Engaging the public in the regulation of xenotransplantation: would the Canadian model of public consultation be effective in the US?

Abstract

The value of engaging the public in science policymaking is becoming increasingly controversial. In the US, however, the regulation of biotechnologies remains in the domain of the scientific elite. By contrast, Canada recently conducted a very public process aimed at including the public in the regulation of xenotransplantation. Members of the US xenotransplantation community were asked to comment on the public consultation process with specific attention given to the Canadian consultation on xenotransplantation. These scientists agreed that gathering public opinion is usually desirable but expressed some serious concerns about the methods used to gather these opinions. They challenged the notion of an informed public as defined by the organizers of the Canadian consultation. Therefore, in order for the Canadian model of public consultation to be well received in the US, there would have to be more stringent adherence to representative sampling and more rigorous public education strategies.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AAAS (1993) Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press .

Bach, F. H. and Fineberg, H. V. (1998) “Call for Moratorium on Xenotransplants,” Nature 391: 326–326 .

Chapman, L. (1998) “The Draft U.S. Public Health Service Guideline on Infectious Disease Issues in Xenotransplantation,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 862: 166–170 .

CPHA (2001) Animal-to-human Transplantation: Should Canada Proceed? A Public Consultation on Xenotransplantation. Ottawa, Ontario: CPHA .

Dahl, R. A. (1956) A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .

Garland, M. (1999) “Experts and the Public: a Needed Partnership for Genetic Policy,” Public Understanding of Science 8: 241–254 .

Institute of Medicine (1996) Xenotransplantation: Science, Ethics and Public Policy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press .

NIH (2002) “World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki,” (consulted September 2002): http://history.nih.gov/history/laws/helsinki.html/

Wadman, M. (1998) “FDA Turns Down Moratorium Demand on Xenotransplants,” Nature 391: 423–423 .

10.

Winstanley, D. , Lackey, R. T. , Warnick, W. L. and Malanchuk, J. (1998) “Acid Rain: Science and Policy Making,” Environmental Science and Policy 1: 51–57 .

11.

Wright, J. (2002) “Alternative Representations of the Same Data: Flaws in the Process of Consulting the Canadian Public about Xenotransplantation Issues,” Canadian Medical Association Journal 167: 40–42 .