In this paper, we analyse the data on citizen participation obtained by a recent Ibero-American survey on social perception of science and scientific culture conducted in seven important Ibero-American cities during autumn and winter 2007. The purpose is to analyse the relationship between scientific culture and its behavioural dimensions, especially the willingness to engage in participatory activities. In this respect, we assume that the inclination towards citizen participation generated by processes of scientific education captures relevant political dimensions of scientific culture. The paper combines a quantitative methodology for exploiting demographic data with a qualitative approach to the phenomenon of participation.
BauerM.W. (2009) “The Evolution of Public Understanding of Science – Discourse and Comparative Evidence,” Science, Technology and Society14(2): 221–40.
2.
BauerM.W.AllumN.MillerS. (2007) “What Can We Learn from 25 Years of PUS Survey Research? Liberating and Expanding the Agenda,” Public Understanding of Science16: 79–95.
3.
BurnsT.W.O’ConnorD.J.StocklmayerS.M. (2003) “Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition,” Public Understanding of Science12(2): 183–202.
4.
CorburnJ. (2005) Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
DurantD. (2008) “Accounting for Expertise: Wynne and the Autonomy of the Lay Public Actor,” Public Understanding of Science17(1): 5–20.
FECYT (Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología) (2005) Percepción social de la ciencia y la tecnología en España 2004. Madrid: FECYT.
8.
FECYT (Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología) (2007) Percepción social de la ciencia y la tecnología en España 2006. Madrid: FECYT.
9.
FECYT, OEI and RICYT (2009) Cultura científica en Iberoamérica. Encuesta en grandes núcleos urbanos. Madrid: FECYT, OEI and RICYT.
10.
FischerF. (2000) Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
11.
JossS.DurantJ., eds (1995) Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: Science Museum/European Commission Directorate General XII.
12.
López CerezoJ.A.Cámara HurtadoM. (2007) “Scientific Culture and Social Appropriation of the Science,” Social Epistemology21(1): 55–67.
13.
MillerJ. (2004) “Public Understanding of, and Attitudes toward, Scientific Research: What We Know and What We Need to Know,” Public Understanding of Science13: 273–94.
14.
MillerJ.PardoR.NiwaF. (1997) Public Perceptions of Science and Technology: A Comparative Study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Madrid and Chicago: Fundación BBV/Chicago Academy of Sciences.
15.
PardoR.CalvoF. (2002) “Attitudes toward Science among the European Public: A Methodological Analysis,” Public Understanding of Science11: 155–95.
16.
PardoR.CalvoF. (2007) “Mapping Perceptions of Science in End-of-Century Europe,” Science Communication28(1): 3–46.
17.
PetersenJ.C., ed. (1984) Citizen Participation in Science Policy. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
18.
RennO.WeblerT.WiedemannP., eds (1995) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19.
RipA.MisaT.SchotJ., eds (1995) Managing Technology in Society. London: Pinter.
20.
RothW.M.LeeS. (2002) “Scientific Literacy as Collective Praxis,” Public Understanding of Science11: 33–56.
21.
RoweG.FrewerL. (2005) “A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms,” Science, Technology, and Human Values30(2): 251–90.
22.
SturgisP.AllumN. (2004) “Science in Society: Re-evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes,” Public Understanding of Science13: 55–74.
23.
TytlerR.DugganS.GottR. (2001) “Public Participation in an Environmental Dispute: Implications for Science Education,” Public Understanding of Science10: 343–64.
24.
WeblerT.TulerS. (2002) “Unlocking the Puzzle of Public Participation,” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society22(3): 179–89.
25.
WynneB. (1992) “Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science,” Public Understanding of Science1: 281–304.
26.
WynneB. (2008) “Elephants in the Rooms Where Public Encounter ‘Science’? A Response to Darrin Durant, ‘Accounting for Expertise: Wynne and the Autonomy of the Lay Public,’” Public Understanding of Science17(1): 21–33.
