This article presents our study of science coverage in the digital Spanish press over the last decade. We employed automated information retrieval procedures to create a corpus of 50,763 text units dealing with science and technology, and used automated text-analysis procedures in order to provide a general picture of the structure, characteristics and evolution of science news in Spain. We found between 6% and 7% of science coverage, a clear high proportion of biomedicine and predominance of science over technology, although we also detected an increase in technological content during the second half of the decade. Analysing the extrinsic and intrinsic features of science culture, we found a predominance of intrinsic features that still need further analysis. Our attempt to use specialised software to examine big data was effective, and allowed us to reach these preliminary conclusions.
BauerMW (2009) The evolution of public understanding of science – Discourse and comparative evidence. Science, Technology and Society14(2): 221–240.
4.
BauerMWAllumNMillerS (2007) What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science16: 79–95.
5.
BauerMWPetkovaKBoyadjievaPGornevG (2006) Long-term trends in the public representation of science across the ‘iron curtain’: Britain and Bulgaria, 1946–95. Social Studies of Science36(1): 99–131.
6.
BauerMWRagnarsdottirARudolfsdottirADurantJ (1995) Science and Technology in the British Press, 1946–1990: A Systematic Content Analysis of the Press. London: The Science Museum.
7.
BenfordRDSnowDA (2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology26: 611–639.
8.
BenoitGGingrasY (2000) What is scientific and technological culture and how is it measured? A multidimensional model. Public Understanding of Science9: 43–58.
9.
BucchiMMazzoliniRG (2003) Big science, little news: Science in the Italian daily press, 1946–1997. Public Understanding of Science12(1): 7–24.
10.
CarvalhoA (2007) Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science16: 223–242.
11.
CastroPGomesI (2005) Genetically modified organisms in the Portuguese press: Thematisation and anchoring. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour35: 1–18.
12.
ClarkFIllmanD (2006) A longitudinal study of the New York Times Science Times Section. Science Communication27: 496–513.
13.
DimopoulosKKoulaidisV (2002) The socio-epistemic constitution of science and technology in the Greek press: An analysis of its presentation. Public Understanding of Science11(3): 225–241.
14.
DonkAMetagJKohringM. (2012) Framing emerging technologies risk perceptions of nanotechnology in the German press. Science Communication34(1): 5–29.
15.
ElmerCBadenschierFWormerH (2008) Science for everybody? How the coverage of research issues in German newspapers has increased dramatically. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly85(4): 878–893.
16.
FECYT (2011) Percepción social de la ciencia y la tecnología 2010 [Social Perception of Science and Technology in Spain 2010]. Madrid: FECYT.
17.
JaspalRNerlichB (2013) Fracking in the UK press: Threat dynamics in an unfolding debate. Public Understanding of Science23(3): 348–363.
18.
JoachimsT (2002) Learning to Classify Text Using Support Vector Machines – Methods, Theory and Algorithms. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19.
KornblumJ (2006) Identifying almost identical files using context triggered piecewise hashing. Digital Investigation3: 91–97.
KrippendorffK (2004) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
LancichinettiAFortunatoS (2009) Community detection algorithms: A comparative analysis. Physical Review E80(5). Available at: http://arxiv.org/pdf/0908.1062v2.pdf
LeónB (2008) Science related information in European television: A study of prime-time news. Public Understanding of Science (17): 443–460.
25.
López CerezoJACámaraM (2007) Scientific culture and social appropriation of the science. Social Epistemology21(1): 69–81.
26.
MajorAAtwoodE (2004) Environmental risks in the news: Issues, sources, problems, and values. Public Understanding of Science13: 295–308.
27.
Moreno CastroC (2010) Los medios, el público y la ciencia. Una relación que no progresa adecuadamente [The media, the public and science: A relationship which is not advancing adequately]. In: Percepción Social de la Ciencia y la Tecnología en España, 2008 [Social Perception of Science and Technology in Spain, 2008]. Madrid: FECYT.
28.
NovakBMladeničDGrobelnikM (2006) Text classification with active learning. In: From data and information analysis to knowledge engineering: Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation eV, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, 9–11 March 2005, pp. 398–405. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
29.
OlstonCNajorkM (2010) Web crawling. Invited survey article. Journal of Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval4(3): 175–246.
PonsPLatapyM (2005) Computing communities in large networks using random walks. In: Computer and information sciences (ISCIS), pp. 284–293. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0512106
32.
QuintanillaMA (2005) Tecnología: Un enfoque filosófico y otros ensayos de filosofía de la tecnología [Technology: A philosophical approach and other essays on the philosophy of technology]. México, D.F., México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
33.
QuintanillaMA (2012) Cultura, Tecnología e innovación [Culture, Technology and Innovation]. In: AibarEQuintanillaMA (eds) Ciencia, tecnología y sociedad. Enciclopedia Iberoamericana de Filosofía [Science, Technology and Innovation. Iberoamerican Encyclopaedia of Philosophy]. Madrid: Trotta, pp. 103–136.
34.
RaghavanUNAlbertRKumaraS (2007) Near linear time algorithm to detect community structures in large-scale networks. Physical Review E76. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.2938
35.
RosvallMAxelssonDBergstromC (2009) The map equation. European Physical Journal Special Topics178: 13–23.
36.
SaltonGMcGillMJ (1983) Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
37.
SchaferMS (2009) From public understanding of science to public engagement: An empirical assessment of changes in science coverage. Science Communication30(4): 475–505.
38.
SebastianiF (2002) Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys34(1): 1–47.
39.
SuerdemAKBauerMHowardSRubyL (2013) PUS in turbulent times II: A shifting vocabulary that brokers inter-disciplinary knowledge. Public Understanding of Science22(1): 2–15.
40.
ŠuljokABrajdić VukovićM (2013) How the Croatian daily press presents science. News Science & Technology Studies26(1): 92–112.
41.
Vapnik VladimirN (1995) The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
42.
VeltriG (2013) Viva la Nano-Revolución! A semantic analysis of the Spanish national press. Science Communication35: 143–167.
43.
VincentDBlondelVDGuillaumeJLLambiotteRLefebvreE (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 10. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0803.0476
44.
VogtC (2011) The spiral of scientific culture and cultural well-being: Brazil and Ibero-America. Public Understanding of Science21(1): 4–16.
