Recognition of intentionality and the possibility of agency in non-human others is a prerequisite for a process of mutual adjustment and dialogue that could replace current reductive and dualistic human-centred theories. John Andrews’ article in this issue of Environmental Values is criticised for misattributing to me the view that intentionality could be a sole criterion for moral worth – a view which I reject as unacceptably hierarchical and human-centred. To clarify my position, the values and limitations of different kinds of ranking are discussed; and the concept of intentionality is explored, with particular reference to apparently purposeful machines and to Dennett's theory of consciousness.
Dennett, Daniel C. 1996. Kinds of Minds.London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
10.
FriedmanMarilyn1993. What Are Friends For? Feminist Perspectives on Personal Relationships and Moral Theory.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
11.
FryeMarilyn1983. The Politics of Reality.New York: The Crossing Press.
12.
GareArran1998. ‘MacIntyre, Narratives and Environmental Ethics’, Environmental Ethics20(2): 3–18.
13.
GriffinDavid R.1992. Animal Minds.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
HarawayDonna1991. ‘The Cyborg Manifesto’, in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: the Reinvention of Nature, pp. 149–181. London: Routledge.
15.
HardingSandra (ed.) 1993. The Racial Economy of Science.Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
16.
HydeLewis1979. The Gift: Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property. New York: Vantage.
17.
IrigarayLuce1985. Speculum of the Other Woman. trans. Gillian C. Gill. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
18.
JohnsonMark1987. The Body in the Mind.Chicago: Chicago University Press.
19.
LukeBrian1995 ‘Solidarity Across Diversity: a Pluralistic Rapprochement of Environmentalism and Animal Liberation’, Social Theory and Practice21(2); also in RogerS. Gottlieb (ed.) 1997, The Ecological Community, pp. 333–358 (London: Routledge).
20.
MartinEmily1995. ‘Working Across the Human-Other Divide’, in LyndaBirke and RuthHubbard (eds) Reinventing Biology, pp. 261–275. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
21.
Oxalis, VioletWoodsorrel and HickoryShagbark1999. ‘Environmental Ethics as Environmental Etiquette: Towards an Ethics-based Epistemology in Environmental Philosophy’, Environmental Ethics, forthcoming.
22.
PlumwoodVal1993a. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature.London: Routledge.
23.
PlumwoodVal1993b. ‘The Politics of Reason: Towards a Feminist Logic’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy71(4): 436–462.
24.
PlumwoodVal1996. ‘Anthrocentrism and Androcentrism: Parallels and Politics’, Ethics and the Environment1(2): 119–152.
25.
PlumwoodVal1997. ‘Babe : the Tale of the Speaking Meat’, Animal Issues1(1 and 2): 21–36.
26.
PlumwoodVal1998a. ‘Ecojustice, Inequality and Ecological Rationality’, in JohnDryzek and DavidSchlosberg (eds) Debating the Earth: the Environmental Politics Reader.Oxford University Press.
27.
PlumwoodVal1998b. ‘Deep Ecology, Deep Pockets, and Deep Problems : a Feminist Eco-Socialist Analysis’, Ecopolitics X Proceedings, to appear.
28.
RogersLesley J.1997. Minds of Their Own : Thinking and Awareness in Animals.Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
29.
RuddickSara1989. Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace.New York: Ballantine.
30.
SmithMick1997. ‘Against the Enclosure of the Ethical Commons: Radical Environmentalism as an “Ethics of Place”’, Environmental Ethics18(1): 339–353.
31.
SnyderGary1990. The Practice of the Wild.New York: North Point Press.
32.
WallsLaura Dassow1995. Seeing New Worlds: Henry David Thoreau and Nineteenth Century Natural Science.University of Wisconsin, Madison.
33.
WarrenKaren1990. ‘The Power and Promise of Ecological Feminism’, Environmental Ethics12(2): 121–46.
34.
WestonAnthony1996. ‘Self-Validating Reduction: Toward a Theory of Environmental Devaluation’, Environmental Ethics18: 115–132.
35.
WestonAnthony1998. ‘Universal Consideration as an Originary Practice’, Environmental Ethics20: 265–277.
36.
WinnerLangdon1986. The Whale and the Reactor.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
