This paper argues that public understanding of climate change not only involves knowledge of its physical processes, but also encompasses wider issues concerning the relation between society and nature. It examines the conclusions of previous research, and assumptions made within the policy community concerning public understanding of climate change. It is argued that in each case, in accordance with the information deficit model, recorded levels of ignorance are seen as a barrier to effective public involvement in the policy process. This view is challenged by research findings from Newcastle, Australia. Public understanding of global environmental issues drew not only on scientific information, but also on local knowledges, values, and moral responsibilities. Further, respondents connected the issue to their communities, and suggested that individual action is morally sanctioned, despite concerns for the efficacy of such action and the lack of government or industry support. Where institutional realignment has occurred to provide renewable energy to householders, public involvement has been forthcoming. These findings suggest that rather than focus on the provision of information, policy attention should be directed to the social and institutional barriers that act to constrain public involvement in addressing global environmental issues.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EdenS., “Public participation in environmental policy: considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions,”Public Understanding of Science5 (1996): 183–204;
2.
IrwinA. and WynneB. (eds.), Misunderstanding Science? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
3.
EdenS., “Public participation in environmental policy: considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions,”Public Understanding of Science5 (1996): 192.
4.
Environment Protection Agency, NSW, Who cares about the environment? A benchmark survey of the environmental knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviour of the people of NSW (Prepared by Keys Young), (Sydney, Australia, Environment Protection Agency, 1994);
5.
TranterB., “The social bases of environmentalism in Australia,”Australia and New Zealand Journal of Sociology32 (1996): 61–85;
6.
WitherspoonS., and MartinJ., “What do we mean by green?” JowellR., BrookL., PriorG., and TaylorB. (eds.), British Social Attitudes: The 9th Report (Aldershot, Dartmouth: Social and Community Planning Research, 1992): 1–26;
7.
WorsleyA., and SkrzypiecG., “Environmental attitudes of senior secondary school students in South Australia,”Global Environmental Change8, (1998): 209–225;
8.
YoungK., “Living under threat,” in JowellR., BrookL., PriorG., and TaylorB. (eds.), British Social Attitudes: The 7th Report (Aldershot, Dartmouth: Social and Community Planning Research, 1990): 77–108;
9.
YoungK., “Shades of green,” in JowellR., BrookL., PriorG., and TaylorB. (eds.), British Social Attitudes: The 8th Report (Aldershot, Dartmouth: Social and Community Planning Research, 1991): 107–130.
10.
EckersleyR., “Green politics and the new class: selfishness or virtue?”Political Studies 37 (1989): 205–223;
11.
InglehartR., The silent revolution: changing values and political styles among western publics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977);
12.
EckersleyR., “Values and visions: youth and the failure of modern western culture,”Shaping School Futures Forum (February 1994): 17–18;
13.
ElkinsK. and SansonA., “Children's views of the future: concerns expressed in letters and questionnaires in the post cold war period,” in HägglundS., HakvoortI., and OppenheimerL., (eds.), Research on children and peace: international perspectives Report No. 1996:04 (Department of Education and Educational Research, Göteborg University, 1996).
14.
StanisstreetM., and BoyesE., “Young people's ideas about global environmental issues” in HarrisG., and BlackwellC. (eds.). Environmental Issues in Education (Arena, Aldershot, 1996): 40.
15.
WorsleyA. and SkrzypiecG., “Environmental attitudes of senior secondary school students in South Australia,”Global Environmental Change 8 (1998): 209–225.
16.
BostromA., MorganM. Granger, FischoffB., and ReadD., “What do people know about global climate change? 1: mental models,”Risk Analysis14 no. 6 (1994): 959–970;
17.
DunlapR. E., “Lay perceptions of global risk: public views of global warming in cross-national context,”International Sociology13 no. 4 (1998): 473–498;
18.
KemptonW., BosterJ., and HartleyJ., Environmental values in American culture (Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995);
19.
ReadD., BostromA., Granger MorganM., FischoffB., and SmutsT., “What do people know about climate change? 2. survey studies of educated laypeople,”Risk Analysis, 14 no. 6 (1994): 971–981.
20.
The term ‘policy network’ is used to include the range of actors and institutions involved in the climate change policy process. Within this network, two coalitions can be identified, the resource-based coalition and the greenhouse action coalition, who share common understandings of the policy problem, though are not necessarily united by common beliefs or interests. Sec H. Bulkeley, “Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network,” Environment and Planning C: government and policy (in press, 1999);
21.
HajerM., The politics of environmental discourse (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995)
22.
BlakeJ., “Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience,”Local Environment4 no. 3 (1999): 257–278;
23.
BulkeleyH., “Global risk, local values: ‘risk society’ and the greenhouse issue in Newcastle, Australia,”Local Environment2 no. 3 (1997): 261–274;
24.
BurgessJ., HarrisonC., and FiliusP., “Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship,”Environment and Planning A30 (1998): 1445–1460;
25.
EdenS., “Individual environmental responsibility and its role in public environmentalism,”Environment and Planning A25 (1993): 1743–1758;
26.
EdenS., “Public participation in environmental policy: considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions,”Public Understanding of Science5 (1996): 183–204;
27.
MacnaghtenP., and JacobsM., “Public identification with sustainable development: investigating cultural barriers to participation,”Global Environmental Change7 no. 1 (1997): 5–24.
28.
BurgessJ., HarrisonC., and FiliusP., “Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship,”Environment and Planning A30 (1998): 1446.
29.
BulkeleyH., Valuing the Global Environment: publics, politics and participation (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 1999).
30.
For further discussion see ThompsonM. and RaynerS., “Risk and Governance Part 1: the discourses of climate change,”Governance and Opposition33 no. 2 (1998): 139–166.
31.
DunlapR. E., “Lay perceptions of global risk: public views of global warming in cross-national context.”
32.
DunlapR. E., “Lay perceptions of global risk: public views of global warming in cross-national context;” see also BostromA., Granger MorganM., FischoffB., and ReadD., “What do people know about global climate change? 1: mental models,” Risk Analysis14 no. 6 (1994): 959–970;
33.
Henderson-Sellers, “Australian public perception of the Greenhouse issue,”Climatic Change17 (1990): 69–96;
34.
KemptonW., “Lay perspectives on global climatic change,”Global Environmental Change1 no. 3 (1991): 183–208;
35.
Kempton., Environmental values in American culture; ReadD., BostromA., Granger MorganM., FischoffB., and SmutsT., “What do people know about climate change? 2. survey studies of educated laypeople,”Risk Analysis14 no. 6 (1994): 971–981.
36.
Kempton, “Lay perspectives on global climatic change;” Kempton, ., Environmental values in American culture.
37.
Bostrom., “What do people know about global climate change? 1: mental models;” Read, ., “What do people know about climate change? 2. survey studies of educated laypeople.”
38.
Bostrom, ., “What do people know about global climate change? 1: mental models.”
39.
Read, ., “What do people know about climate change? 2. survey studies of educated laypeople.”
40.
Read, ., “What do people know about climate change? 2. survey studies of educated laypeople.”
41.
For example, BerkR.A. and SchulmanD., “Public perceptions of global warning,”Climatic Change29 (1995): 1–33;
42.
Henderson-Sellers, “Australian public perception of the Greenhouse issue;”McDanielsT., AxelrodL.J., and SlovicP., “Perceived ecological risks of global change,” Global Environmental Change6 no. 2 (1996): 159–171;
43.
MacnaghtenP. and JacobsM., “Public identification with sustainable development: investigating cultural barriers to participation,”Global Environmental Change7 no. 1 (1997): 10; see also BlakeJ. “Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience,” Local Environment 4 no. 3 (1999): 257–278;
44.
Burgess., “Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship;”MacnaghtenP. and UrryJ., Contested Natures (London: Sage, 1998).
45.
Blake “Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience;”Burgess., “Environmental communication and the cultural polities of environmental citizenship;”Macnaghten., “Public identification with sustainable development: investigating cultural barriers to participation.”
46.
The National Greenhouse Strategy: strategic framework for advancing Australia's Greenhouse response (Canberra, Australian Greenhouse Office, Commonwealth of Australia, 1998).
47.
Interviews with the Australian Bureau of Resource Economics, February 1997; Australian Conservation Foundation, January 1997; Australian Consumers Association December 1996; Business Council of Australia, February 1997; and Greenpeace, May, November, December 1996.
48.
Macnaghten., Contested Natures, p. 87.
49.
BurninghamK. and O'BrienM., “Global environmental values and local contexts of action,Sociology,” 28 no. 4 (1994): 913–932;
50.
Blake (1999) outlines the psychological approach that underpins this perspective (in “Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience,” pp. 264–265). He argues that while the social and institutional dimensions of public understandings of environmental issues are increasingly considered within this genre, he suggests that it remains largely focused on how individual views are formed and held, rather than offering any perspective on how (social) institutions enable and constrain action.
51.
Dunlap“Lay perceptions of global risk: public views of global warming in cross-national context,” p. 490.
52.
Blake“Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience,” pp. 266–270.
53.
JaegerC., DurrenbergerG., KastenholzH., and TrufferB., “Determinants of environmental action with regard to climatic change,”Climatic Change23 (1993): 193–211.
54.
Blake“Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience,” pp. 257–278;
55.
Burgess, ., “Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship.”
56.
Hajer, The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process, p. 1.
57.
Kempton. Environmental values in American culture, pp. 2–3.
58.
BeckU., Risk Society: towards a new modernity (London: Sage, 1992).
59.
WynneB., “May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide,” in LashS., SzerszynskiB., and WynneB. (eds.) Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology, (London: Sage, 1996): 44–83.
60.
BeckU., “World risk society as cosmopolitan society? Ecological questions in a framework of manufactured uncertainties,”Theory, Culture and Society13 no. 4 (1996): 1–32;
61.
Blake, “Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience;”Burgess, ., “Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship;” Burningham, ., “Global environmental values and local contexts of action;” Eden “Individual environmental responsibility and its role in public environmentalism;” Eden, “Public participation in environmental policy: considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions;” Grove-WhiteR. and SzerszynskiB., “Getting behind environmental ethics,” Environmental Values1 no. 4 (1992): 285–296;
62.
HarrisonC., BurgessJ. and FiliusP., “Rationalizing environmental responsibilities: a comparison of lay public in the UK and the Netherlands,”Global Environmental Change6 no. 3 (1996): 215–234;
63.
HinchliffeS., “Helping the earth begins at home: the social construction of socio-environmental responsibilities,”Global Environmental Change, 6 no. 1 (1996): 53–62;
64.
HinchliffeS., “Locating risk: energy use, the ‘ideal’ home and the non-ideal world,”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series, 22 (1997): 197–209;
65.
Macnaghten., “Public identification with sustainable development: investigating cultural barriers to participation;” Macnaghten, et al., “Contested natures.”
66.
In quotes from focus groups each line starts with the initial of the respondent's first name, HB (moderator) represents the author.
67.
Dunlap, “Lay perceptions of global risk: public views of global warming in cross-national context.”
68.
Bostrom., “What do people know about global climate change? 1: mental models;” Henderson-Sellers, “Australian public perception of the Greenhouse issue;” Kempton et al., Environmental values in American culture; Read et al., “What do people know about climate change? 2. survey studies of educated laypeople.”
69.
The Sydney Morning Herald, 26.11.97, “PM out of step on greenhouse,” SMH, Sydney. This is less than the 56 percent recorded by Environment Protection Agency, NSW in Who cares about the environment? A benchmark survey of the environmental knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviour of the people of NSW (Sydney, Environment Protection Agency, Prepared by Keys Young, 1994).
70.
Thompson., “Risk and Governance Part 1: the discourses of climate change,” pp. 152–3.
71.
Blake, “Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience;”Burgess., “Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship;” Macnaghten., “Public identification with sustainable development: investigating cultural barriers to participation.”
72.
Some respondents immediately answered this question as if ‘contribute’ were a positive act. Read ., “What do people know about climate change? 2. survey studies of educated laypeople,” also found this type of response, which they interpret as a lack of public understanding of the question. However, a more sensitive analysis might conclude that such a question provokes a feeling that respondents should be doing something.
73.
The BMP steelworks dominates the industrial skyline of Newcastle and has been a mainstay of the economy over the past century. It is set to close by 2000.
74.
Read ., “What do people know about climate change? 2. survey studies of educated laypeople;” Greenpeace, Interview May 1996; Henderson-Sellers, “Australian public perception of the Greenhouse issue;” The Sydney Morning Herald.
75.
Dunlap, “Lay perceptions of global risk: public views of global warming in cross-national context;” Read ., “What do people know about climate change? 2. survey studies of educated laypeople.”
76.
For example, Henderson-Sellers, “Australian public perception of the Greenhouse issue;” Read ., “What do people know about climate change? 2. survey studies of educated laypeople.”
77.
When discussion was slow participants were encouraged to write ideas down on cards and then discuss them.
78.
Beck, Risk Society: towards a new modernity.
79.
Eden, “Public participation in environmental policy: considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions.”
80.
MichaelM., “Lay discourses of science: science-in-general, science-in-particular, and self,”Science, Technology and Human Values, 17 no. 3(1992): 313–333;
81.
Wynne, “May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide.”
82.
Wynne“May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-Jay knowledge divide,” p. 50.
83.
Beck, Risk Society; towards a new modernity, p. 28.
84.
Macnaghten., Public perceptions and sustain-ability in Lancashire;” Wynne, “May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide.”
85.
Greenhouse: not just an environmental issue (Australian Coal Association, Sydney: New South Wales, Minerals Council Limited and Queensland Coal Operators, 1996); The Sydney Morning Herald.
86.
Burgess., “Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship;” Eden, “Individual environmental responsibility and its role in public environmentalism;” Harrison et al., “Rationalizing environmental responsibilities: a comparison of lay public in the UK and the Netherlands;” Hinchliffe, “Helping the earth begins at home: the social construction of socio-environmental responsibilities;” Hinchliffe, “Locating risk: energy use, the ‘ideal’ home and the non-ideal world;” Macnaghten et al., “Public identification with sustainable development: investigating cultural barriers to participation;” Macnaghten et al., Contested Natures.
87.
Harrison., “Rationalizing environmental responsibilities: a comparison of lay public in the UK and the Netherlands,” p. 225.
88.
Macnaghten., “Public identification with sustainable development: investigating cultural barriers to participation,” p. 16.
89.
EnergyAustralia, Interview, December 1996.
90.
EnergyAustralia, 8.8.96, Pure Energy option a national first, media release, Sydney, EnergyAustralia.
EnergyAustralia, 1996, Pure Energy, publicity material (Sydney: EnergyAustralia).
93.
Green energy is currently a tiny proportion of the total energy market, however the rate of investment in renewable energy has been rapid and public uptake of such schemes enthusiastic.
94.
Bulkeley, Valuing the Global Environment: publics, politics and participation.
Hajer, The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process.
97.
Hinchliffe, “Locating risk: energy use, the ‘ideal’ home and the non-ideal world.”
98.
Blake, “Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience;”HaywardB., “The greening of participatory democracy: a reconsideration of theory,”Environmental Politics, 4 no. 4 (1995): 215–236.
