Unlike other health behaviors, there does not appear to be a strong relationship between perceived skin cancer risk and reduction or cessation of indoor tanning bed use. This study seeks to address this inconsistency by determining how indoor tanning bed users rationalize skin cancer risk with their tanning behavior. Qualitative textual analysis of indoor tanning message board posts (N = 330) revealed varied perceptions of risk, including acknowledging the risk of indoor tanning; denying or downplaying risk, often citing perceived health benefits associated with tanning; blaming outside forces for cancer, such as lotion or genetics; and fatalistic beliefs about cancer. These results highlight the nuanced relationship between perceived skin cancer risk and indoor tanning bed use.
CafriGThompsonJKRoehrigMvan den BergPJacobsenPBStarkS (2006) An investigation of appearance motives for tanning: The development and evaluation of the Physical Appearance Reasons for Tanning Scale (PARTS) and its relation to sunbathing and indoor tanning intentions. Body Image3: 199–209. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.05.002.
ChampionVLSkinnerCS (2008) The health belief model. In: GlanzKRimerBKViswanathK (eds) Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 45–66.
4.
DeSantisAD (2002) Smoke screen: An ethnographic study of a cigar shop’s collective rationalization. Health Communication14: 167–198. DOI: 10.1207/S15327027HC1402_2.
5.
FestingerL (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
FleetJC (2008) Molecular actions of vitamin D contributing to cancer prevention. Molecular Aspects of Medicine29: 388–396. DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2008.07.003.
7.
FreemanSFrancisSLundahlKBowlandTDellavalleRP (2006) UV tanning advertisements in high school newspapers. Archives of Dermatology142: 460–462.
8.
GlaserBGStraussAL (2009) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
9.
GoodenRJWinefieldHR (2007) Breast and prostate cancer online discussion boards. Journal of Health Psychology12: 103–114. DOI: 10.1177/1359105307071744.
10.
GreeneKBrinnLS (2003) Messages influencing college women’s tanning bed use: Statistical versus narrative evidence format and a self-assessment to increase perceived susceptibility. Journal of Health Communication8: 443–461. DOI: 10.1080/713852118.
11.
GreeneKCampoSBanerjeeS (2010) Comparing normative, anecdotal, and statistical risk evidence to discourage tanning bed use. Communication Quarterly58: 111–132. DOI: 10.1080/01463371003773366.
12.
GreenmanJJonesDA (2010) Comparison of advertising strategies between the indoor tanning and tobacco industries. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology62: 685.e1–685.e18. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.02.045.
13.
HillhouseJTurrisiRShieldsAL (2007) Patterns of indoor tanning use: Implications for clinical interventions. Archives of Dermatology143: 1530–1535. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.143.12.1530.
14.
HillhouseJTurrisiRHolwiskiFMcVeighS (1999) An examination of psychological variables relevant to artificial tanning tendencies. Journal of Health Psychology4: 507–516. DOI: 10.1177/135910539900400405.
15.
HillhouseJTurrisiRStapletonJRobinsonJ (2008) A randomized controlled trial of an appearance-focused intervention to prevent skin cancer. Cancer113: 3257–3266. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23922.
16.
HoersterKDGarrowRLMayerJAClappEJWeeksJRWoodruffSI (2009) Density of indoor tanning facilities in 116 large U.S. cities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine36: 243–246. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.10.020.
17.
HsiehHFShannonSE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research15: 1277–1288. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
18.
JacksonKMAikenLS (2000) A psychosocial model of sun protection and sunbathing in young women: The impact of health beliefs, attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy for sun protection. Health Psychology19: 469–478. DOI: 10.1037//0278–6133.19.5.469.
19.
JanzNKBeckerMH (1984) The health belief model: A decade later. Health Education and Behavior11: 1–47. DOI: 10.1177/109019818401100101.
20.
LamannaLM (2004) College students’ knowledge and attitudes about cancer and perceived risks of developing skin cancer. Dermatology Nursing16: 161–176.
21.
LindlofTRTaylorBC (2010) Qualitative Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
MackayHLoweDEdwardsDRogersSN (2007) A survey of 14 to 16 year olds as to their attitude toward and use of sunbeds. Health Education Journal66: 141–152. DOI: 10.1177/0017896907076753.
23.
MosherCEDanoff-BurgS (2010) Addiction to indoor tanning: Relation to anxiety, depression, and substance use. Archives of Dermatology146: 412–417. DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.385.
PoweBDFinnieR (2003) Cancer fatalism: The state of the science. Cancer Nursing26: 454–467.
26.
ReykdalPESmithDL (2009) The truth about the recent IARC report. Looking Fit24: 26–27.
27.
RimalRNRealK (2005) How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: A test of the theory of normative social behavior. Communication Research32: 389–414. DOI: 10.1177/0093650205275385.
28.
SayreRMDowdyJC (2003) Sunbathing vs. indoor tanning: A realistic perspective. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine19: 105–107. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600–0781.2003.00028.x.
29.
SheerVCClineR (1994) The development and validation of a model explaining sexual behavior among college students implications for AIDS communication campaigns. Human Communication Research21: 280–304. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468–2958.1994.tb00348.x.
30.
StraussALCorbinJM (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
31.
TangprichaVTurnerASpinaCDecastroSChenTCHolickMF (2004) Tanning is associated with optimal vitamin D status (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration) and higher bone mineral density. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition80: 1645–1649.
32.
WitteK (1994) Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs61: 113–134.
