The infamous Piltdown hoax offers an excellent opportunity to study how a figure that straddled the human—animal boundary (both figuratively in its positioning as a “missing link,” and literally given its post-hoax status as a modern human skull and a modern orangutan jaw) was made to fit dichotomous understandings of it. The process of making this figure human reveals how scientific claims in the disputed border zone between humans and non-human animals are shaped by the cultural themes upon which the division stands. Nationalism, race and species classification became enmeshed in the efforts to lead Piltdown from its liminal position to more conceptually stable ground. The result was a stretching of human-ness, that brought Piltdown closer to us whilst modern-day “savages” were moved further away. The paper's theoretical framework shifts Gieryn's boundary-work model from an ontology of culture to an ontology of nature. Transplanting Gieryn's model in this way is useful not only because of the parallels specifically between the science—culture and human—animal boundaries, but also as it serves as a reminder of the strong relationship between the categorization of the social and natural worlds.
Abbott, A. (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Bauman, Z. (1991) Modernity and Ambivalence. Oxford: Polity Press.
3.
Blinderman, C. (1986) The Piltdown Inquest. New York : Prometheus Books.
4.
Bromley, M. (1997) "Introduction to Part Two," in M. Bromley and T. O'Malley (eds) A Journalism Reader, pp. 89-90. London : Routledge.
5.
Butler, D. (1975) British Political Facts 1900-1975. Edinburgh: R&R Clark Ltd.
6.
Cartmill, M. (1996) A View to a Death in the Morning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Cassidy, A. (2005) "Popular Evolutionary Psychology in the UK: An Unusual Case of Science in the Media?," Public Understanding of Science14: 115-41.
8.
Cavalieri, P. and Singer, P., eds (1996) The Great Ape Project: Equality Beyond Humanity. London: Fourth Estate.
9.
Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium (2005) "Initial Sequence of the Chimpanzee Genome and Comparison with the Human Genome," Nature437: 69-87.
10.
Daston, L. and Mitman, G. , eds (2005) Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism. New York: Columbia University Press.
11.
Dawson, C. and Woodward, A.S. (1913) "On the Discovery of a Paleolithic Human Skull and Mandible in a Flint-Bearing Gravel Overlying the Wealden (Hastings Beds) at Piltdown, Fletching (Sussex)," Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London69: 117-51.
12.
Dawson, C. and Woodward, A.S. (1915) "On a Bone Implement from Piltdown (Sussex)," Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London71: 144-9.
13.
" Discovery of a Human Skull (Early Pleistocene?) near Lewes" ( 1912) Nature90: 390.
14.
Douglas, M. (1969) Purity and Danger. London: T&A Constable Limited.
15.
Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
16.
Farber, P.L. (2000) Finding Order in Nature: The Naturalist Tradition from Linnaeus to E.O. Wilson. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
17.
Franklin, A. (1999) Animals and Modern Culture. London: SAGE Publications.
18.
Gardner, R.A. and Gardner, B.T. (1975) "Early Signs of Language in Child and Chimpanzee ," Science187(4178): 752-3.
19.
Gentner, T.Q., Fenn, K.M., Margoliash, D. and Nusbaum, H.C. (2006) "Recursive Syntactic Pattern Learning by Songbirds ," Nature440: 1204-7.
20.
Gieryn, T. (1983) "Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists ," American Sociological Review48(6): 781-95.
21.
Gieryn, T. (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Gilbert, N. and Mulkay, M. (1984) Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientist's Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Gosling, S.D. (2001) "From Mice to Men: What Can We Learn about Personality from Animal Research?," Psychological Bulletin127: 45-86.
24.
Goulden, M. (2007) `Bringing Bones to Life: How Science Made Piltdown Man Human', Science as Culture, 16(4): 333-57.
25.
Gray, J. (2002) Straw Dogs: Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals . Chatham: Granta Publications .
26.
Haddon, A.C. (1913) "Eoanthropus Dawsoni," Science37: 91-2.
27.
Haraway, D. (1989) Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.
28.
Hrdlicka, A. (1922) "The Piltdown Jaw," American Journal of Physical Anthropology5: 327-47.
29.
Kawai, M. (1965) "Newly Acquired Pre-Cultural Behavior of the Natural Troop of Japanese Monkeys on Koshima Inlet," Primates6: 1-30.
30.
Keith, A. (1914) "The Significance of the Discovery at Piltdown ," Bedrock2: 435-53.
31.
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
33.
Lee, A. (1980) The Origins of the Popular Press 1855-1914. Guildford: Croom Helm.
34.
MacCurdy, G.G. (1916) "The Revision of Eoanthropus Dawsoni," Science43: 228-31.
35.
Mather, J.A. and Anderson, R.C. (1993) "Personalities of Octopuses (Octopus rubescens) ," Journal of Comparative Psychology107(3): 336-40.
36.
Marks, J. (2003) What it Means to be 98% Chimpanzee. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
37.
Miller, G.S. (1915) "The Jaw of Piltdown Man," Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection65: 1-31.
38.
Miller, G.S. (1918) "The Piltdown Jaw," American Journal of Physical Anthropology1: 25-52.
