Aarnio K.,Lindeman M..Paranormal Beliefs, Education and Thinking Styles.Personality and Individual Differences. 2005;39:1227-36
2.
Allum N.,Sturgis P.,Tabourazi D.,Brunton-Smith I..Science Knowledge and Attitudes across Cultures: A Meta-Analysis.Public Understanding of Science. 2008;17:35-54
3.
Bauer M.Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. Bucchi M.Trench B., ed. London and New York: Routledge; 2008:111-30.
4.
Uskonto, arvot ja instituutiot. Suomalaiset World Values – tutkimuksissa 1981–2005. Borg S.Ketola K.Kääriäinen K.Niemelä K.Suhonen P., ed. Tampere: Tampere University Press; 2007:
5.
Bruce S..The Supply-Side Model of Religion: The Nordic and Baltic States.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2000;1:32-46
6.
Bucchi M..When Scientists Turn to the Public: Alternative Routes in Science Communication.Public Understanding of Science. 1996;5:375-94
7.
Bucchi M.Science and the Media: Alternative Routes in Scientific Communication. London: Routledge; 1998:
8.
Carragee K. M.,Roefs W..The Neglect of Power in Recent Framing Research Journal of Communication.. 2004;54 (2): 214-33
9.
Carvalho A..Ideological Cultures and Media Discourses on Scientific Knowledge: Re-Reading News on Climate Change.Public Understanding of Science. 2007;16 (2): 223-43
10.
Cassidy A..Popular Evolutionary Psychology in the UK: An Unusual Case of Science in the Media?.Public Understanding of Science. 2005;14:115-41
11.
Cassidy A..Evolutionary Psychology as Public Science and Boundary Work.Public Understanding of Science. 2006;15:175-205
12.
Dunwoody S.,Griffin R.The Mass Media and Environmental Issues. Hansen A., ed. Leicester: Leicester University Press; 1993:22-50.
13.
Durant J.,Evans G.,Thomas G..Public Understanding of Science in Britain: The Role of Medicine in the Popular Representation of Science.Public Understanding of Science. 1992;1 (2): 161-82
14.
Entman R..Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.Journal of Communication. 1993;43 (4): 51-8
15.
Eurobarometer 63.1 (2005) “Science and Technology, Social Values, and Services of General Interest, January–February 2005.” URL (accessed 26 March 2009): http://www.fsd.uta.fi/english/data/catalogue/FSD2216/meF2216e.html
16.
Finnish Science Barometer (2001) Helsinki: Finnish Society for Scientific Information (not available online).
17.
Finnish Science Barometer (2004) Helsinki: Finnish Society for Scientific Information. URL (accessed 10 September 2009): http://www.sci.fi/~yhdys/tb2/Finnish%20Science%20Barometer%202004.pdf
18.
Finnish Science Barometer (2007) Helsinki: Finnish Society for Scientific Information. URL (accessed 10 September 2009): http://www.sci.fi/~yhdys/tb3/english3.htm
19.
Gamson W.,Lasch K.Evaluating the Welfare State: Social and Political Perspectives. Spiro S. E.Yuchtman-Yaar E., ed. New York: Academic Press; 1983:397-415.
20.
Gitlin T.The Whole World Is Watching. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1980:
21.
Gross P.,Levitt N.Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press; 1994:
22.
Hacking I.The Social Construction of What?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1999:
23.
Irwin A.,Wynne B.Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996:
24.
Ketola K.,Kääriäinen K.,Niemelä K.Uskonto, arvot ja instituutiot. Suomalaiset World Values – tutkimuksissa 1981–2005. Borg S.Ketola K.Kääriäinen K.Niemelä K.Suhonen P., ed. Tampere: Tampere University Press; 2007:
25.
Kuhn T.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; [1962] 1970:
26.
Michael M..Between Citizen and Consumer: Multiplying the Meanings of ‘Public Understanding of Science,’.Public Understanding of Science. 1998;7:313-28
27.
Miettinen R.,Väliverronen E.Biotechnology and Public Understanding of Science. Miettinen R., ed. Helsinki: Academy of Finland; 1999:11-22.
28.
Miller J. D.The Public Understanding of Science and Technology in the US: Report to the US National Science Foundation. DeKalb, IL: National Opinion Research Centre, University of Chicago; 1991:
29.
Miller J. D.,Scott E.C.,Okamoto S..Public Acceptance of Evolution.Science. 2006;313 (5788): 765-6
30.
PISA (2006) “Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World,” URL (accessed 10 March 2009): http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/63/35/37464175.pdf
31.
RuseM. (2007) “Creationism,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL (accessed 5 November 2007): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/creationism/
32.
Segerstråle U.The Defenders of the Truth: The Sociobiology Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:
33.
Sokal A..Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity.Social Text. 1996;46–47:217-52
34.
Sokal A.,Bricmont J.Fashionable Nonsense. New York: Picador; 1998:
35.
Väliverronen E..Biodiversity and the Power of Metaphor in Environmental Discourse.Science Studies. 1998;11 (1): 19-34
36.
Väliverronen E..Stories of the ‘Medicine Cow’: Representations of Future Promises in Media Discourse.Public Understanding of Science. 2004;13:363-77
37.
Wynne B..Public Understanding of Science: New Horizons or Hall of Mirrors?.Public Understanding of Science. 1992;1:37-43
38.
Wynne B.Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Jasanoff S.Markle G. E.Pedersen J.Pinch T., ed. London: SAGE; 1995:361-88.
