Imaginaries of nuclear energy in the Portuguese parliament: Between promise,risk,and democracy

Abstract

This article explores the evolution of the nuclear energy debate and its associated controversies in the Portuguese parliament. The analysis focuses on the dictatorial regime of the New State (from the beginning of the nuclear program in 1951 until the 1974 revolution) and on the democratic period (post-1974). Portugal, as an exporting country of uranium minerals, significantly invested in the development of a national capacity in nuclear research, but never developed an endogenous nuclear power infrastructure. Through the analysis of parliamentary debates, this article characterizes the dynamic evolution of the Portuguese sociotechnical imaginary on nuclear energy and technology interlinked with ambivalent representations, including the promise of nuclear energy as key for the constitution of a technological Nation or as prompting new sociotechnical risks.

Keywords

energy policy governance of science and technology nuclear energy participation in science policy representations of science

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

da Terra

Amigos

(1987) Antes, Durante e Depois de Chernobyl: O Nuclear no Mundo e em Portugal [Before, During and After Chernobyl: Nuclear Energy in the World and in Portugal]. Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Ecologistas.

Beck

(1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE.

Benford

Snow

(2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639.

Bickerstaff

Lorenzoni

Pidgeon

Poortinga

Simmons

(2008) Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: Nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Understanding of Science 17(2): 145–169.

Bush

(1945) Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.

Callon

Lascoumes

Barthe

(2001) Agir dans un monde incertain: Essai sur la démocratie technique [Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy]. Paris: Le Seuil.

Cautela

Cousteau

Hawkes

Bousquet

Clermont

Martin

(1977) O suicídio nuclear Português [The Portuguese Nuclear Suicide]. Lisboa: Socicultur.

Conrad

(1997) Public eyes and private genes: Historical frames, news constructions, and social problems. Social Problems 44(2): 139–154.

Domingos

JJD

(1978) O Absurdo duma opção Nuclear [The Absurdity of the Nuclear Option]. Porto: Edicoes Afrontamento.

10.

Eisenhower

(1953) Atoms for peace speech. Available at: https://www.iaea.org/about/history/atoms-for-peace-speech

11.

FORATOM (2012) What People Really Think about Nuclear Energy. Brussels: European Atomic Forum.

12.

Foucault

(1980) Truth and power. In: Gordon

(ed.) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972–1977. Brighton: The Harvester Press, Ltd, pp. 109–133.

13.

Gamson

Modigliani

(1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology 95(1): 1–37.

14.

Guston

(1999) Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: The role of the office of technology transfer as a boundary organization. Social Studies of Science 29(1): 87–111.

15.

Guston

(1996) Principal-agent theory and the structure of science policy. Science and Public Policy 23(4): 229–240.

16.

Hecht

(1998) The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.

17.

Hecht

(2006) Nuclear ontologies. Constellations 13(3): 320–331.

18.

Jasanoff

(2004) The idiom of co-production. In: Jasanoff

(ed.) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 109–133.

19.

Jasanoff

(2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and The United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Universtiy Press.

20.

Jasanoff

(2011) Constitutional moments in governing science and technology. Science and Engineering Ethics 17(4): 621–638.

21.

Jasanoff

Kim

S-H

(2009) Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47: 119–146.

22.

Jasanoff

Kim

S-H

(2013) Sociotechnical imaginaries and national energy policies. Science as Culture 22(2): 189–196.

23.

Klüver

Nentwich

Peissl

Torgersen

Gloede

Hennen

. (2000) EUROPTA European Participatory Technology Assessment: Participatory Methods in Technology Assessment and Technology Decision-Making. Final Report. Available at: http://cordis.europa.eu/docs/publications/7078/70781441-6_en.pdf (accessed 10 March 2015).

24.

Krajacic

Duic

Carvalho

(2011) How to achieve a 100% RES electricity supply for Portugal? Applied Energy 88(2): 508–517.

25.

Latour

(1987) Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

26.

Mol

(1999) Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In: Law

Hassard

(eds) Actor Network Theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 74–90.

27.

Nunes

Matias

(2004a) Agonistic spaces, contentious politics and the trials of governance: Environmental policies and conflict in Portugal. STAGE (Science, Technology and Governance in Europe) Discussion Paper 21. Coimbra: Centre for Social Studies.

28.

Nunes

Matias

(2004b) Science, Technology and Governance in Portugal. Coimbra: Center for Social Studies.

29.

Nunes

Pereira

Matias

(2004) The BSE crisis in Portugal or how to “domesticate” European regulatory policies. STAGE (Science, Technology and Governance in Europe) Discussion Paper 23. Coimbra: Centre for Social Studies.

30.

Oliveira

JDC

(2002) A Energia Nuclear em Portugal: Uma Esquina da História [Nuclear Energy in Portugal: A Corner of History]. Santarém: O Mirante.

31.

Pereira

Fonseca

PFC

(2013) Carnation atoms: Revolution, democracy and the nuclear option in Portugal. In: Science and democracy network annual meeting, Cambridge, MA, 30 June–2 July.

32.

Pereira

Rodrigues

Carvalho

Nunes

(2008) Parlamento, Conhecimento Científico e Deliberação: Dois estudos de caso no Parlamento Português [Parliament, Scientific Knowledge and Deliberation: Two Case Studies in the Portuguese Parliament]. In: Proceedings of VII ESOCITE, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 28–30 May.

33.

Reiche

Bechberger

(2004) Policy differences in the promotion of renewable energies in the EU member states. Energy Policy 32(7): 843–849.

34.

Rosas

(2003) Pensamento e Acção Politica: Portugal Século XX (1890–1976) [Political Thought and Action: Portugal and the 20th Century (1890–1976)]. Lisboa: Editorial Notícias.

35.

Rothman

Lichter

(1987) Elite ideology and risk perception in nuclear energy policy. The American Political Science Review 81(2): 383–404.

36.

Santos

(1984) A crise e a reconstituição do Estado em Portugal (1974–1984) [Crisis and Reconstitution of the Portuguese State (1974–1984)]. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais 14: 7–29.

37.

Schmidt

(2003) Ambiente no Ecrã: emissões e demissões no serviço público televisivo [The Environment on TV: Broadcasts and dismissals in the public service television]. Lisboa: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.

38.

Schmitter

(1999) Portugal: Do autoritarismo à democracia [Portugal: From Authoritarianism to Democracy]. Lisboa: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.

39.

Sousa

Bettencourt

Oliveira

Sérgio

(1978) Centrais Nucleares Em Portugal: Projecto de Livro Branco [Nuclear Plants in Portugal – The White Book Project]. Lisboa: Ministério da Indústria e Tecnologia.

40.

Teräväinen

Lehtonen

Martiskainen

(2011) Climate change, energy security, and risk—debating nuclear new build in Finland, France and the UK. Energy Policy 39(6): 3434–3442.

41.

Torres

(1977) Centrais Nucleares e Meio Ambiente [Nuclear Plants and the Environment]. Lisboa: Arcádia.

42.

Wood

(1997) Lessons in technology assessment: Methodology and management at OTA. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54(2–3): 145–162.