This paper argues that it is time for public understanding of science to develop a critical inventory of the forms, formats and methods of public participation and their respective implications and ambiguities. It highlights the need for analysing not only the limitations and deficiencies of participatory arrangements but also their constructive dimension, in particular the construction of the subject of participation. Looking into participatory governance arrangements in the issue area of genetic testing in Germany and the UK the paper presents a typology of formats according to the way the respective public is constructed and identifies four major constructions of publics: the general public, the pure public, the affected public and the partisan public. Each of these enables certain speaking positions while foreclosing others. The study shows that the main purposes of participatory arrangements in this issue area are knowledge production and education rather than political deliberation and decision-making.
Abels, G. ( 2007) "Citizen Involvement in Public Policy-making: Does it Improve Democratic Legitimacy and Accountability? The Case of pTA," Interdisciplinary Information Science13(1): 103-16.
2.
Abels, G. and Bora, A. ( 2004) Demokratische Technikbewertung. Bielefeld : transcript.
3.
Bauer, M.W., Allum, N. and Miller, S. ( 2007) "What Can We Learn from 25 Years of PUS Survey Research? Liberating and Expanding the Agenda," Public Understanding of Science16(1): 79-95.
4.
Braun, K. ( 2005) "Not just for Experts: The Public Debate on Reprogenetics in Germany," Hastings Center Report35(3): 42-9.
5.
Braun, K. and Schultz, S. (forthcoming) "Governing Genetic Choices: Participatory Exercises, the Construction of Publics and the Quest for Authenticity," in H. Gottweis , M. Hajer and A. Loeber (eds) Life Matters: New Practices of Participatory Governance in Europe.
6.
Braun, K., Moore, A., Herrmann, S. and Koenninger, S. ( 2008) "Die Sprache der Ethik und die Politik des richtigen Sprechens. Regulative Ethikregime in Deutschland, Frankreich und Großbritannien ," in R. Mayntz, F. Neidhardt, P. Weingart and U. Wengenroth (eds) Wissensproduktion und Wissenstransfer. Wissen im Spannungsfeld von Wissenschaft, Politik und Öffentlichkeit , pp. 221-42. Bielefeld: transcript.
7.
Burchell, K., Franklin, S. and Holden, K. ( 2009) Public Culture as Professional Science: Final Report of the ScoPE Project (Scientists on Public Engagement: From Communication to Deliberation?). London: BIOS . URL (consulted August 2009): http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/BIOS/scope/scope.htm
8.
Bütschi, D. and Nentwich, M. ( 2002) "The Role of Participatory Technology Assessment in the Policy-making Process," in S. Joss and S. Bellucci (eds) Participatory Technology Assessment: European Perspectives, pp. 235-56. London : University of Westminster Press.
9.
Chilvers, J. ( 2008) "Deliberating Competence," Science, Technology, and Human Values33(2): 155-85.
10.
Collins, H.M. and Evans, R. ( 2002) "The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience," Social Studies of Science32(2): 235-96.
Dewey, J. ( 1991) The Public and its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry . Athens, OH: Swallow Press / Ohio University Press.
13.
Dryzek, J. ( 2002) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
Einsiedel, E. and Kamara, M.W. ( 2006) "The Coming of Age of Public Participation," in G. Gaskell and M. W. Bauer (eds) Genomics and Society: Legal, Ethical and Social Dimensions, pp. 95-112. London: Earthscan .
15.
Felt, U. and Fochler, M. ( 2008) "The Bottom-up Meanings of the Concept of Public Participation in Science and Technology," Science and Public Policy35(7): 489-99.
16.
Felt, U. and Wynne, B. ( 2007) Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Brussels: European Commission. URL (consulted February 2009): http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/european-knowledge-society_en.pdf
17.
Fischer, F. ( 2000) Citizens, Experts, and the Environment. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
18.
Fischer, F. ( 2005) "Are Scientists Irrational? Risk Assessment in Practical Reason," in M. Leach, I. Scoones and B. Wynne (eds) Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, pp. 54-65. London: Zed Books .
19.
Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung (2002) Begleitende Evaluation der Bürgerkonferenz Streitfall Gendiagnostik. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer-Institut für Systemtechnik und Innovationsforschung (ISI).
20.
Frewer, L.J. and Salter, B. ( 2007) "Societal Trust in Risk Analysis: Implications for the Interface of Risk Assessment and Risk Management," in M. Siegrist, T. C. Earle and H. Gutscher (eds) Risk Management and Public Trust, pp. 143-58. London: Earthscan .
21.
Gottweis, H. and Braun, K. ( 2007) Participatory Governance and Institutional Innovation [PAGANINI], Contract No. CIT2-CT-2004-505791. Deliverable No. 18. Final report . URL (consulted August 2009): http://www.univie.ac.at/life-science-governance/paganini/output.htm
22.
Gottweis, H., Braun, K., Haila, Y., Hajer, M., Loeber, A., Metzler, I., Reynolds, L., Schultz, S. and Szerszynski, B. ( 2008) "Participation and the New Governance of Life," BioSocieties3(3): 265-86.
23.
Gottweis, H., Hajer, M. and Loeber, A. (eds) (forthcoming) Life Matters: New Practices of Participatory Governance in Europe .
24.
Goven, J. ( 2006) "Dialogue, Governance and Biotechnology: Acknowledging the Context of the Conversation," Integrated Assessment Journal6(3): 99-116.
25.
Hennen, L. ( 2002) "Impacts of Participatory Technology Assessment on its Societal Environment," in S. Joss and S. Bellucci (eds) Participatory Technology Assessment: European Perspectives, pp. 257-75. London : University of Westminster Press.
26.
Herrmann, S.L. ( 2009) Policy Debates on Reprogenetics: The Problematization of New Research in Great Britain and Germany. Frankfurt a.M. and New York: Campus.
27.
Hfea (2007) "Should We Allow the Creation of Human/Animal Embryos?," Press release, 26 April, URL (consulted October 2008): http://www.hfea.gov.uk/en/1518.html
28.
HFEA and HGC (2001) Outcome of the Public Consultation on Preimplantation Diagnosis. URL (consulted February 2008): http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/PGD_outcome.pdf
29.
HGC (2000) Whose Hands on Your Genes? A Discussion Document on the Storage, Protection and Use of Personal Genetic Information. URL (consulted February 2009): http://www.hgc.gov.uk/UploadDocs/DocPub/Document/business_consultations2maintext.pdf
30.
HGC (2001) Public Attitudes to Human Genetic Information: People’s Panel Quantitative Study Conducted for the Human Genetics Commission. March, URL (consulted February 2009): http://www.hgc.gov.uk/UploadDocs/DocPub/Document/morigeneticattitudes.pdf
31.
HGC (2006) Making Babies: Reproductive Decisions and Genetic Technologies. URL (consulted February 2009): http://www.hgc.gov.uk/Client/document.asp?DocId=112&CAtegoryId=8
32.
HGC (2008) "What is the Consultative Panel?," URL (consulted February 2009): http://www.hgc.gov.uk/Client/Content.asp?ContentId=375
33.
Irwin, A. ( 2001) "Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences," Public Understanding of Science10(1): 1-18.
34.
Irwin, A. ( 2006) "The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the ‘New’ Scientific Governance," Social Studies of Science63(2): 299-320.
35.
Irwin, A. and Michael, M. ( 2003) Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
36.
Irwin, A. and Wynne, B. ( 1996) Misunderstanding Science?Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
37.
Jasanoff, S. ( 2003) "Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science," Minerva41(3): 223-44.
38.
Lengwiler, M. ( 2008) "Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology: Historical Origins and Current Practices in Critical Perspective," Science, Technology, and Human Values33(2): 186-200.
39.
Levidow, L. ( 1998) "Democratizing Technology - or Technologizing Democracy? Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology in Europe," Technology in Society20(2): 211-26.
40.
Levidow, L. ( 2007) "European Public Participation as Risk Governance: Enhancing Democratic Accountability for Agbiotech Policy?," East Asian Science, Technology and Society: an International Journal (EASTS)1(1): 19-51.
41.
Levidow, L. and Carr, S. ( 1997) "How Biotechnology Regulation Sets a Risk/Ethics Boundary ," Agriculture and Human Values14(6): 29-43.
42.
Levidow, L. and Marris, C. ( 2001) "Science and Governance in Europe: Lessons from the Case of Agricultural Biotechnology," Science and Public Policy28(5): 345-60.
43.
Lezaun, J. and Soneryd, L. ( 2007) "Consulting Citizens: Technologies of Elicitation and the Mobility of Publics," Public Understanding of Science16(3): 279-97.
44.
Loeber, A. and Haila, Y. ( 2009) "Analogue Models and Dynamic Generalization - the Paganini Experience," Paper prepared for presentation at the 4th Interpretive Policy Analysis Conference, "Discourse and Power in Critical Policy Studies," Kassel, 25-7 June.
45.
Mansbridge, J. ( 1990) "Feminism and Democracy," The American Prospect 21 March, URL (consulted February 2009): http://www.prospect.org/cs/author?id=144
46.
Marres, N. ( 2007) "The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy," Social Studies of Science37(5): 759-80.
47.
Michael, M. ( 2009) "Publics Performing Publics: Of PiGs, PiPs and Politics,"Public Understanding of Science18(5): 617-31.
48.
Moore, A. (forthcoming) "Public Bioethics and Public Engagement: The Politics of ‘Proper Talk,’"Public Understanding of Science.
49.
Mouffe, C. ( 2006) On the Political. London and New York: Routledge.
50.
Nowotny, H., Gisler, P., Guggenheim, M., Pohl, C. and Maranta, A. ( 2004) Imaginierte Laien. Die Macht der Vorstellung in wissenschaftlichen Expertisen. Weilerswist: Velbrueck Wissenschaft.
51.
Pestre, D. ( 2008) "Challenges for the Democratic Management of Technoscience: Governance, Participation and the Political Today," Science as Culture17(2): 101-19.
52.
Reardon, J. ( 2007) "Democratic Mis-haps: The Problem of Democratization in a Time of Biopolitics," BioSocieties2(2): 239-56.
53.
Reynolds, L. and Szerszynski, B., with Volakakis, Y. and Kousis, M. ( 2007) GM-Food: The Role of Participation in a Techno-Scientific Controversy. Final Work Package Report for "Participatory Governance and Institutional Innovation" [PAGANINI], funded by the 6th EU FRP (Contract No. CIT2-CT-2004-505791) . URL (consulted February 2009): http://www.univie.ac.at/LSG/paganini/output.htm
54.
Rowe, G. and Frewer, L.J. ( 2004) "Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda," Science, Technology, and Human Values29(4): 512-56.
55.
Salter, B. and Jones, M. ( 2002) "Regulating Human Genetics: The Changing Politics of Biotechnology Governance in the European Union," Health, Risk and Society4(3): 325-40.
56.
Sanders, L. ( 1997) "Against Deliberation," Political Theory25: 347-76.
57.
Sartori, G. ( 1978) "Anti-Elitism Revisited," Government and Opposition13(1): 67-71.
58.
Schicktanz, S. and Naumann, J. ( 2003) Bürgerkonferenz: Streitfall Gendiagnostik. Ein Modellprojekt der Bürgerbeteiligung am bioethischen Diskurs. Opladen : Leske und Budrich.
59.
Schultz, S., Braun, K. and Griessler, E. ( 2007) The Governance of Genetic Testing: Non-Antagonistic Setting , "Authentic Publics" and Moments of Unease. Final Report of Work Package 3, Participatory Governance and Institutional Innovation [PAGANINI]. URL (consulted February 2009): http://www.univie.ac.at/LSG/paganini/output.htm
60.
Sperling, S. ( 2007) "Knowledge Rites and the Right Not to Know," PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review30(2): 269-87.
61.
Stirling, A. ( 2008) "‘Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology ," Science, Technology, and Human Values33(2): 262-94.
62.
Waldschmidt, A., Klein, A. and Tamayo Korte, M. ( 2009) Das Wissen der Leute. Bioethik, Alltag und Macht im Internet . Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
63.
Wynne, B. ( 2002) "Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology: Reflexivity Inside Out?," Current Sociology59(3): 459-77.
64.
Wynne, B. ( 2005) "Risk as Globalizing ‘Democratic’ Discourse? Framing Subjects and Citizens," in M. Leach, I. Scoones and B. Wynne (eds) Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, pp. 66-82. London and New York: Zed Books.
65.
Wynne, B. ( 2006) "Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science: Hitting the Tone but Missing the Music?," Community Genetics9(3): 211-20.
66.
Young, I.M. ( 2002) Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
