This article examines justice in the context of a controversial industrial waste facility siting in a Hakka (a minority ethnic group) town in Taiwan. It provides analysis of local perceptions of disproportionate risk, community knowledge claims, and the challenges of citizens to the controversial environmental impact assessment process. It explores knowledge disputes among regulators, developers, and local activists; it considers the struggle of local actors for recognition and inclusion in decision-making; and it argues for the development of institutional procedures that promote dialogue among stakeholders in order to avoid the preemption of debate, the control of the frame by the government and experts, and the centralization of power.
AgyemanJEvansB (2004) “Just sustainability”: The emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain?Geographical Journal170(2): 155–164.
2.
AgyemanJEvansB (2006) Justice, governance, and sustainability: Perspectives on environmental citizenship from North America and Europe. In: DobsonADellB (eds) Environmental Citizenship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 185–206.
3.
ArcioniEMitchellG (2005) Environmental justice in Australia: When the RATS become IRATE. Environmental Politics14(3): 363–379.
4.
CapekS (1993) The “environmental justice” frame: A conceptual discussion and an application. Social Problems40(1): 5–24.
5.
ChenDS (2005) The limitations of deliberative democracy: Cases of citizen conference in Taiwan. Paper presented at the International Conference on Deliberative Democracy, Taiwan ThinkTank, Taipei, Taiwan, 29–30 August.
6.
ChiCC (2001) Capitalist expansion and indigenous land rights: Emerging environmental justice issues in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology2(2): 135–153.
7.
China Times (2004) The controversy of incinerator ash facility siting. 22September (in Chinese).
8.
CorburnJ (2005) Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Di ChiroG (1995) Nature as community: The convergence of environment and social justice. In: CrononW (ed.) Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature. New York: W.W. Norton, 298–320.
10.
Environmental Protection Administration (2005) The Plan of Encouraging Local Governments and the Private Sector to Cooperate in Industrial Waste Disposal. Taipei: EPA. (In Chinese)
11.
FanMF (2006) Environmental justice and nuclear waste conflicts in Taiwan. Environmental Politics15(3): 417–434.
12.
FiorinoDJ (1990) Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values15(2): 226–243.
13.
GatesHWellerR (1987) Hegemony and Chinese folk ideologies: An introduction. Modern China13(1): 3–16.
14.
GrundmannR (2007) Climate change and knowledge politics. Environmental Politics16(3): 414–432.
15.
HajerMA (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernisation and Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
Horlick-JonesTWallsJRoweGMurdockGO’RiordanTPidgeonNPoortingaW (2007) The GM Debate: Risk, Politics and Public Engagement. London: Routledge.
17.
HunoldCYoungI (1998) Justice, democracy and hazardous siting. Political Studies46: 82–95.
18.
IrwinA (1995) Citizen Science. London: Routledge.
19.
IrwinA (2001) Sociology and the Environment: A Critical Introduction to Society, Nature and Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity.
20.
IshiyamaN (2003) Environmental justice and American Indian tribal sovereignty: Case study of a land-use conflict in Skull Valley, Utah. Antipode35(1): 119–139.
21.
LeachMScoonesI (2005) Science and citizenship in a global context. In: LeachMScoonesIWynneB (eds) Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement. London: Zed Books, 15–38.
22.
MiddletonJ (2003) Health, environmental and social justice. Local Environment8(2): 155–165.
23.
OckwellDRydinY (2006) Conflicting discourses of knowledge: Understanding the policy adoption of pro-burning knowledge claims in Cape York Peninsula, Australia. Environmental Politics15(3): 379–398.
24.
ParkinsonJ (2003) Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy. Political Studies51: 180–196.
25.
PeñaD (2003) Identity, place and communities of resistance. In: AgyemanJBullardREvansB (eds) Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal World. London: Earthscan, 146–167.
26.
SandersL (1997) Against deliberation. Political Theory25(3): 347–376.
27.
SchlosbergD (1999) Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism: The Challenge of Difference for Environmentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
SchlosbergD (2003) The justice of environmental justice: Reconciling equity, recognition, and participation in a political movement. In: LightAde-ShalitA (eds) Moral and Political Reasoning in Environmental Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 77–106.
29.
SchlosbergD (2004) Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics13(3): 517–540.
30.
SlovicP (1999) Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. In: CvetkovichGLöfstedtR (eds) Social Trust and the Management of Risk. London: Earthscan, 42–52.
31.
Taipei Times (2004) More controversy over incinerators. 6May, p. 4.
32.
TaylorD (2000) The rise of the environmental justice paradigm: Injustice framing and the social construction of environmental discourses. American Behavioral Scientist43(4): 508–580.
33.
Van der PloegJD (1993) Potatoes and knowledge. In: HobartM (ed.) An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance. London: Routledge, 209–227.
34.
VisvanathanS (2005) Knowledge, justice and democracy. In: LeachMScoonesIWynneB (eds) Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement. London: Zed Books, 83–94.
35.
WangJPLiawSC (2006) Analysis of environmental justice and media’s sense of place in the “Our Island” program of the public television service: A case study of the film “Is this Place Safe?”Journal of Geographical Research44: 1–21 (in Chinese).
36.
WynneB (1996) Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and public uptake of science. In: IrwinAWynneB (eds) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19–46.
37.
YearleyS (1995) The environmental challenge to science studies. In: JasanoffSMarkleGPetersenJPinchT (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. London: Sage, 457–479.
38.
YearleyS (2003) Participatory modelling and the local governance of the politics of UK air pollution: A three-city case study. Environmental Values12: 247–262.
39.
YearleyS (2006) Bridging the science–policy divide in urban air-quality management: Evaluating ways to make models more robust through public engagement. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24: 701–714.
40.
YoungI (1983) Justice and hazardous waste. In: BradieMAttigTRescherN (eds) The Applied Turn in Contemporary Philosophy. Bowling Green Studies in Applied Philosophy, vol. 5. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Applied Philosophy Program.
41.
YoungI (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
