While citizens often use non-instrumental arguments to support environmental protection, most governmental policies are justified by instrumental arguments. This paper explores some of the reasons. We interviewed senior policy advisors to four European governments active in global climate change negotiations and the UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development) process. In response to our questions, a majority of these advisors articulated deeply held personal environmental values. They told us that they normally keep these values separate from their professional environmental policy activities. We interpret these findings within the context of the literature on environmental ethics and values. We suggest that environmental policy could be improved if widely held environmental values were articulated, validated, and admitted into the process of policy analysis and deliberation.
BarbierE.B., MarkandyaA., and PearceD.W.1990 “Environmental Sustainability and Cost-Benefit Analysis”, Environment and Planning A22: 1259–1266.
2.
BerkesF. and FolkeC.1992 “A Systems Perspective on the Interrelations between Natural, Human-Made, and Cultural Capital”, Ecological Economics.5(1): 1–8.
3.
BerryWendell1991 “The Futility of Global Thinking”, in Learning to Listen to the Land, edited by WillersBill, pp. 150–6. Washington, Island Press.
4.
BrennanAndrew1992 “Moral Pluralism and the Environment”, Environmental Values1(1): 15–33.
5.
Bundestag1989 “Protecting the Earth's Atmosphere: An International Challenge”, Report of the Study Commission of the 11th German Bundestag. Bundestag, Germany.
6.
CostanzaRobert1987 “Social Traps and Environmental Policy”, Bioscience37(6): 409–412.
7.
CrossJ.G. and GuyerM.J.1980Social Traps.Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press.
8.
DalyHerman E. and CobbJohn B1989For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future.Boston, Beacon Press.
9.
DalyHerman E.1991a “Boundless Bull,” in Learning to Listen to the Land, edited by WillersBill, pp. 232–238. Washington, Island Press.
10.
DalyHerman E.1991b Steady State Economics.Washington, Island Press, second edition with new essays.
11.
DasguptaP.1992 “Nutritution, Non-Convexities and Redistributive Policies”, in The Future of Economics, edited by HayJ.D., pp. 23–6. Cambridge, MA, Blackwell Publishers.
12.
DevallBill and Sessions, George 1985Deep Ecology: Living As If People Mattered.Salt Lake City, Utah, Peregrine Smith Books.
13.
DunlapRiley E., GallupGeorge H. and GallupAlec M.1992 “The Health of the Planet Survey”, Princeton, New Jersey, The George H. Gallup International Institute (Report, May).
14.
GoodlandR., editor 1990Race to Save the Tropics: Ecology and Economics for a Sustainable Future.Washington, Island Press.
15.
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN)1980World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development.Gland, Switzerland, IUCN.
16.
KemptonWillett, 1991 “Lay Perspectives on Global Climate Change”, Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions1: 183–208.
17.
KemptonWillett and CraigPaul. European Thinking on Global Climate Change. To appear in Environment, April 1993.
18.
LöfstedtRagnar E.1992 “Lay Perspectives Concerning Global Climate Change in Sweden”, Energy and Environment3(2): 161 - 75.
19.
LöfstedtRagnar E.1993 “Lay perspectives concerning global climate change in Vienna, Austria” Energy & Environment (forthcoming in volume 4).
20.
LoomisJ.B.1986 “Assessing Wildlife and Environmental Values in Cost-Benefit Analysis: State of the Art”, Journal of Environmental Management22: 125–131. Majone, Giandomenico 1989 Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, Yale University Press.
21.
McNeeleyJ.A.1988Economics and Biological Diversity: Developing and Using Economic Incentives to Conserve Biological Resources.Gland, Switzerland, IUCN.
22.
MillJohn Stuart1970 “Of the Stationary State,” Chapter VI, in Principles of Political Economy: Books IV and V, (reprint of 1848 edition), pp. 111–17. New York, Penguin Books.
23.
MitchellRobert Cameron and CarsonRichard T.1989Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method.Washington, Resources for the Future.
24.
NaessArne1986 “Intrinsic Value: Will the Defenders of Nature Please Rise”, in Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, edited by SouléMichael E., pp. 504–15. Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates, Inc.
25.
NaessArne1989Ecology, Community and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy, translated and revised by RothenbergDavid. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
26.
PearceD., BarbierE., and MarkandyaA.1988Sustainable Development and Cost-Benefit Analysis.London, London Environmental Economics Center (LEEC).
27.
PearceD., BarbierE., and MarkandyaA.1990Sustainable Development: Economics and Environment in the Third World.London, Earthscan Publications, Ltd.
28.
PearceD.1988 “Economics, Equity, and Sustainable Development”, Futures20: 598–605.
29.
PearceD.1989a Sustainable Development: an Economic Perspective.International Institute for Environment and Development. London, London Environmental Economics Center (LEEC).
30.
PearceDavid W. and TurnerR. Kerry1990Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment.Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.
PearceDavid, MarkandyaAnil, and BarbierEdward B1989b Blueprint for a Green Economy, prepared for the UK Department of the Environment. London, Earthscan Publications Ltd.
33.
PlattJ.1973 “Social Traps”, American Psychologist28: 641–51.
34.
SagoffMark1988The Economy of the Earth.New York, Cambridge University Press.
35.
TurnerR. Kerry1992 “Speculations on Weak and Strong Sustainability” Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), Working Paper GEC 92–26.
36.
TurnerR. K. and PearceD. W.1993 (forthcoming) “Sustainable Economic Development: Economic and Ethical Principles”, in Economics and Ecology: New Frontiers and Sustainable Development, edited by BarbierE. B., Chapman and Hall.
37.
World Commission on Environment and Development1987Our Common Future:Oxford, Oxford University Press.
