DelgadoA.KjølbergK.L.WicksonF. (2011) “Public Engagement Coming of Age: From Theory to Practice in STS Encounters with Nanotechnology,” Public Understanding of Science20(6): 826–45.
2.
GaskellG.StaresS.AllansdottirA.AllumN.CastroP.EsmerY.FischlerC.JacksonJ.KronbergerN.HampelJ.MejlgaardN.QuintanilhaA.RammerA.RevueltaG.StonemanP.TorgersenH.WagnerW. (2010) “Europeans and Biotechnology in 2010 – Winds of Change?” A report to the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Research. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_341_winds_en.pdf (accessed 10 August 2011).
3.
JasanoffS. (2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
PetersenT. (2011) “Kein Fortschrittspessimismus,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 18May, p. 5.
6.
StirlingA. (2008) “‘Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’: Power, Participation and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology,” Science, Technology and Human Values33(2): 262–94.
7.
WicksonF.DelgadoA.KjølbergK.L. (2010) “Who or What is ‘The Public’?,” Nature Nanotechnology5: 757–8.
8.
ZhangJ.Y.MarrisC.RoseN. (2011) “The Transnational Governance of Synthetic Biology: Scientific Uncertainty, Cross-borderness and the ‘Art’ of Governance,” BIOS Working Paper No. 4, London School of Economics and Political Science. URL: http://royalsociety.org/policy/reports/bios-governance-synthetic-biology (accessed 20 August 2011).