Scientists have sought to uncover the genetic bases of many diseases and disorders. In response, scholars defined “geneticization” to describe genetic infiltration of understandings of health and illness. In our research, we interviewed 63 individuals in addiction treatment programs to identify what form of geneticization best fits individuals’ description of their own addiction. Individuals’ narratives of their lives, which include family history and are influenced by cultural and structural factors, affect respondents’ reactions to a potential genetic basis of addiction. Most who had a family history of addiction subscribed to a notion that addiction “runs in families,” while most who lacked a family history of addiction used this fact to reject the notion of genetic inheritance of addiction. We conclude that though we see elements of several different versions of geneticization, Nikolas Rose’s version, that genetics affects peoples’ perceptions of addiction in small but important ways, best describes our respondents’ views.
AbadieRHeaneyK (2015) ‘We can wipe an entire culture’: Fears and promises of DNA biobanking among native Americans. Dialectical Anthropology39: 305–320.
2.
AckerCJ (2010) How crack found a niche in the American ghetto: The historical epidemiology of drug-related harm. Biosocieties5(1): 70–88.
3.
Arribas-AyllonM (2016) After geneticization. Social Science & Medicine159: 132–139.
4.
BierutLJMaddenPAFBreslauNet al. (2007) Novel genes identified in a high density genome wide association study for nicotine dependence. Journal of Human Molecular Genetics16(1): 24–35.
5.
BrekkeOASirnesT (2011) Biosociality, biocitizenship and the new regime of hope and despair: Interpreting ‘portraits of hope’ and the ‘mehmet case.’New Genetics and Society30(4): 347–374.
6.
CallardFRoseDHanifE-Let al. (2010) Holding blame at bay? ‘Gene talk’ in family members’ accounts of schizophrenia aetiology. Biosocieties7(3): 273–293.
7.
CampbellND (2010) Toward a critical neuroscience of ‘addiction.’Biosocieties5(1): 89–104.
8.
ChilibeckGLockMSehdevM (2011) Postgenomics, uncertain futures, and the familiarization of susceptibility genes. Social Science & Medicine72: 1768–1775.
9.
ClarkeAE (2005) Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
ConditCM (2010) Public understandings of genetics and health. Clinical Genetics77: 1–9.
11.
ConradP (2001) Genetic optimism: Framing genes and mental illness in the news. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry25: 225–247.
CoxSMMcKellinW (1999) ‘There’s this thing in our family’: Predictive testing and the construction of risk for Huntington disease. Sociology of Health & Illness21(5): 622–646.
14.
CrispAGelderMGoddardEet al. (2005) Stigmatization of people with mental illnesses: A follow-up study within the changing minds campaign of the royal college of psychiatrists. World Psychiatry4(2): 106–113.
15.
DackisCO’BrienC (2005) Neurobiology of addiction: Treatment and public policy ramifications. Nature Neuroscience8(11): 1431–1436.
16.
DaltonHL (1996) Racial Healing. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
17.
DingelMJKarkazisKKoenigBA (2011) Framing nicotine addiction as a ‘disease of the brain’: Social and ethical consequences. Social Science Quarterly92(5): 1363–1388.
18.
DingelMJOstergrenJHeaneyKet al. (2017) I don’t have to know why it snows, I just have to shovel it!’ Addiction recovery, genetic frameworks, and biological citizenship. Biosocieties12: 568–587.
19.
DrausPJ (2009) Substance abuse and slow-motion disasters: The case of Detroit. Sociological Quarterly50(2): 360–382.
EasterM (2014) Interpreting genetics in the context of eating disorders: Evidence of disease, not diversity. Sociology of Health & Illness36(6): 840–855.
22.
FeatherstoneKAtkinsonPBharadwajAet al. (2006) Risky Relations: Family, Kinship and the New Genetics. New York, NY: Berg.
23.
GelernterJKranzlerHRShervaRet al. (2014) Genome-wide association study of alcohol dependence: Significant findings in African-and European-Americans including novel risk loci. Molecular Psychiatry19(1): 41–49.
24.
GelernterJKranzlerHRShervaRet al. (2015) Genome-wide association study of nicotine dependence in American populations: Identification of novel risk loci in both African-Americans and European-Americans. Biological Psychiatry77(5): 493–503.
25.
GENEVA Consortium (2012) CHRNB3 is more strongly associated with Fagerstrom test for cigarette dependence-based nicotine dependence than cigarettes per day: Phenotype definition changes genome-wide association studies results. Addiction107(11): 2019–2028.
26.
HallE (2005) The ‘geneticisation’ of heart disease: A network analysis of the production of new genetic knowledge. Social Science & Medicine60: 2673–2683.
27.
HammerRRDingelMJOstergrenJEet al. (2012) The experience of addiction as told by the addicted: Incorporating biological understandings into self-story. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry36(4): 712–734.
28.
HartABKranzlerHR (2015) Alcohol dependence genetics: Lessons learned from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and post-GWAS analyses. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research39(8): 1312–1327.
29.
HedgecoeA (2001) Schizophrenia and the narrative of enlightened geneticization. Social Studies of Science31(6): 875–911.
30.
HillTRossCEAngelRJ (2005) Neighborhood disorder, Psychophysiological distress, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior46(2): 170–186.
31.
KeaneH (2002) What’s Wrong with Addiction?New York, NY: New York University Press.
32.
KingKF (2010) Considering Kids: The Nature of Children’s Claims to Justice. London: London School of Economics and Political Science. Available at: http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/2203/1/U613435.pdf
33.
LinkBGPhelanJ (1995) Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. Journal of Health and Social Behavior35: 80–94. DOI: 10.2307/2626958
34.
LippmanA (1992) Led (astray) by genetic maps: The cartography of the human genome and health care. Social Science & Medicine35(12): 1469–1476.
35.
LloydC (2013) The stigmatization of problem drug users: A narrative literature review. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy20(2): 85–95.
36.
LubmanDIYucelMPantelisC (2004) Addiction, a condition of compulsive behaviour? Neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence of inhibitory dysregulation. Addiction99(12): 1491–1502.
37.
McLoydVC (1990) The impact of economic hardship on black families and children: Psychological distress, parenting, and socioemotional development. Child Development61: 311–346.
38.
MeloniM (2014.) Biology without biologism: Social theory in a postgenomic age. Sociology48(4): 731–746.
39.
MorphettKCarterAHallWet al. (2017) Framing tobacco dependence as a ‘brain disease’: Implications for policy and practice. Nicotine & Tobacco Research19(7): 774–780.
40.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (2007) Drugs, Brains and Behavior: The Science of Addiction. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
41.
NovasCRoseN (2000) Genetic risk and the birth of the somatic individual. Economy and Society29(4): 485–513.
42.
OstergrenJEDingelMJMcCormickJBet al. (2014) Unwarranted optimism in media portrayals of genetic research on addiction overshadows critical ethical and social concerns. Journal of Health Communication20: 555–565.
43.
ParensE (2004) Genetic differences and human identities. Hastings Center Report34(1): S4–S35.
44.
PerryP (2001) White means never having to say you’re ethnic—White youth and the construction of ‘cultureless’ identities. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography30(1): 56–91.
45.
PescosolidoBAMartinJKLongJSet al. (2010) ‘A disease like any other’? A decade of change in public reactions to schizophrenia, depression, and alcohol dependence. American Journal of Psychiatry167(11): 1321–1330.
46.
PhelanJCLinkBG (2012) Genetics, addiction, and stigma. In: ChapmanAR (ed.) Genetic Research on Addiction. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 174–194.
47.
ReardonJTallBearK (2012) ‘Your DNA is our history’: Genomics, anthropology, and the construction of whiteness as property. Current Anthropology53(Suppl. 5): S233–S245.
48.
RedonnetBACholletEFombonneLet al. (2011) Tobacco, alcohol, cannabis and other illegal drug use among young adults: The socioeconomic context. Drug and Alcohol Dependence121(3): 231–239.
49.
ReillyMTNoronhaAGoldmanDet al. (2017) Genetic studies of alcohol dependence in the context of the addiction cycle. Neuropharmacology122(Suppl. I): 3–21.
50.
RoseN (2007) The Politics of Life Itself. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
SchomerusGLuchtMHolzingerAet al. (2011) The stigma of alcohol dependence compared with other mental disorders: A review of population studies. Alcohol and Alcoholism46(2): 105–112.
52.
SchreiberRHartrickG (2002) Keeping it together: How women use the biomedical explanatory model to manage the stigma of depression. Issues in Mental Health Nursing23: 91–105.
53.
SchuckitMA (2014) A brief history of research on the genetics of alcohol and other drug use disorders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs75(Suppl. 17): 59–67.
54.
SzalavitzM (2015) Genetics: No more addictive personality. Nature522: S48–S49.
ThorgeirssonTGudbjartssonDFSurakkaIet al. (2010) Sequence variants at CHRNB3-CHRNA6 and CYP2A6 affect smoking behavior. Nature Genetics42(5): 448–453.
57.
TreutleinJRietschelM (2011) Genome-wide association studies of alcohol dependence and substance use disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports13(2): 147–155.
58.
VreckoS (2010) ‘Civilizing technologies’ and the control of deviance. Biosocieties5(1): 36–51.
59.
WeinerKMartinPRichardsMet al. (2017) Have we seen the geneticisation of society? Expectations and evidence. Sociology of Health & Illness39(7): 989–1004.
