The politics of buzzwords at the interface of technoscience,market and society: The case of ‘public engagement in science’

Abstract

Emerging technologies such as genomics, nanotechnology, and converging technologies are surrounded by a constellation of fashionable stereotyped phrases such as ‘public engagement in science’, ‘responsible innovation’, ‘green technology’, or ‘personalised medicine’. Buzzwords are ubiquitous and used ad libitum by science policy makers, industrial companies in their advertisements, scientists in their research proposals, and journalists. Despite their proliferation in the language of scientific and technological innovation, these buzzwords have attracted little attention among science studies scholars. The purpose of this paper is to try to understand if, and how buzzwords shape the technoscientific landscape. What do they perform? What do they reveal? What do they conceal? Based on a case study of the phrase ‘public engagement in science’, this paper describes buzzwords as linguistic technologies, capable of three major performances: buzzwords generate matters of concern and play an important role in trying to build consensus; they set attractive goals and agendas; they create unstable collectives through noise.

Keywords

nanotechnology personalised medicine public engagement responsible innovation smart technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anastas

Warner

(1998) Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Arnstein

(1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4): 216–224. Available at: http://lithgow-schmidt.dk/sherry-arnstein/ladder-of-citizen-participation.html

Bensaude Vincent

(2009) Les vertiges de la technoscience. Paris: éditions la découverte.

Bensaude Vincent

(2013) Reconfiguring the public of science. In: Baranger

Schiele

(eds) Science Communication Today: International Perspectives, Issues and Strategies. Paris: CNRS editions, pp. 105–118.

Berube

(2006) Nano-Hype: The Truth behind the Nanotechnology Buzz. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

Bonneuil

Joly

Marris

(2008) Disentrenching experiment: The construction of GMO-crop field trials as a social problem. Science, Technology & Human Values 33(2): 201–229.

Broks

(2006) Understanding Popular Science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Bucchi

Trench

(eds) (2008) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London: Routledge.

Burningham

(1998) A noisy road or noisy resident? A demonstration of the utility of social constructivism for analysing environmental problems. Sociological Review 46(3): 536–563.

10.

CAISE (Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education) (2011) Many experts, many audiences: Public engagement with science. Available at: http://caise.insci.org/news/67/51/Many-Experts-Many-Audiences-Public-Engagement-with-Science/d,resources-page-item-detail

11.

Callon

(1999) The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge. Science, Technology & Society 4: 81–94.

12.

Callon

Rabeharisoa

(2008) The growing engagement of emergent concerned groups in political and economic life: Lessons from the French association of neuromuscular disease patients. Science, Technology & Human Values 33(2): 230–261.

13.

Callon

Lascoumes

Barthes

(2001) Agir dans un mode incertain. Essai sur la démocratie technique. Paris: Seuil.

14.

Carlin

Curran

(2012) Cloud computing technologies. International Journal of Cloud Computing and Services Science (IJ-CLOSER) 1(2): 59–65.

15.

Carson

(1962) Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

16.

Colborn

Dumanoski

Myers

(1996) Our Stolen Future: Are We Threatening Our Fertility, Intelligence, and Survival? A Scientific Detective Story. New York: Dutton.

17.

Collins

(2000) Management, Fads and Buzzwords, Critical, Practical Perspectives. London: Routledge.

18.

Cornwall

(2007) Buzzwords and fuzzwords: Deconstructing development discourse. Development in Practice 17(4–5): 471–484.

19.

Epstein

(1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.

20.

Epstein

(2012) Sexual health as buzzword: Competing stakes and proliferating agendas. Brownlee Lecture in Sexuality Studies featuring Steven Epstein. 29 February. Available at: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/gsws/content/%E2%80%9Csexual-health-buzzword-competing-stakes-and-proliferating-agendas%E2%80%9D-brownlee-lecture-sexuali

21.

ETC Group (2005) The Big Down: NanoGeopolitics. Available at: http://www.etcgroup.org/content/special-report-nanogeopolitics-etc-group-surveys-political-landscape

22.

European Commission (2001) Science and Society Action Plan. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/ss_ap_en.pdf

23.

European Commission (2008) Public Engagement in Science. Portuguese Presidency Conference: The Future of Science and Technology in Europe. Lisbon, 8–10 October 2007. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research.

24.

European Commission (2012) Public engagement in science and research. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/index.cfm?fuseaction=public.topic&id=1251

25.

Fayard

(1992) Let’s stop persecuting people who don’t think like Galileo! Public Understanding of Science 1: 15–16.

26.

Felt

(2007) Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously: Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/european-knowledge-society_en.pdf

27.

Felt

Fochler

(2008) The bottom-up meanings of the concept of public participation. Science and Public Policy 35: 489–499.

28.

Felt

Fochler

(2010) Machineries for making publics: Inscribing and de-scribing publics in public engagement. Minerva 48(3): 219–238.

29.

Fill

Mühlhäusler

(eds) (2001) The Ecolinguistics Reader: A Selection of Articles on Language, Ecology and Environment. London: Continuum.

30.

Foucault

([1977] 1980) The confession of the flesh. In: Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, ed. Gordon

New York: Pantheon, pp. 194–228.

31.

Fox Keller

(1995) Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth-century Biology. New York: Columbia University Press.

32.

Fox Keller

(2002) Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

33.

Gibbons

(1999) Science’s new social contract with society. Nature 402: C81–C84.

34.

Godin

(2006) The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology & Human Values 31: 634–667.

35.

Graf

(1993) Greek Mythology: An Introduction. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

36.

Gregory

Agar

Lock

Harris

(2007) Public engagement of science in the private sector: A new form of PR? In: Bauer

Bucchi

(eds) Journalism, Science and Society: Science Communications between News and Public Relations. New York: Routledge, pp. 203–213.

37.

Harré

Brockmeier

Mühlhäusler

(1999) Greenspeak: A Study of Environmental Discourse. London: SAGE.

38.

Irwin

(1995) Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.

39.

Jasanoff

(2003) Technologies of humility. Minerva 41: 223–244.

40.

Jasanoff

(2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

41.

Joss

Durant

(eds) (1995) Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: The Science Museum.

42.

Lakoff

Johnson

(1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

43.

Lengwiler

(2008) Participatory approaches in science and technology: Historical origins and current practices in critical perspective. Science, Technology & Human Values 33(2): 186–200.

44.

Leshner

(2003) Public engagement with science. Science 299(5609): 977.

45.

Lévy-Leblond

(1992) About misunderstandings about misunderstandings. Public Understanding of Science 1(1): 17–21.

46.

Maasen

Weingart

(2000) Metaphors and the Dynamics of Knowledge. London: Routledge.

47.

Nerlich

(2008) Powered by imagination: Nanobots at the Science Photo Library. Science as Culture 17(3): 269–292.

48.

Nerlich

(2012) Biomilitarism and nanomedicine: Evil metaphors for the good of human health? Covalence April. Available at (accessed 26 May 2013): http://www.elca.org/What-We-Believe/Social-Issues/Faith-Science-and-Technology/Covalence/Features/Biomilitarism-and-nanomedicine.aspx

49.

Nowotny

Scott

Gibbons

(2001) Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

50.

Pörksen

(1995) Plastic Words: The Tyranny of a Modular Language. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press. English translation Plastikwörter. Die Sprache einer internationalen Diktatur. 1988, 7th edition, 2011.

51.

Roco

Bainbridge

(2002) Executive summary. In: Roco

Bainbridge

(eds) Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, pp. ix–xii. Available at: http://www.wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/Report/NBIC_pre_publication.pdf

52.

Roy

(2002) Giga science and society. Materials Today 5(12): 72. Available at: www.materialstoday.com/pdfs_5_12/opinion.pdf

53.

Royal Society of London and Royal Academy of Engineering (2004) Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. London: Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering.

54.

Schiele

(2008) On and about the deficit model in an age of free flow. In: Cheng

Claessens

Gascoigne

Metcalfe

Schiele

Shi

(eds) Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices. Berlin: Springer, pp. 93–117.

55.

Serres

(1982) The Parasite, trans. Schehr

. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

56.

Shapin

(1992) Why the public ought to understand science-in-the-making. Public Understanding of Science 1(1): 27–30.

57.

Star

Griesemer

(1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387–420.

58.

Stirling

(2007) ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 33: 262–294.

59.

Sutcliffe

(2011) A Report on Responsible Research & Innovation. Prepared for DG Research and Innovation, European Commission. Available at (accessed 3 December 2012): http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf

60.

Topçu

(2008) Confronting nuclear risks: Counter-expertise as politics within the French nuclear energy debate. Nature & Culture 3(2): 225–245.

61.

Wynne

(1992a) Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science 1(3): 281–304.

62.

Wynne

(1992b) Public understanding of science research: New horizons or hall of mirrors? Public Understanding of Science 1(1): 37–43.

63.

Yuen

(2011) Microsoft: 2012 – The year cloud moves from a buzzword to reality. vmblog.com, 12 December. Available at: http://vmblog.com/archive/2011/12/12/microsoft-2012-the-year-cloud-moves-from-a-buzzword-to-reality.aspx