Imagining nanotechnology: cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States

Abstract

This paper compares public perceptions of technologies in the United States and Europe. Asked whether nanotechnology will improve our way of life, 50 percent of the US sample say “yes” and 35 percent say “don’t know.” The European figures are almost the mirror image, 29 percent saying “yes” and 53 percent saying “don’t know.” People in the US are also more optimistic than Europeans about eight more familiar technologies. We suggest that people in the US assimilate nanotechnology within a set of pro-technology cultural values. By contrast, in Europe there is more concern about the impact of technology on the environment, less commitment to economic progress and less confidence in regulation. These differences in values are reflected in media coverage, with more emphasis on the potential benefits of nanotechnology in the US than in the UK. Finally, we speculate on possible futures for the reception of nanotechnology in the US and Europe.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bauer, M.W. and Gaskell, G. (eds) (2002) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

Berg, P. , Baltimore, D. , Boyer, H.W. , Cohen, S.N. , Davis, R.W. , Hogness, D.S. , Nathans, D. , Roblin, R. , Watson, J.D. , Weissman, S. and Zinder, N.D. (1974) “Potential Bio-hazards of Recombinant DNA Molecules,” Science 185: 303-303 .

Brumfiel, G. (2003) “A Little Knowledge,” Nature 424: 246–248 .

Einsiedel, E.F. and Goldenberg, L. (2004) “Dwarfing the Social? Nanotechnology Lessons from the Biotechnology Front,” Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 24: 28–33 .

ETC Group (2003) From Genomes to Atoms: The Big Down. Winnipeg, Manitoba: ETC Group . Available: http://www.etcgroup.org

Gaskell, G. , Allum, N. and Stares, S. (2003) Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002. Available: http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/eb/ebs_177_en.pdf

Gaskell, G. , Allum, N. , Wagner, W. , Kronberger, N. , Torgersen, H. and Bardes, J. (2004) “GM Foods and the Misperception of Risk Perception,” Risk Analysis 24(1): 183–192 .

Gaskell, G. , Bauer, M. , Durant, J. and Allum, N. (1999) “Worlds Apart: The Receptions of GM Foods in Europe and the United States,” Science 264(5426): 384–387 .

Gaskell, G. , Einsiedel, E.F. , Priest, S. , Ten Eyck, T. , Allum, N. and Torgersen, H. (2001) “Troubled Waters: The Transatlantic Divide on Biotechnology Policy,” in G. Gaskell and M.W. Bauer (eds) Biotechnology 1996–2000: The Years of Controversy, pp. 96–115. London: Science Museum Press .

10.

Lux Research (2004) The Nanotech Report 2004. Available: http://www.luxresearchinc.com/tnr2004

11.

Mehta, M.D. (2004) “From Biotechnology to Nanotechnology: What Can we Learn from Earlier Technologies?,” Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 24: 34–39 .

12.

Royal Society (2004) Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. London: The Royal Society .

13.

Savage, I. (1993) “Demographic Influences in Risk Perception,” Risk Analysis 13: 413–420 .

14.

Ten Eyck, T. , Gaskell, G. and Jackson, J. (2004) “Seeds, Food and Trade Wars: Public Opinion and Policy Responses in the US and Europe,” Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 10(3): 258–267 .