Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2012-5
Environmental conflicts,research projects and the generation of collective expectations: A case study of a land regeneration project in Tuzla,Bosnia and Herzegovina
Locally based research projects may generate multiple and competing expectations from local actors, particularly when they deal with local issues that are perceived as affecting the local quality of life, such as land regeneration. The sociology of expectations provides an entry point through which the expectations of research projects in the context of an environmental conflict can be investigated. This article analyzes a case study of a project (RECOAL) whose remit was to develop regeneration solutions for coal ash disposal sites in the western Balkans. The sociology of expectations is applied here to explain the linkage between the emergence of political discourses and collective expectations. The analysis suggests that the emergence of collective future orientations of locally based research projects needs to be understood with reference to the specific political positions from which such orientations are expressed. While expectations may shape the political debate, the political debate is also generative of such expectations.
BeardsworthAD (1990) Trans-science and moral panics: Understanding food scares. British Food Journal92(5): 11–16.
2.
BlumerH (1998[1969]). The methodological position of Symbolic Interactionism. In: BlumerH, Symbolic Interactionism. Berkeley, LA, London: University of California Press: 1–60.
3.
BrownNMichaelM (2003) A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management15: 3–18.
4.
BrownNRappertBWebsterA (2000a) Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-science. Aldershot: Ashgate.
5.
BrownNRappertBWebsterA (2000b). Introducing contested futures: From looking into the future to looking at the future. In: BrownNRappertBWebsterA (eds) Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-science. Aldershot: Ashgate, 3–20.
6.
BurgessJClarkJHarrisonCM (2000) Knowledges in action: an actor network analysis of a wetland agri-environment scheme. Ecological Economics35(1): 119–132.
7.
Castán BrotoVCarterCElghaliL (2009) The governance of coal ash pollution in post-socialist times: Power and expectations. Environmental Politics18(2): 279–86.
8.
ChessCPurcellK (1999). Public participation and the environment: Do we know what works?Environmental Science and Technology33(16): 2685–92.
9.
ClarkT (2008) “We’re over-researched here!”: Exploring accounts of research fatigue within qualitative research engagements. Sociology42(5): 953–70.
10.
DellantonioAFitzWJCustovicHRepmannFSchneiderBUGrünewaldHGruberVZgorelecZZeremNCarterCMarkovicMPuschenreiterMWenzelWW (2008) Environmental risks of farmed and barren alkaline coal ash landfills in Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Environmental Pollution153(3): 677–86.
FairheadJLeachM (1996) Misreading the African Landscape – Society and Ecology in a Forest-Savanna Mosaic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
ForsythT (2003) Critical Political Ecology: the Politics of Environmental Science. London: Routledge.
14.
GamboaGMundaG (2007) The problem of windfarm location: A social multi-criteria evaluation framework. Energy Policy35(3): 1564–83.
15.
GeelsFWSmitWA (2000) Failed technology futures: Pitfalls and lessons from a historical survey. Futures32(9–10): 867–85.
16.
HarrisonCMBurgess and ClarkJ (1998) Discounted knowledges: Farmers’ and residents’ understandings of nature conservation goals and policies. Journal of Environmental Management54(4): 305–20.
17.
HedgecoeAMartinP (2003) The drugs don’t work: Expectations and the shaping of pharmacogenetics. Social Studies of Science33(3): 327–64.
18.
HorstM (2007) Public expectations of gene therapy: Scientific futures and their performative effects on scientific citizenship. Science Technology Human Values32(2): 150–71.
19.
HyysaloS (2006) Representations of use and practice-bound imaginaries in automating the safety of the elderly. Social Studies of Science36(4): 599–626.
20.
IrwinAMichaelM (2003) Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Maidenhead: Open University Press–McGraw Hill Education.
21.
JanowitzM (1966) Introduction. In: Thomas WIOn Social Organisation and Social Personality. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press: vii–lviii.
22.
KallisGVideiraNAntunesPPereiraGSpashCLCoccossisHQuintanaSCdel MoralLHatzilacouDLoboGMexaAPanequePMateosBPSantosR (2006) Participatory methods for water resources planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24(2): 215–34.
23.
KonradK (2006a) Shifting but forceful expectations: Structuring through the prospect of materialisation. Paper presented at the Twente VII workshop ‘Material Narratives – of Technology in Society’, 19–21 October, Enschede, The Netherlands.
24.
KonradK (2006b) The social dynamics of expectations: The interaction of collective and actor-specific expectations on electronic commerce and interactive television. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management18: 429–44.
25.
MichaelM (2000). Futures of the present: From performativity to prehension. In: BrownNRappertBWebsterA (eds) Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-science. Aldershot Ashgate, 21–42.
26.
MossT (2003) Utilities, land-use change, and urban development: Brownfield sites as “cold-spots” of infrastructure networks in Berlin. Environment and Planning A35(3): 511–29.
27.
OwensSECowellR (2002) Land and Limits: Interpreting Sustainability in the Planning Process. London: Routledge.
28.
PetersonG (2000) Political ecology and ecological resilience: An integration of human and ecological dynamics. Ecological Economics35(3): 323–36.
29.
RauschmayerFvan den HoveSKoetzT (2009) Participation in EU biodiversity governance: how far beyond rhetoric?’Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27(1): 42–58.
30.
RavenRPJMHeiskanenELovioRHodsonM (2007) Local negotiation and alignment of expectations and transfer of lessons in niche development trajectories: Meta-analysis of 22 new energy projects in Europe. Paper presented at the Workshop on Innovation, Institutions and Path Dependency, 15–18 April, Zürich, Switzerland.
31.
RebetezM (1996) Public expectation as an element of human perception of climate change. Climatic Change32(4): 495–509.
32.
RosengartenMMichaelM (2009) The performative function of expectations in translating treatment to prevention: The case of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP. Social Science & Medicine69(7): 1049–55.
33.
ScolobigACastán BrotoVZabalaA (2008) Integrating multiple perspectives in social multicriteria evaluation of flood-mitigation alternatives: The case of Malborghetto-Valbruna. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26(6): 1143–61.
34.
SelinC (2007) Expectations and the emergence of nanotechnology. Science Technology Human Values32(2): 196–220.
35.
ThomasWI (1923) The unadjusted girl: With cases and standpoint from behaviour analysis. Criminal Science Monographs4: 1–257.
36.
WynneBMayerS (1993) How science fails the environment. New Scientist138: 33–5.
