Another (methodological) look at knowledge gaps and the Internet’s potential for closing them

Abstract

Members of the World Economic Forum recently identified the economic, health and knowledge disparities between the “haves” and “have-nots” in the world as one of the central risks in the global risk landscape. However, research on the role of communication in reducing knowledge disparities for emerging technologies is rare. More importantly, little research has tracked knowledge gaps about emerging technologies in representative populations over time. In this study we examine U.S. public knowledge levels across different levels of education and media use using data from two nationally representative telephone surveys. Our results show that increased science Internet and television use among low education groups can help narrow, or significantly reduce the growth of knowledge gaps that are forming based on educational disparities.

Keywords

media and science nanotechnology public understanding of science science communication science knowledge

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AAPOR (2009) Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Lenexa, KS: American Association for Public Opinion Research.

Anderson

Brossard

Scheufele

(2010) The changing information environment for nanotechnology: Online audiences and content. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 12(4): 1083–1094.

Bauer

Bonfadelli

(2002) Controversy, media coverage and public knowledge. In: Bauer

Gaskell

(eds) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149–175.

Bonfadelli

(2002) The Internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. European Journal of Communication 17(1): 65–84.

Bonfadelli

(2005) Mass media and biotechnology: Knowledge gaps within and between European countries. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17(1): 42–62.

Brossard

Scheufele

Kim

Lewenstein

(2009) Religiosity as a perceptual filter: Examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science 18(5): 546–558.

Cacciatore

Scheufele

Corley

(2011) From enabling technology to applications: The evolution of risk perceptions about nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science 20(3): 385–404.

Cacciatore

Anderson

Choi

D-H

Brossard

Scheufele

Liang

Ladwig

Xenos

Dudo

(forthcoming) Coverage of emerging technologies: A comparison between print and online media. New Media & Society, doi: 10.1177/1461444812439061

Chaffee

Zhao

Leshner

(1994) Political knowledge and the campaign media of 1992. Communication Research 21(3): 305–324.

10.

Cobb

Macoubrie

(2004) Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6(4): 395–405.

11.

Cohen

(1983) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

12.

Donohue

Tichenor

Olien

(1986) Metro daily pullback and knowledge gaps: Within and between communities. Communication Research 13(3): 453–471.

13.

Drew

Weaver

(2006) Voter learning in the 2004 presidential election: Did the media matter? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 83(1): 25–42.

14.

Dudo

Choi

D-H

Scheufele

(2011a) Food nanotechnology in the news: Coverage patterns and thematic emphases during the last decade. Appetite 56(1): 78–89.

15.

Dudo

Dunwoody

Scheufele

(2011b) The emergence of nano news: Tracking thematic trends and changes in U.S. newspaper coverage of nanotechnology. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 88(1): 55–75.

16.

Dyson

(1997) Release 2.0: A Design for Living in the Digital Age. New York, NY: Broadway Books.

17.

Eveland

Scheufele

(2000) Connecting news media use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Political Communication 17(3): 215–237.

18.

Fraile

(2011) Widening or reducing the knowledge gap? Testing the media effects on political knowledge in Spain (2004–2006). International Journal of Press-Politics 16(2): 163–184.

19.

Gates

(1995) The Road Ahead. New York, NY: Viking.

20.

Gates

(2000) Shaping the internet age. Available at: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/billg/writing/shapingtheinternet.mspx (accessed January 1, 2001).

21.

Gates

(2007) Remarks of Bill Gates, Harvard Commencement 2007. Available at: http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2007/06/remarks-of-bill-gates-harvard-commencement-2007/ (accessed June 7, 2007).

22.

Grabe

Kamhawi

Yegiyan

(2009) Informing citizens: How people with different levels of education process television, newspaper, and web news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 53(1): 90–111.

23.

Gregory

Miller

(1998) Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. New York, NY: Plenum.

24.

Holbrook

(2002) Presidential campaigns and the knowledge gap. Political Communication 19(4): 437–454.

25.

Horrigan

(2009) Home broadband adoption 2009. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2009/Home-Broadband-Adoption-2009.pdf (accessed October 2, 2010).

26.

Jerit

Barabas

Bolsen

(2006) Citizens, knowledge, and the information environment. American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 266–282.

27.

Kim

S-H

(2008) Testing the knowledge gap hypothesis in South Korea: Traditional news media, the Internet, and political learning. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20(2): 193–210.

28.

Kleinnijenjuis

(1991) Newspaper complexity and the knowledge gap. European Journal of Communication 6: 499–522.

29.

Kwak

(1999) Revisiting the knowledge gap hypothesis: Education, motivation, and media use. Communication Research 26(4): 385–413.

30.

Ladwig

Dalrymple

Brossard

Scheufele

Xenos

(forthcoming) Perceived familiarity or factual knowledge? Comparing operationalizations of scientific understandings. Science and Public Policy, doi: 10.3152/030234212X13113405157624

31.

Lee

(2009) The role of Internet engagement in the health-knowledge gap. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 53(3): 365–382.

32.

Lee

Scheufele

Lewenstein

(2005) Public attitudes toward emerging technologies: Examining the interactive effects of cognitions and affect on public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Science Communication 27(2): 240–267.

33.

Liu

Y-I

Eveland

(2005) Education, need for cognition, and campaign interest as moderators of news effects on political knowledge: An analysis of the knowledge gap. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 82(4): 910–929.

34.

Macoubrie

(2006) Nanotechnology: Public concerns, reasoning and trust in government. Public Understanding of Science 15(2): 221–241.

35.

McLeod

Perse

(1994) Direct and indirect effects of socioeconomic-status on public affairs knowledge. Journalism Quarterly 71(2): 433–442.

36.

McLeod

Guo

Daily

Steele

Huang

Horowitz

Chen

(1996) The impact of traditional and nontraditional media forms in the 1992 presidential election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 73(2): 401–416.

37.

Miller

(2001) Who is using the Web for science and health information. Science Communication 22(3): 256–273.

38.

Miller

(2004) Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science 13(3): 273–294.

39.

National Academy of Sciences (2010) The Gathering Storm, Revisited: Rapidly Approaching Category 5. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

40.

National Nanotechnology Initiative (2009) Research and Development Leading to a Revolution in Technology and Industry: Supplement to the President’s 2010 Budget. Washington, DC: National Technology Council.

41.

National Science Board (2010) Science and Engineering Indicators, Chapter 7. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov./statistics/seind10/c7/c7h.htm

42.

Neuman

Just

Crigler

(1992) Common Knolwedge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

43.

Peter

. Hart Research Associates (2008) Awareness of and attitudes toward nanotechnology and synthetic biology. Available at: http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/Nanotechnologies/final-synbioreport.pdf (accessed September 7, 2010).

44.

Priest

Bonfadelli

Rusanen

(2003) The “trust gap” hypothesis: Predicting support for biotechnology across national cultures as a function of trust in actors. Risk Analysis 23(4): 751–766.

45.

Prior

(2005) News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science 49(3): 577–592.

46.

Project for Emerging Nanotechnologies (2006) Nanotechnology’s potential threatened by weak public education and outreach. Available at: http://www.nanotechproject.org/news/archive/nanotechnologys_potential_threatened_by/ (accesed December 14, 2010).

47.

Rheingold

(2000) The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

48.

Roberts

Reid

Schroeder

Norris

(forthcoming) Causal or spurious? The relationship of knowledge and attitudes to trust in science and technology. Public Understanding of Science, doi: 10.1177/0963662511420511

49.

Roco

Bainbridge

(2003) Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

50.

Scheufele

Lewenstein

(2005) The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7(6): 659–667.

51.

Scheufele

Corley

Shih

Dalrymple

(2009) Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. Nature Nanotechnology 4(2): 91–94.

52.

Shim

(2008) Connecting internet use with gaps in cancer knowledge. Health Communication 23(5): 448–461.

53.

Sturgis

Allum

(2001) Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: Reply to Hayes and Tariq. Public Understanding of Science 10: 427–430.

54.

Tichenor

Donohue

Olien

(1970) Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly 34(2): 159–170.

55.

Wei

(2008) News media use and knowledge about the 2006 US midterm elections: Why exposure matters in voter learning. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20(3): 347–362.

56.

World Economic Forum (2011) Shared norms for the new reality. Available at: http://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2011 (accessed June 1, 2011).

57.

Zigerell

(2012) Science knowledge and biblical literalism. Public Understanding of Science 21(3): 314–322.