meta-analysis of thirty-five years of research. Journal & Mass Communication Quarterly86(3): 513–532.
32.
IshikawaYNishiuchiHHayashiHViswanathK (2012) Socioeconomic status and health communication inequalities in Japan: A nationwide cross-sectional survey. PLoS ONE7(7): e40664.
33.
KatzELazarsfeldP (1955) Personal Influence. New York, NY: The Free Press.
34.
LadwigPDalrympleKEBrossardDScheufeleDACorleyEA (2012) Perceived familiarity or factual knowledge? Comparing operationalizations of scientific understanding. Science and Public Policy39: 761–774.
35.
LeeEWJHoSS (2015) The perceived familiarity gap hypothesis: Examining how media attention and reflective integration relate to perceived familiarity with nanotechnology in Singapore. Journal of Nanoparticle Research17: 228.
36.
LeeKY (2000) From Third World to First, Singapore. Singapore: Times Editions; Singapore Press Holdings.
37.
LiangXHoSSBrossardDXenosMAScheufeleDAAndersonAA, et al. (2015) Value predispositions as perceptual filters: Comparing of public attitudes toward nanotechnology in the United States and Singapore. Public Understanding of Science24(5): 582–600.
MoyPXenosMAHessVK (2005) Communication and citizenship: Mapping the political effects of infotainment. Mass Communication and Society8(2): 111–131.
42.
National Archives of Singapore (2005) Speech by Mr Goh Chok Tong, Senior Minister, at the 5th anniversary dinner of TODAY newspaper, 31October2005, 8.30pm at Tower Ballroom, Shangri-la Hotel. Available at: https://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/data/pdfdoc/20051031995.htm
NewmanNFletcherRKalogeropoulosALevyDANielsenRK (2017) Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. Available at: http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/
45.
NisbetMCScheufeleDA (2009) What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany96(10): 1767–1778.
46.
PaternosterRBrameRMazerollePPiqueroA (1998) Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology36(4): 859–866.
RetzbachAMarschallJRahnkeMOttoLMaierM (2011) Public understanding of science and the perception of nanotechnology: The roles of interest in science, methodological knowledge, epistemological beliefs, and beliefs about science. Journal of Nanoparticle Research13(12): 6231–6244.
49.
SchoenfeldAH (2010) How We Think: A Theory of Goal-Oriented Decision Making and Its Educational Applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
50.
SlaterMDHayesAFReinekeJBLongMBettinghausEP (2009) Newspaper coverage of cancer prevention: Multilevel evidence for knowledge-gap effects. Journal of Communication59(3): 514–533.
ViswanathKAckersonLK (2011) Race, ethnicity, language, social class, and health communication inequalities: A nationally-representative cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE6(1): e14550.
58.
ViswanathKBreenNMeissnerHMoserRPHesseBSteeleWR, et al. (2006) Cancer knowledge and disparities in the information age. Journal of Health Communication11: 1–17.
59.
WestermanDSpencePRvan der HeideB (2014) Social media as information source: Recency of updates and credibility of information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19: 171–183.
60.
YangXDHoSS (2017) Decreasing the knowledge gap among different socioeconomic status groups on the issue of climate change. Environmental Hazards16(30): 276–290.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
