Balancing Hydropower and Environmental Values: The Resource Management Implications of the US Electric Consumers Protection Act and the AWARE™ Software

Abstract

This paper reviews the AWARE™ software distributed by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). The program is designed to facilitate the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license renewal process for US hydropower installations. The discussion reviews the regulatory, legal, and social contexts that give rise to the creation and distribution of AWARE™. The principal legal impetus for AWARE™ is the Electric Consumer Protection Act (ECPA) of 1986 that directs FERC to give equal consideration to power and non-power resources during relicensing. The software is reviewed in this paper from several perspectives including those of natural resource economics, systems modeling, and the social context within which FERC licensing decisions are made. We examine both the software and its underlying methodology and find significant problems with each. Because of its flaws, AWARE™ does little to further ECPA's equal consideration requirement. We find that the conservation and restoration impact of ECPA for US fisheries could be seriously hampered by the widespread use of AWARE™.

Keywords

AWARE™Electric Consumer Protection Act hydropower water resources Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aristotle. 1988. The Politics ( Everson

[ed.]). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Arrow

Kenneth J.

1963. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.

Arrow

K.J.

1971. Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Chicago: Markham.

Arrow

, Solow

, Portnoy

P.R.

, Leamer

E.E.

, Radner

and Schuman

1993. Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Washington, D.C.: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Draft).

Boyd

D.W.

, Nease

R.F.

Jr. , Rice

J.S.

and Taleb-Ibrahimi

1990. Evaluating Hydro Relicensing Alternatives: Impacts on Power and Non-power Values of Water Resources. (EPRI GS-6922, Final report, August) Palo Alto, California: Electric Power Research Institute.

Decision Focus, Inc. 1991. AWARE™ User's Manual. Palo Alto, California: Electric Power Research Institute.

Douglas

Aaron J.

and Johnson

Richard L.

1993. ‘Instream Flow Assessment and Economic Valuation: a Survey of Nonmarket Benefits Research’, International Journal of Environmental Studies 43: 89–104.

Fisher

Roger

and Ury

William

1983. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. New York: Penguin Books.

Grimm

Lydia T.

1990. ‘Fishery Protection and FERC Hydropower Relicensing Under ECPA: Maintaining a Deadly Status Quo’, Environmental Law 20: 929–73.

10.

Hunt

Richard T.

1991. Lessons Learned in Hydro Relicensing (1984–1989): Trends, Costs, and Recommendations. (EPRI GS-7324 Interim Report, May) Palo Alto, California, Electric Power Research Institute.

11.

Joint Committee 1986. Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference. (Report 99–934) Washington, D.C.: Joint House and Senate Committee on the Electric Consumers Protection Act, 99th Congress.

12.

Just

Richard E.

, Hueth

D.L.

and Schmitz

1982. Applied Welfare Economics and Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

13.

Lamb

Berton L.

and Taylor

Jonathan G.

1990. ‘Negotiation Techniques to Resolve Western Water Disputes’, Water Resources Bulletin 26: 967–975.

14.

Loomis

John B.

1987. An Economic Evaluation of Public Trust Resources of Mono Lake (Institute of Ecology Report Number 30). Davis: University of California.

15.

Loomis

J.B.

, Hanemann

W.M.

and Wegge

T.C.

1990. Environmental Benefits Study of San Joaquin Valley's Fish and Wildlife Resources. Sacramento, California: Jones and Stokes Associates.

16.

Lord

W.B.

, Deane

D.H.

and Waterstone

1979. Commensuration in Federal Water Resource Planning: Problem Analysis and Research Appraisal. (Report 79-2) Denver, Colorado: Bureau of Reclamation Engineering and Research Center.

17.

McPhee

John

1971. Encounters with the Archdruid. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

18.

National Wildlife Foundation 1992. Unpublished letter to EPRI. Washington D.C.

19.

Olsen

, Richards

and Scott

R. D.

1991. ‘Existence and Sport Values for Doubling the Size of Columbia River Basin Salmon and Steelhead Runs’, Rivers 2: 44–56.

20.

de Toqueville

Alexis

1969. Democracy in America (Edited by Meyer

J.P.

and Kerr

A.P.

). Garden City, New York: Doubleday and Company.

21.

US House Committee on Energy and Commerce 1986. Electric Consumer's Protection Act of 1985. (House Report 99-507) Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

22.

Vetterick

, Crouse

, and Thomas

1991. Anadromous Fish Habitat Management Plan for the Columbia and Snake River Basins. (BLM-OR-ES-91-1792) Portland, Oregon: Bureau of Land Management.

23.

Walsh

R.G.

, Sanders

L.D.

and Loomis

J.B.

1984. ‘Measuring the Economic Benefits of Proposed Wild and Scenic Rivers’. In Popadic

J.S.

, Butterfield

D.I.

, Anderson

D.H.

, and Popadic

M.R.

(eds) National River Recreation Symposium Proceedings, pp. 301, 315. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University.