People’s attitudes toward climate change differ, and these differences may correspond to distinct patterns of media use and information seeking. However, studies extending analyses of attitude types and their specific media diets to countries beyond the United States are lacking. We use a secondary analysis of survey data from Germany to identify attitudes toward climate change among the German public and specify those segments of the population based on their media use and information seeking. Similar to the Global Warming’s Six Americas study, we find distinct attitudes (Global Warming’s Five Germanys) that differ in climate change–related perceptions as well as in media use and communicative behavior. These findings can help tailor communication campaigns regarding climate change to specific audiences.
AjzenI (1989) Attitude structure and behavior. In: PratkanisARBrecklerSJGreenwaldAG (eds) Attitudes and Persuasion, vol. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 241–274.
2.
ArltDHoppeIWollingJ (2011) Climate change and media usage: Effects on problem awareness and behavioral intentions. International Communication Gazette73(1–2): 45–63. DOI: 10.1177/1748048510386741.
3.
BambergSMöserG (2007) Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology27(1): 14–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002.
4.
BrosiusF (2013) SPSS 21. Heidelberg: mitp.
5.
CabecinhasRLázaroACarvalhoA (2008) Media uses and social representations of climate change. In: CarvalhoA (ed.) Communicating Climate Change. Braga: CECS/Universidade do Minho, pp. 170–189.
6.
DiekmannAPreisendörferP (2003) Green and greenback: The behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society15(4): 441–472. DOI: 10.1177/1043463103154002.
7.
DonkAMetagJKohringMMarcinkowskiF (2012) Framing emerging technologies. Risk perceptions of nanotechnology in the German press. Science Communication34(1): 5–29.
8.
EngelsAHütherOSchäferMHeldH (2013) Public climate-change skepticism, energy preferences and political participation. Global Environmental Change23: 1018–1027. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.008.
HefnerD (2013) “Wie kriegen wir sie ins Boot?” Eine Typologie zur Entwicklung von Kommunikationsstrategien zur Förderung umweltschützen Verhaltens [“How do get them on board?” A typology to develop communication strategies to foster environmental-friendly behavior]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft61(3): 387–405.
12.
LeiserowitzA (2004) Before and after The Day After Tomorrow: A U.S. study of climate change risk perception. Environment46(9): 22–37.
LeiserowitzAMaibachERoser-RenoufCFeinbergGRosenthalS (2015) Climate Change in the American Mind: March 2015. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University and New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, Yale University.
16.
LeiserowitzAMaibachERoser-RenoufCFeinbergGRosenthalSMarlonJ (2014) Global Warming’s Six Americas: October 2014. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University and New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, Yale University.
McCrightAMDunlapRE (2011) Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change21(4): 1163–1172. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003.
19.
MaibachEWLeiserowitzARoser-RenoufCMertzCK (2011) Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns. PLoS ONE6(3): e17571. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017571.
20.
MorrisonMDuncanRSherleyCPartonK (2013) A comparison between attitudes to climate change in Australia and the United States. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management20(2): 87–100. DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2012.762946.
NisbetMCMyersT (2007) The polls trends: Twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opinion Quarterly71(3): 444–470. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfm031.
23.
O’KeefeDJ (1990) Persuasion. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
24.
PetersHPHeinrichsH (2008) Legitimizing climate policy: The ’risk construct’ of global climate change in the German mass media. International Journal of Sustainability Communication3: 14–36.
25.
SampeiYAoyagi-UsuiM (2009) Mass-media coverage, its influence on public awareness of climate-change issues, and implications for Japan’s national campaign to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Global Environmental Change19(2): 203–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.005.
26.
SchäferMS (2012) „Hacktivism“? Online-Medien und Social Media als Instrumente der Klimakommunikation zivilgesellschaftlicher Akteure [“Hacktivism?” Online and social media as tools of climate communication of civil actors]. Forschungsjournal Neue Soziale Bewegungen25(2): 68–77.
27.
SchäferMS (2015) Climate change and the media. In: WrightJD (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, vol. 3, 2nd edn.Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 853–859.
28.
SchäferMSTaddickenM (2015) Mediatized opinion leaders: New patterns of opinion leadership in new media environments?International Journal of Communication 9. Available at: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2778/1351
29.
SchäferMSIvanovaASchmidtA (2014) What drives Media attention for climate change? Explaining issue attention of Australian, German and Indian Print Media from 1996 to 2010. International Communication Gazette76(2): 152–176. DOI: 10.1177/1748048513504169.
30.
SchmidtAIvanovaASchäferMS (2013) Media attention for climate change around the world: A comparative analysis of newspaper coverage in 27 countries. Global Environmental Change23(5): 1233–1248.
31.
SherleyCMorrisonMDuncanRPartonK (2014) Using segmentation and prototyping in engaging politically-salient climate-change household segments. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing26(3): 258–280. DOI: 10.1080/10495142.2014.918792.
32.
SütterlinBBrunnerTASiegristM (2011) Who puts the most energy into energy conservation? A segmentation of energy consumers based on energy-related behavioral characteristics. Energy Policy39(12): 8137–8152. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.008.
33.
TaddickenM (2013) Climate change from the user’s perspective. Journal of Media Psychology25(1): 39–52.
34.
TaddickenMNeverlaI (2011) Klimawandel aus Sicht der Mediennutzer: Multifaktorielles Wirkungsmodell der Medienerfahrung zur komplexen Wissensdomäne Klimawandel [Climate change from the perspective of media users: A multifactorial effects model on media experience with the complex issue climate change]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft59: 505–525.
VicentePReisE (2007) Segmenting households according to recycling attitudes in a Portuguese urban area. Resources, Conservation and Recycling52(1): 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.01.005.
37.
ZhaoX (2009) Media use and global warming perceptions: A snapshot of the reinforcing spirals. Communication Research36(5): 698–723. DOI: 10.1177/0093650209338911.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
