Societal adaptation to flooding is a critical component of contemporary flood policy. Using content analysis, this article identifies how two major flooding episodes (2009 and 2014) are framed in the Irish broadsheet news media. The article considers the extent to which these frames reflect shifts in contemporary flood policy away from protection towards risk management, and the possible implications for adaptation to living with flood risk. Frames help us make sense of the social world, and within the media, framing is an essential tool for communication. Five frames were identified: flood resistance and structural defences, politicisation of flood risk, citizen as risk manager, citizen as victim and emerging trade-offs. These frames suggest that public debates on flood management do not fully reflect shifts in contemporary flood policy, with negative implications for the direction of societal adaptation. Greater discussion is required on the influence of the media on achieving policy objectives.
AdgerWNBrownKNelsonDBerkesFEakinHFolkeCet al. (2011) Resilience implications of policy responses to climate change. Climate Change2: 757–766.
2.
AdgerNDessaiSGouldenMHulmeMLorenzoniINelsonDet al. (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?Climate Change93: 335–354.
3.
AdgerWNQuinnTLorenzoneIMurphyCSweeneyJ (2012) Changing social contracts in climate-change adaptation. Nature Climate Change3: 330–333.
4.
Attride-StirlingJ (2001) Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research13: 85–405.
5.
BenzieM (2014) Social justice and adaptation in the UK. Ecology and Society19: 39.
6.
BohenskyELeitchA (2014) Framing the flood: A media analysis of themes of resilience in the 2011 Brisbane flood. Regional Environmental Change14: 475–488.
7.
BradfordRO’SullivanJvan der CraatsIKrywkowJRotkoPAaltonenJet al. (2012) Risk perception – Issues for flood management in Europe. Natural Hazards Earth System Science12: 2299–2309.
8.
BurbyRJ (2006) Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: Bringing about wise governmental decisions for hazardous areas. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science604(1): 171–191.
9.
ButlerCPidgeonN (2011) From ‘flood defence’ to ‘flood risk management’: Exploring governance, responsibility, and blame’. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29: 533–547.
10.
CarvalhoABurgessJ (2005) Cultural circuits of climate change in UK broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis25: 1457–1469.
11.
ChettyKDevadasVFlemingJ (2015)The framing of climate change in New Zealand newspapers from June 2009 to June 2010. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand45(1): 1–20.
12.
CoffeyAAtkinsonP (1996) Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
DavisJFrenchT (2008) Blaming victims and survivors: An analysis of post-Katrina print news coverage. Southern Communication Journal73: 243–257.
14.
EfobiKAnierobiC (2013) Impact of flooding on riverine communities: The experience of the Omambala and other areas in Anambra state, Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development4(18): 58–62.
15.
EloSKyngäsH (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing62(1): 107–115.
16.
EntmanRM (1989) How the media affect what people think: An information processing approach. Journal of Politics51: 347–370.
17.
EntmanRM (1991) Framing U.S. Coverage of International News: Contrasts in Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents. Journal of Communication41(4): 6–27.
18.
EntmanRM (1993) Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication43(4): 51–58.
19.
EscobarMDemerittD (2014) Flooding and the framing of risk in British broadsheets, 1985–2010. Public Understanding of Science23(4): 454–471.
20.
EwartJMcLeanH (2014) Ducking for cover in the ‘blame game’: News framing of the findings of two reports into the 2010–11 Queensland floods. Disasters39(1): 166–184.
21.
FewRBrownKTompkinsE (2007) Climate change and coastal management decisions: Insights from Christchurch Bay, UK. Coastal Management35: 255–270.
22.
GamsonAModiglianiA (1987) The changing culture of affirmative action. In: BraungartRGBraungartMM (eds) Research in Political Sociology, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI, pp. 137–177.
23.
GamsonAModiglianiA (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology95(1): 10.
24.
GamsonACroteauDHoynesWSassonT (1992) Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology18: 373–393.
25.
GansH (1979) Deciding what’s news. New York: Patheon.
26.
GavinNTLeonard-MilsomLMontgomeryJ (2011) Climate change, flooding and the media in Britain. Public Understanding of Science20: 422–438.
27.
GoffmanE (1974) Frame Analysis. New York: Free Press.
28.
HajatSEbiKKovatsRMenneBEdwardsSHainesA (2005) The human health consequences of flooding in Europe: A review. Extreme Weather Events and Public Health Responses1: 13–21.
29.
HarriesTPenning-RowsellE (2011) Victim pressure, institutional inertia and climate change adaptation: The case of flood risk. Global Environmental Change21: 188–197.
30.
HsiehHFShannonSE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research15: 1277–1288.
JaspalRNerlichB (2012) When climate science became climate politics: British media representations of climate change in 1988. Public Understanding of Science11: 1–20.
34.
JeffersJ (2011) The Cork city flood of November 2009: Lessons for flood risk management and climate change adaptation at the urban scale. Irish Geography44(1): 61–80.
35.
JeffersJ (2013) Integrating vulnerability analysis and risk assessment in flood loss mitigation: An evaluation of barriers and challenges based on evidence in Ireland. Applied Geography37: 44–51.
36.
JeffersJ (2014) Environmental knowledge and human experience: Using a historical analysis of flooding in Ireland to challenge contemporary risk narratives and develop creative policy alternatives. Environmental Hazards13(3): 229–247.
37.
JohnsonCPriestS (2008) Flood risk management in England: A changing landscape of risk responsibility. Water Resources Development24(4): 513–525.
38.
KahnemanDTverskyA (1984) Choice, values, and frames. American Psychologist39: 314–350.
39.
KahnemanDTverskyA (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica47: 263–291.
40.
KaspersonRERennOSlovicPBrownHEmelEGobleRet al. (1988) The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis8: 177–187.
41.
KitzingerJ (1999) Researching risk and the media. Health, Risk and Society1(1): 55–69.
42.
LallSDeichmannU (2012) Density and disasters: Economics of urban hazard risk. World Bank Research Observer27(1): 74–105.
43.
LeitchABohenskyE (2014) Return to ‘a new normal’: Discourses of resilience to natural disasters in Australian newspapers 2006–2010. Global Environmental Change26: 14–26.
44.
LiaoK (2012) A theory on urban resilience to floods – A basis for alternative planning practices. Ecology and Society17(4): 48.
45.
LudyJKondolfG (2012) Flood risk perception in lands ‘protected’ by 100-year levees. Natural Hazards61: 829–842.
46.
MilesBMorseS (2007) The role of news media in natural disaster risk and recovery. Ecological Economics63: 365–373.
47.
MorseJFieldP (1995) Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
NelsonDAdgerWBrownK (2007) Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework. Annual Review of Environment and Resources32: 395–419.
50.
O’BrienKHaywardBBerkesF (2009) Rethinking social contracts: Building resilience in a changing climate. Ecology and Society14(2): 12.
51.
O’RiordanTNicholsonSMilliganJ (2008) Designing sustainable coastal futures. Twenty-First Century Society3(2): 145–157.
52.
PoberezhskayaM (2015) Media coverage of climate change in Russia: Governmental bias and climate silence. Public Understanding of Science24(1): 96–111.
53.
RinnePNygrenA (2015) From resistance to resilience: Media discourses on urban flood governance in Mexico. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning17: 1–23.
54.
RojeckiA (2009) Political culture and disaster response: The Great Floods of 1927 and 2005. Media Culture Society31(6): 957–976.
55.
ScheufeleDATewksburyD (2007) Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication57: 9–20.
56.
ScottMWhiteIKuhlickeCSteinführerASultanaPThompsonPet al. (2013) Living with flood risk. Planning Theory and Practice14(1): 103–140.
57.
SmithNWJoffeH (2009) Climate change in the British press: The role of the visual. Journal of Risk Research12(5): 647–663.
TapsellSMPenning-RowsellECTunstallSMWilsinTL (2002) Vulnerability to flooding: Health and social dimensions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society360(1796): 1511–1525.
60.
TerpstraTGuttelingJ (2008) Households’ perceived responsibilities in flood risk management in the Netherlands. International Journal of Water Resource Development24(4): 555–565.
61.
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2012) UNISDR: United Nations international strategy for disaster reduction. Available at: http://www.unisdr.org (accessed 25 June 2014).
62.
WilbyRKeenanR (2012) Adapting to flood risk under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography36(3): 348–378.
63.
WilkinsL (2000) Searching for symbolic mitigation: Media coverage of two floods. In: ParkerDJ (ed.) Floods, Vol. II. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 218–244.
64.
WoodM (2015) Paradoxical politics: Emergency, security and the depoliticisation of flooding. Political Studies64(3): 699–718. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.12192.
65.
ZevenbergenCVeerbeekWGersoniusBVan HerkS (2008) Challenges in urban flood management: travelling across spatial and temporal scales. Journal of Flood Risk Management1(2): 81–88.
