Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article examines the dramadoc genre’s potential to enhance public understanding of science. It focuses on a case study of the UK dramadoc If…Cloning Could Cure Us, which employed a combination of fictionalised drama, documentary interviews and interactive features to explore uses of human cloning in stem cell research. The author conducted 20 focus group screenings of the programme to examine the impact that the dramadoc had on people’s knowledge and opinions. Results show that although critics claim that the genre’s combination of fact and fiction will lead audiences to misunderstandings, the dramadoc also has the potential to increase people’s scientific understandings. New understandings, however, do not necessarily translate into more favourable attitudes towards the topic. The article concludes by arguing that in spite of the programme’s achievements in improving public understanding of science, the dramadoc could have gone further to engage audiences in genuine dialogue about the new technology.

Keywords

cloning drama-documentary interactive media public engagement public understanding of science science communication stem cells television

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BBC (2004) Embryonic stem cell therapy: Have your say. Available at (accessed 30 May 2008): http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/if/4058371.stm

Bodmer

(1985) The Public Understanding of Science. London: Royal Society.

Davin

(2003) Healthy viewing: The reception of medical narratives. Sociology of Health and Illness 25(6): 662–679.

Elkamel

(1995) The use of television series in health education. Health Education Research 10(2): 225–232.

Evans

(2002) Religion and human cloning: An exploratory analysis of the first available opinion data. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41(5): 747–758.

Filipovic

(2004) Reclaiming the term “pro-life” [electronic version]. The Oracle: University of South Florida Daily 17 November. Available at (accessed 5 February 2010): http://media.www.usforacle.com/media/storage/paper880/news/2004/11/17/Opinion/Reclaiming.The.Term.proLife-1674175.shtml

Gregory

Miller

(1998) Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing.

Gregory

Miller

(2001) Caught in the crossfire: The public’s role in the science wars. In: Labinger

Collins

(eds) The One Culture? A Conversation about Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 61–72.

House of Lords (2000) Science and Society: Third Report. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

10.

Irwin

(2006) The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the “new” scientific governance. Social Studies of Science 36(2): 299–320.

11.

Irwin

Wynne

(eds) (1996) Misunderstanding Science: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. London: Routledge.

12.

Jhally

Lewis

(1992) Enlightened Racism: The Cosby Show, Audiences, and the Myth of the American Dream. Boulder: Westview Press.

13.

Kitzinger

(2004) Framing Abuse: Media Influence and Understanding of Sexual Violence against Children. London: Pluto Press.

14.

Kitzinger

Barbour

(1999) Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. In: Barbour

Kitzinger

(eds) Developing Focus Group Research. London: SAGE Publications, 1–20.

15.

Morgan

(Producer) and Sutton

(Writer) (2004) If…Cloning Could Cure Us [television series episode]. In: Woolwich

(Executive Producer) IF. London: BBC.

16.

Nisbet

(2004) The polls: Public opinion about stem cell research and human cloning. Public Opinion Quarterly 68(1): 132–155.

17.

Paget

(1998) No Other Way to Tell It: Dramadoc/Docudrama on Television. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

18.

Rhind

Taylor

De Sousa

King

McGarry

Wilmut

(2003) Human cloning: Can it be made safe? Nature Reviews Genetics 4(11): 855–864.

19.

Sturgis

Allum

(2004) Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science 13: 55–74.

20.

Williams

Kitzinger

Henderson

(2003) Envisioning the embryo in stem cell research: Rhetorical strategies and media reporting of the ethical debates. Sociology of Health and Illness 25(7): 793–814.

21.

Wilsdon

Willis

(2004) See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: DEMOS.

22.

Wynne

(1992) Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science 1(3): 281–304.

23.

Yearley

(2000) What does science mean in the “public understanding of science”? In: Dierkes

Von Grote

(eds) Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 217–236.

The television drama-documentary (dramadoc) as a form of science communication

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References