The images used by the media to represent science can help people’s understanding of complex processes and create meaningful links with audiences. This is particularly relevant in the case of climate change (CC), an important phenomenon that, nevertheless, is often perceived as a remote issue, with no relevance to daily life. This article presents the main results of a research on the images used in television news to represent CC. From a sample of 1476.4 hours of Spanish television news programmes, a content analysis of 78 stories on climate change was carried out. This was complemented with six semi-structured interviews at five TV newsrooms. Results indicate that the low rate of coverage of CC can be related to the scarcity of attractive images available to the channels.
ApariciRGarcíaAFernándezJOsunaS (2009) La imagen. Análisis y representación de la realidad. Barcelona: Gedisa.
2.
BaggaleyJDuckS (1979) Análisis del mensaje televisivo. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
3.
BoholmA (1998) Visual images and risk messages: Commemorating Chernobyl. Risk Decision and Policy3: 125–143.
4.
BoykoffMT (2008) Lost in translation? United States television news coverage of anthropogenic climate change, 1995–2004. Climatic Change86: 1–11.
5.
BoykoffMT (2011) Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BoykoffMTBoykoffJM (2004) Bias as balance: Global warming and the US Prestige Press. Global Environmental Change14(2): 125–136.
7.
BoykoffMTBoykoffJM (2007) Climate change and journalistic norms: A case study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum38(6): 1190–1204.
8.
BoykoffMRobertsJT (2007) Media coverage of climate change: Current trends, strengths, weaknesses. United Nations Development Report, Occasional paper, 2007/3.
CarvalhoA (2007) Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science16: 223–243.
11.
CarvalhoABurgessJ (2005) Cultural circuits of climate change in UK broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis25(6): 1457–1469.
12.
CebrianM (2004) La información en televisión: obsesión mercantil y política. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Fernández del MoralJQuesadaMSánchez ArandaJJLeónBFernándezA (2008) El análisis de la información televisiva. Hacia una medida de la calidad periodística. Madrid: Cie Dossat.
16.
GavinNTMarshallT (2011) Mediated climate change in Britain: Scepticism on the web and television around Copenhagen. Global Environmental Change21(3): 1035–1044.
17.
GiffordR (2008) Psychology’s essential role in climate change. Canadian Psychology/psychologie canadienne49: 273–280.
18.
GrabeMEBucyEP (2009) Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.
19.
GreenbergMRSachsmanDBSandmanPMSalomoneKL (1989) Risk, drama and geography in coverage of environmental risk by network TV. The Journalism Quarterly66(2): 267–276.
20.
HöijerB (2010) Emotional anchoring and objectification in the media reporting on climate change. Public Understanding of Science19(6): 717–731.
21.
HulmeM (2004) Pictures, scenarios or probabilities: how should we portray dangerous climate change?Paper presented at the Perspectives on Dangerous Climate Change conference, 28–29 June, UEA-Norwich, UK.
22.
IPCC. (2007) Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change. New York: United Nations.
23.
La Sexta (2011) La Sexta Noticias. 14September, 14.30 edition.
24.
LesterLCottleS (2009) Visualizing climate change: Television news and ecological citizenship. International Journal of Communication3: 920–936.
25.
LorenzoniINicholson-ColeSWhitmarshL (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change17: 445–459.
26.
ManzoK (2010) Imaging vulnerability: The iconography of climate change. Area42(1): 96–107.
27.
MazurA (2006) Risk perception and news coverage across nations. Risk Management8: 149–171.
28.
McGregorJ (2000) Restating news values: Contemporary criteria for selecting the news. In: Proceedings of the Australian & New Zealand Communication Association. Available at: www.bond.edu.au/hss/communication/ANZCA/papers/JMcGregorPaper.pdf (accessed 10 October 2012).
29.
MeiraPMHartoMHerasFMonteroP (2011) La sociedad ante el cambio climático. Conocimientos, valoraciones y comportamientos en la población española. Madrid: Fundación Mapfre.
30.
Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. (2005) Evaluación Preliminar de los Impactos en España por Efecto del Cambio Climático. Madrid: Centro de publicaciones del Ministerio de Medio Ambiente.
31.
Muñoz TorresJR (2002) Por qué interesan las noticias. Un estudio de los fundamentos del interés informativo. Barcelona: Herder.
32.
Nicholson-ColeS (2005) Representing climate change futures: A critique on the use of images for visual communication. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems29(3): 255–273.
33.
OringSA (1999) A call for visual literacy. School Arts99: 58–59.
34.
PetersenLK (2007) Changing public discourse on the environment: Danish media coverage of the Rio and Johannesburg UN summits. Environmental Politics16(2): 206–230.
35.
PearceF (2010) The Climate Files: The Battle for the Truth about Global Warming. London: Guardian Books.
36.
SheppardS (2005) Landscape visualization and climate change: The potential for influencing perceptions and behavior. Environmental Science & Policy8: 637–654.
37.
SmithNWJoffeH (2009) Climate change in the British press: The role of the visual. Journal of Risk Research12(5): 647–663.
38.
StrömbäckJKarlssonMHopmannDN (2012) Determinants of news content. Journalism Studies13(5–6): 718–728.
39.
UngarS (2000) Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: Climate change versus the ozone hole. Public Understanding of Science9: 297–312.
40.
UngarS (2007) Public scares: Changing the issue culture. in MoserS.C.DillingL (eds) Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.82–89.
41.
VlekC (2000) Essential psychology for environmental policy making. International Journal of Psychology35(2): 153–167.
42.
WilsonKM (2002) Forecasting the future – How television weathercasters’ attitudes and beliefs about climate change affect their cognitive knowledge on the science.Science Communication24(2): 246–268.
43.
WilsonKM (2009) Opportunities and obstacles for television weathercasters to report on climate change. American Meteorological Society90(10): 1457–1465.
