PUS in turbulent times II – A shifting vocabulary that brokers inter-disciplinary knowledge

Abstract

To reflect further on 20 years of the journal, we present a lexicographic and bibliometric study of all papers published in Public Understanding of Science (PUS). Lexicographical analysis of the vocabulary of 465 abstracts shows five classes of associated concepts in two periods, 1992–2001 and 2002–2010. The concern for public attitudes and mass media coverage remains on the card; while language has shifted from ‘public understanding’ to ‘public engagement’ and environmental concerns have waned then waxed. The bibliometric analysis traces the position of PUS in the inter-citation network of 165 related journals (ISI Web of Science citation database), grouped into 10 disciplines for the purpose of this analysis. Indicators derived from network logic show that the established position of PUS has been stable since 1997. PUS serves a varied brokerage role as gatekeeper into and liaison maker between disciplines. Its inter-citation network position allows PUS to perform inter-disciplinary boundary spanning work that offers a safe space for experimentation with ideas.

Keywords

citation analysis lexicographical analysis ego networks bibliometrics sociology of scientific knowledge scientometrics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bauer

(2005) Distinguishing GREEN from RED biotechnology – cultivation effects of the elite press. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17(1): 63–89.

Bauer

Howard

(2012) Editorial: Public Understanding of Science – a peer-review journal for turbulent times. Public Understanding of Science 21(3): 258–267.

Blau

(1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.

Borgatti

Everett

Freeman

(2002) Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.

Borgman

Furner

(2002) Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. In: Cronin

(ed.) Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol 36. Medford, NJ: Information Today, pp.3–72

Burt

(1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Burt

(2000) The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior 22: 345–423.

Callon

(1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: Law

(ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp.196–233.

Coleman

(1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology 94: 95–120.

10.

Ding

Chowdhury

Foo

(2000) Journal as markers of intellectual space: Journal co-citation analysis of information retrieval area, 1987–1997. Scientometrics 47(1): 55–73.

11.

Everett

Pecotich

(1991) A combined loglinear/MDS model for mapping journals by citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42(6): 405–413.

12.

Gould

Fernandez

(1989) Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology 19: 89–126.

13.

Granovetter

(1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.

14.

Giuffre

(1999) Sand piles of opportunity: Success in the art world. Social Forces 77(3): 815–832.

15.

Heinze

Bauer

(2007) Characterizing creative scientists in nano-S&T: Productivity, multidisciplinarity, and network brokerage in a longitudinal perspective. Scientometrics 70(3): 811–830.

16.

Krackhardt

Stern

(1988) Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly 51: 123–140.

17.

Kuhn

(1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Lahlou

(1996) A method to extract social representations from linguistic corpora. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35(3): 278–391.

19.

Lazarsfeld

Merton

(1954) Friendship as social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In: Berger

Abel

Page

(eds) Freedom and Control in Modern Society. New York: Van Nostrand, pp.18–66.

20.

Lebart

Salem

Barry

(1998) Exploring Textual Data. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

21.

Leydesdorff

(2007) ‘Betweenness centrality’ as an indicator of the ‘interdisciplinarity’ of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(9): 1303–1309.

22.

Leydesdorff

Cozzens

(1993) The delineation of specialties in terms of journals using the dynamic journal set of the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics 26: 133–154.

23.

Lin

(1982) Social resources and instrumental action. In Marsden

Lin

(eds) Social Structure and Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp.131–145.

24.

McPherson

Smith-Lovin

Cook

(2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.

25.

Newman

(2010) Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press

26.

Reinert

(1986) Un logiciel d’analyse lexicale: ALCESTE. Les cahiers de l’analyse des données 4: 471–484.

27.

Seibert

Kraimer

Liden

(2001) A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal 44: 219–237.

28.

Small

(1973) Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24(4)265–269.

29.

Stoneman

Sturgis

P and Allum N

(2012) Exploring public discourses about emerging technologies through statistical clustering of open-ended survey questions. Public Understanding of Science. Epub ahead of print 26 April 2012. DOI: 10.1177/0963662512441569.

30.

Watts

Strogatz

(1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684): 440–442

31.

White

McCain

(1989) Bibliometrics. In: Williams

(ed.) Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 24. New Jersey: Information Today, pp. 119–186.

32.

Ziman

(1968) Public Knowledge. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.23 MB