Many foods and eating practices have been framed as risky by risk societies. Recently, high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) has become a highly scrutinized food additive. Informed by a social construction of risk framework, I analyze the discursive contributions of the Corn Refiners Association, a trade association, to public negotiations of HFCS risks. I describe how the association’s Sweet Surprise campaign advertisements rely on a deficit model to shape understandings of who should participate in conversations about HFCS. I conclude by exploring the practical implications of this analysis, particularly how trade associations can negotiate tensions between promoting health and serving commercial interests, and how these decisions contribute to understandings of the public’s role in risk negotiation.
AugoustinosMCrabbSShepherdR (2010) Genetically modified food in the news: Media representations of the GM debate in the UK. Public Understanding of Science19(1): 98–114.
2.
BaumgartnerFRLeechBL (2001) Issue niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest group involvement in national politics. Journal of Politics63(4): 1191–1213.
3.
BeckU (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE.
4.
BeckU (1999) What is Globalization?Cambridge: Polity Press.
5.
BitzerLF (1968) The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric1: 1–14.
BrayGANielsenSJPopkinBM (2004) Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition79: 537–543.
11.
BrowneSH (2009) Close textual analysis: Approaches and applications. In: KuypersJA (ed.) Rhetorical Criticism. New York: Lexington, 63–77.
12.
BurkeK (1969) Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
13.
CeccarelliL (2001) Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The Case of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
CoveneyJ (2001) Food, Morals, and Meanings. New York: Routledge.
15.
DoegC (2005) Crisis Management in the Food and Drinks Industry. New York: Springer.
16.
EisenbergEM (1984) Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs51: 227–242.
17.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
18.
GierynTF (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
GrossAG (1994) The roles of rhetoric in the public understandings of science. Public Understanding of Science3: 3–23.
20.
GrunertKG (2005) Food quality and safety: Consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agricultural Economics32(2): 369–391.
21.
HeathRL (2009) The rhetorical tradition: Wrangle in the market place. In: HeathRLTothELWaymerD (eds) Rhetorical and Critical Approaches to Public Relations II. New York: Routledge, 17–47.
IrwinA (2001) Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science10(1): 1–18.
24.
JasanoffS (1997) Civilization and madness: The great BSE scare of 1996. Public Understanding of Science6(1): 221–232.
25.
JonesR (2002) Challenges to the notion of publics in public relations: Implications of risk society for the discipline. Public Relations Review28: 49–62.
26.
LordR (1997) US sugar consumption continues to grow. Agricultural Outlook March: 13–16. Washington DC: USDA Economic Research Service.
27.
LudwigDSNestleM (2008) Can the food industry play a constructive role in the obesity epidemic? Journal of the American Medical Association300(15): 1808–1811.
28.
LuptonDA (1996) Food, the Body and the Self. London: SAGE.
29.
LuptonDA (1999) Risk. New York: Routledge.
30.
LyneJHoweHF (1990) The rhetoric of expertise: E. O. Wilson and sociobiology. Quarterly Journal of Speech76: 134–151.
31.
McComasKA (2006) Defining moments in risk communication research: 1996–2005. Journal of Health Communication11: 75–91.
32.
McKeeKBLambLF (2009) Applied Public Relations: Case Studies in Stakeholder Management. New York: Routledge.
33.
MaurerDSobalJ (1995) Eating Agendas: Food and Nutrition as Social Problems. Hawthorne, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
34.
MeasellJS (1992) Trade associations: Whose voice? Whose vice? In: TothELHeathRL (eds) Rhetorical and Critical Approaches to Public Relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 225–240.
35.
“Member companies” (n.d.) Corn Refiners Association website. URL (accessed 10 March 2010): corn.com
36.
MichaelsD (2008) Doubt is their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens your Health. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
MichaelsDMonfortonC (2005) Manufacturing uncertainty: Contested science and the protection of the public’s health and environment. American Journal of Public Health95(S1): S39–S48.
38.
MichaelsDMonfortonCLurieP (2006) Selected science: An industry campaign to undermine an OSHA hexavalent chromium standard. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source5(5), URL: http://www.ehjournal.net/content/5/1/5
39.
MillerCR (2005) Risk, controversy, and rhetoric: Response to Goodnight. Argumentation and Advocacy42: 34–37.
40.
MumbyDK (2001) Power and politics. In: JablinFMPutnamLL (eds) The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 585–623.
41.
NestleM (2003) Food Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
42.
OreskesNConwayEM (2010) Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury.
PollanM (2008) In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto. New York: Penguin.
45.
PollanM (2006) Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. New York: Penguin.
46.
PotterJ (1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
47.
RiekeRDSillarsMDPetersonTR (2009) Argumentation and Critical Decision Making. Boston, MA: Pearson.
48.
RundbladGChiltonPAHunterPR (2006) An enquiry into scientific and media discourse in the MMR controversy: Authority and factuality. Communication and Medicine3(1): 69–80.
49.
ShawA (2002) “It just goes against the grain”: Public understandings of genetically-modified (GM) foods in the UK. Public Understanding of Science11(3): 273–291.
50.
SimonM (2006) Appetite for Profit. New York: Nation Books.
51.
SinghVJohnstonD (2004) An enzymatic process for corn wet milling. In: TaylorS (ed.) Advances in Food and Nutrition Research. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press, 151–168.
ThompsonSRGarciaPWildmanLD (1996) The demise of the high fructose corn syrup futures contract: A case study. Journal of Futures Markets16(6): 697–724.
54.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2009) Table 50: U.S. per capita caloric sweeteners estimated deliveries for domestic food and beverage use, by calendar year [Data file], 10 December. URL: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Sugar/Data.htm
VerbekeW (2005) Agriculture and the food industry in the information age. European Review of Agricultural Economics32(3): 347–368.
57.
WansinkBPetersJC (2007) The food industry role in obesity prevention. In: KumanyikaSBrownsonRC (eds) Handbook of Obesity Prevention: A Resource for Health Professionals. New York: Springer, 193–208.
