Assessing the quality of a deliberative democracy mini-public event about advanced biofuel production and development in Canada

Abstract

The importance of evaluating deliberative public engagement events is well recognized, but such activities are rarely conducted for a variety of theoretical, political and practical reasons. In this article, we provide an assessment of the criteria presented in the 2008 National Research Council report on Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making (NRC report) as explicit indicators of quality for the 2012 ‘Advanced Biofuels’ deliberative democracy event. The National Research Council’s criteria were selected to evaluate this event because they are decision oriented, are the products of an exhaustive review of similar past events, are intended specifically for environmental processes and encompass many of the criteria presented in other evaluation frameworks. It is our hope that the results of our study may encourage others to employ and assess the National Research Council’s criteria as a generalizable benchmark that may justifiably be used in forthcoming deliberative events exploring different topics with different audiences.

Keywords

discourses of science energy policy public consultations public participation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abelson

Blacksher

Boesveld

Goold

(2013) Public Deliberation in Health Policy and Bioethics: Mapping an emerging, interdisciplinary field. Journal of Public Deliberation 9(1): 5.

Burgess

(2014) From ‘trust us’ to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy. Public Understanding of Science 23(1): 48–52.

Einsiedel

Jelsøe

Breck

(2001) Publics at the technology table: The consensus conference in Denmark, Canada, and Australia. Public Understanding of Science 10(1): 83–98.

Fishkin

Luskin

Jowell

(2000) Deliberative polling and public consultation. Parliamentary Affairs 53(4): 657–666.

Goodin

Dryzek

(2006) Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Politics & Society 34: 219–244.

Kahane

Weinstock

Leydet

Williams

(2010) Deliberative Democracy in Practice. Vancouver, BC, Canada: UBC Press.

Longstaff

Burgess

(2010) Recruiting for representation in public deliberation on the ethics of biobanks. Public Understanding of Science 19(2): 212–224.

National Consumer Council (2008) Deliberative public engagement: Nine principles. Available at: http://www.involve.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Deliberative-public-engagement-nine-principles.pdf (accessed 7 May 2013).

National Research Council of the National Academies (2008) Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making (ed Dietz

Stern

). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12434

10.

Powell

Colin

Kleinman

Delborne

Anderson

(2011a) Imagining ordinary citizens? Conceptualized and actual participants for deliberations on emerging technologies. Science as Culture 20(1): 37–70.

11.

Powell

Delborne

Colin

(2011b) Beyond engagement exercises: Exploring the U.S. National Citizens’ technology forum from the bottom-up. Journal of Public Deliberation 7(1): 1–47.

12.

Rask

Worthington

Lammi

(eds) (2012) Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance. London: Earthscan Publications.

13.

Ribeiro

(2013) Beyond commonplace biofuels: Social aspects of ethanol. Energy Policy 57: 355–362.

14.

Rowe

Horlick-Jones

Walls

Pidgeon

(2005) Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: Reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? Public debate about transgenic crops. Public Understanding of Science 14(4): 331–352.

15.

World Bank (2010) Second-generation biofuels: Economics and policies. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/3891/WPS5406.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 31 March 2013).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB