Many factors may influence the outcome of surveys on how people view the use of animals in research. Some aspects are related to the instrument used, whereas others are related to the characteristics of the respondents. Conducted in Western countries, the study is primarily a review of 56 surveys targeting scientists, students, and the public. Surveys were obtained from searching online databases and reference lists, or directly from authors whose surveys were not otherwise available. Factors related to the instrument listed include the questionnaire used and wording of questions. Factors related to the respondent include age, gender, upbringing, religion, knowledge, education, and practical experience. Results demonstrate that there was great discrepancy in acceptance/opposition estimations reported in different surveys. It is concluded that interpretation and comparison of results from different surveys should be made with caution.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
H. Herzog , A. Rowan, and D. Kossow, “Social attitudes and animals,” in: The State of the Animals, eds. D. J. Salem and A. N. Rowan (Gaithersburg, MD: Humane Society Press, 2001), 55-69.
2.
P. Aldhous , A. Coghlan, and J. Copley, “Let the people speak,”New Scientist162 (1999): 26-31.
3.
Animal experimentation: A survey of information, interest, and opinion on the question among the general public, high school teachers, and practicing physicians (Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center Report No. 39, 1949).
4.
Animals in Medicine and Science. (London: MORI - General Public Research conducted for Medical Research Council, 1999).
5.
Associated Press/General Media Poll (Washington DC: National Association for Biomedical Press, 1985).
6.
B. Baluch and B. Kaur, “Attitude change toward animal experimentation in an academic setting,”The Journal of Psychology129 (1995): 477-479.
7.
J.K. Blackshaw and A.W. Blackshaw, “Student perceptions of attitudes to the human animal bond,”Anthrozoös6 (1993): 190-198.
8.
J. Braithwaite , and V. Braithwaite, “Attitudes toward animal suffering: an exploratory study,”International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems3 (1982): 42-49.
9.
J. Broida , et al., “Personality differences between pro- and anti-vivisectionists,”Society & Animals1 (1993): 129-144.
10.
K. L. Coffmanet al. , “Survey results of transplant patients' attitudes to xenografting,”Psychosomatics39 (1998): 379-383.
11.
D.M. Compton , et al., “Animal rights activism and animal welfare concerns in the academic setting: Levels of activism and the perceived importance of research with animals,”Psychological Reports76 (1995): 23-31.
12.
M. Cronholm, Djurförsök. En undersökning om allmänhetens inställning till användning av djurförsök inom medicinsk forskning. (Stockholm: Sveriges Radios Publik- och Programforskning, no. 3, 1992).
J.J. Eldridge and J.P. Gluck, “Gender differences in attitudes toward animal research,”Ethics & Behavior6 (1996): 239-256.
17.
A. Franklin , B. Tranter, and R. White, “Explaining support for animal rights: a comparison of two recent approaches to humans, nonhuman animals, and postmodernity,”Society & Animals9 (2001): 128-144.
18.
A. Furnham and B. Gunter, The Anatomy of Adolescence (London: Routledge, 1989).
19.
A. Furnham and A. Pinder, “Young people's attitudes to experimentation on animals,”The Psychologist10 (1990): 444-448.
20.
A. Furnham and C. Heyes, “Psychology students' beliefs about animals and animal experimentation,”Personality and Individual Differences15 (1993): 1-10.
S.M. Glick , “Animals for teaching purposes: medical students' attitude,”Medical Education29 (1995): 39-42.
24.
A.C. Gunther , et al., “Congenial public, contrary press, and biased estimates of the climate of opinion,”Public Opinion Quarterly65 (2001): 295-320.
25.
J. Hagelin , H.E. Carlsson, and J. Hau, “Medical students view on the use of animals in biomedical research,”Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Science24 (1997): 151-160.
26.
J. Hagelin , J. Hau, and H.E. Carlsson, “Undergraduate students views on the use of animals in biomedical research,”Academic Medicine74 (1999): 1135-1137.
27.
J. Hagelin , J. Hau, and H.E. Carlsson, “Attitude of Swedish veterinary and medical students to animal experimentation,”Veterinary Record146 (2000): 757-760.
28.
J. Hagelin , et al., “Swedish and Kenyan medical students accept nonhuman primate use in medical research,”Journal of Medical Primatology29 (2000): 431-432.
29.
J. Hagelin , et al., “Using animals in research: attitudes of undergraduate students in Sweden and Texas,” Research and Laboratory Animal Science in the new Millennium. 30th Annual Symposium and Educational Days of the Scandinavian Society for Laboratory Animal Science, May 4-7, 2000.
30.
J. Hagelin , et al., “Influence of pet-ownership on opinions towards the use of animals in biomedical research,”Anthrozoös15 (2002): 251-257.
31.
J.J. Hughes , Seams In the Garment Of Life: The Value Structure Of Environmentalists and Medical Ethicists (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1992).
32.
ICR Survey Research Group , “How AP Poll on Animal Rights Was Conducted,” December 3, 1995.
33.
S.R. Kellert and J.K. Berry, “Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender,”Wildlife Society Bulletin15 (1987): 363-371.
34.
R.C. Kyes and K. B. Kyes, “Use of animals in research questionnaire,”Animal Behavior Society Newsletter37 (1992): 4-6.
35.
N. Lindstrand , “Tre av fyra accepterar djurförsök,”Dagens Nyheter (June 27, 1999): 1, A6.
36.
National Opinion Research Center, www.icpsr.umich.edu/gss/codebook.htm
37.
J.S. Navarro , et al., “Attitudes toward animal research among psychology students in Spain,”Psychological Reports89 (2001): 227-236.
38.
P.W. Nolan and D. Markert, “Ethical reasoning observed: a longitudinal study of nursing students,”Nursing Ethics, 9 (2002): 243-258.
39.
P.W. Nolan and J.Smith, “Ethical awareness among first year medical, dental and nursing students,”International Journal of Nursing Studies32 (1995): 506-517.
40.
E.A. Oliveira , and G. B. Frizzo, “Animais reais e virtuais no sul do Brasil: Atitudes e practices laboratoriais,”Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 17 (2001): 143-150.
41.
L. Pifer , K. Shimizu, and R. Pifer, “Public attitudes toward animal research: some international comparisons,”Society & Animals2 (1994): 95-113.
42.
S. Plous , “An attitude survey of animal rights activists,”Psychological Science2 (1991): 194-196.
43.
S. Plous , “Attitudes toward the use of animals in psychological research and education: results from a national survey of psychologists,”American Psychologist51 (1996): 1167-1180.
44.
S. Plous , “Attitudes toward the use of animals in psychological research and education: results from a national survey of psychology majors,”Psychological Science7 (1996): 352-358.
45.
G. Richmond , M. Engelmann, and L.R. Krupka, “The animal research controversy, exploring student attitudes,”The American Biology Teacher52 (1990): 467-471.
46.
R.S. Shurtleff , et al., “A nationwide survey of veterinary students' values and attitudes on ethical issues,”Journal of Veterinary Medical Education9 (1983): 93-96.
47.
J.E. Sieber , “Students' and scientists' attitudes on animal research,”The American Biology Teacher48 (1986): 85-91.
48.
M. Stanisstreet , N. Spofforth, and T. Williams, “Attitudes of undergraduate students to the uses of animals,”Studies in Higher Education18 (1993): 177-196.
49.
Survey of American adults: Report of findings, (New York: Kane, Parsons and Associates, Inc.1989).
50.
Survey of Public Attitudes Toward and Understanding of Science and Technology (National Society Foundation, 1988, 1990, 1992, 1995, 1997, 1999, 2001), www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/seind00/append/c8/at08-28.xls, www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/seind00/append/c8/at08-29.xls.
51.
H. Takooshian , “Opinions on animal research: scientists vs. the public?”PsyETA Bulletin7 (1988): 5, 8-9.
52.
H. Takooshian , Lab animal controversy: scientists vs. the public?, Symposium on selected perspectives on animal rights research, for the meeting on “Earthtalk,” (New Haven, CT: The Eastern Communications Association Conference, April 29-May 2, 1993)
53.
P. Tamir and E. Sever, “Students' attitudes toward the use of animals in biology teaching,”The American Biology Teacher42 (1980): 100-103, 109.
54.
D. Tennov , “Pain infliction in animal research,” in Animals in Education, eds. H. McGiffin and N. Brownley (Washington: Institute for the Study of Animal Problems, 1980), 35-40.
55.
M. Vigorito , “An animal rights attitude survey of undergraduate psychology students,”Psychological Reports79 (1996): 131-142.
56.
D.L. Wells , and P.G. Hepper, “Pet ownership and adults' views on the use of animals”Society & Animals5 (1997): 45-63.
57.
K. L. Wuensch , and G. M. Poteat, “Evaluating the morality of animal research: effects of ethical ideology, gender and purpose,”Journal of Social Behavior and Personality13 (1998): 139-150.
58.
E. G. Carmines , and R. A. Zeller, Reliability and Validity Assessment (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979).
59.
J.L. Sullivan , J. Pierson, and G. E. Marcus, “Ideological constraint in the mass public: a methodological critique and some new findings,”American Journal of Political Science, 22 (1978): 233-249.
60.
M. Stanisstreet , N. Spofforth, and T. Williams, Studies in Higher Education18 (1993): 177.
61.
D. R. Lehmann , and J. Hulbert, “Are three-point scales always good enough?,”Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (1972): 444-446.
62.
B. Baluch and B. Kaur, The Journal of Psychology129 (1995): 477.
63.
G.V. Thomas , and D. Blackman, “The future of animal studies in psychology,”American Psychologist47 (1992): 1679.
64.
European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animal used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes, ETS 123 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1985).
65.
J. Hagelin , et al., Journal of Medical Primatology29 (2000): 431.
66.
W. Gehrke , and R. Wiezorrek, Aspekte der Mensch-Tier-Beziehungen im Bereich Wissenschaftlicher Tierexperimente. (Hannover: Der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, 1982).
67.
Animals in Medicine and Science (MORI: General Public Research conducted for Medical Research Council, 1999).
68.
G. Richmond , M. Engelmann, and L.R. Krupka, The American Biology Teacher52 (1990): 467.
69.
K. L. Wuensch , and G. M. Poteat, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13 (1998): 139.
70.
J. Hagelin , J. Hau, and H.E. Carlsson, Veterinary Record146 (2000): 757.
71.
M. Turcotte , “The opposition of rural and urban a thing of the past?—The case of moral traditionalism,”Canadian Journal of Sociology26 (2001): 1-29.
72.
C.W. Peek , M.A. Konty, and T.E. Frazier, “Religion and ideological support for social movements: The case of animal rights,”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion36 (1997b): 429-439.
73.
J.J. Eldridge and J.P. Gluck, Ethics & Behavior6 (1996): 239.
74.
J.W. Driscoll , Anthrozoös5 (1992): 32.
75.
A. Furnham and A. Pinder, The Psychologist10 (1990): 444.
76.
A. Franklin , B. Tranter, and R. White, Society & Animals9 (2001): 128.
77.
S. H. Priest , “US public opinion divided over biotechnology,”Nature Biotechnology18 (2000): 939-942.
78.
G. Gaskell , et al., Nature Biotechnology18 (2000): 935.
79.
H. Takooshian , PsyETA Bulletin7 (1988): 5.
80.
J. Broida , et al., Society & Animals1 (1993): 129.
81.
L. Pifer , K. Shimizu, and R. Pifer, Society & Animals2 (1994): 95.
82.
L.K. Pifer , Society & Animals4 (1996): 37.
83.
D.L. Wells , and P.G. Hepper, Society & Animals5 (1997): 45.
84.
E. S. Paul and J.A. Serpell, “Childhood per keeping and humane attitudes in young adulthood,”Animal Welfare2 (1993): 321-337.
85.
J.K. Blackshaw and A.W. Blackshaw, Anthrozoös6 (1993): 190.
86.
A. Furnham and A. Pinder, The Psychologist10 (1990): 444.
87.
J. Hagelin , et al., “Influence of pet-ownership,” p. 251.
88.
J. Hagelin , J. Hau, and H.E. Carlsson, Academic Medicine74 (1999): 1135.
89.
C.W. Peek , M.A. Konty, and T.E. Frazier, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion36 (1997): 429.
90.
L. Pifer , K. Shimizu, and R. Pifer, Society & Animals2 (1994): 95.
91.
G.V. Thomas , and D. Blackman, American Psychologist47 (1992): 1679.
92.
B. Baluch and B. Kaur, The Journal of Psychology129 (1995): 477.
93.
J. Hagelin , J. Hau, and H.E. Carlsson, Veterinary Record146 (2000): 757.
94.
M. Lodge , K.M. McGraw, and P. Stroh, “An impression driven-model of candidate evaluation,”American Political Science Review83 (1989): 399-420.
95.
J. Hagelin , et al., “Using animals in research: Attitudes of undergraduate students in Sweden and Texas,” Research and Laboratory Animal Science in the new Millennium. 30th Annual Symposium and Educational Days of the Scandinavian Society for Laboratory Animal Science, May 4-7, 2000.
96.
J. Hagelin , J. Hau, and H.E. Carlsson, Veterinary Record146 (2000): 757.
97.
L.K. Pifer , Society & Animals4 (1996): 37.
98.
J.J. Eldridge and J.P. Gluck, Ethics & Behavior6 (1996): 239.
99.
J. Braithwaite , and V. Braithwaite, International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems, 3 (1982): 42.
100.
H.A. Herzog , and L.B. Dorr, “Electronically available surveys of attitudes toward animals,”Society & Animals8 (2000): 183-190.
101.
The influential book on the 3 Rs by M.S. Russell and R.L. Burch may also reflect this, The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique (London: Methuen, 1959) was not widely recognized until the mid 1970's within the scientific community.
102.
M.T. Phillips , and J.A. Sechzer, Animal Research and Ethical Conflict. An Analysis of the Scientific Literature: 1966-1986. (Ann Arbor: Springer Verlag, 1989).
103.
Survey of Public Attitudes Toward and Understanding of Science and Technology (National Society Foundation, 1988, 1990, 1992, 1995, 1997, 1999).
104.
D.M. Compton , et al., Psychological Reports76 (1995): 23.
105.
A.C. Gunther , et al., Public Opinion Quarterly65 (2001): 295.
106.
R. Hill , et al., “Animal experimentation needs dissection”Nature391 (1998): 117.
107.
C. Hagedorn , and A. Allender-Hagedorn, “Issues in agricultural and environmental biotechnology: identifying and comparing biotechnology issues from public opinion surveys, the popular press and technical/regulatory sources,”Public Understanding of Science6 (1997): 233-245.
