In 1972 a public choice model predicted that the incipient environmental movement in the United States would grow but encounter overwhelming industrial opposition. Twenty years later we find the model overstated this opposition. Environmental pressure groups were able to pass substantial legislation, resist counter forces, and reduce most targeted pollutants. A revised public choice model predicts that the success of the present global environmental movement depends on (1) information flows between scientists and the public on the potential costs of deterioration, and (2) means for reducing the costs of regulation such as relying more on market incentives.
CostanzaRobert (editor) 1991Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. New York, Columbia University Press.
9.
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) (various years), Environmental Quality: Annual Reports of the Council on Environmental Quality. Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.
10.
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)1989Environmental Trends. Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.
11.
DisingerJohn F., SchoenfeldClay, and HoweRobert1988 “Recent Developments in College Level Environmental Studies Courses and Programs”. Washington DC, ERIC (Educational Resource Information Center).
12.
DownsAnthony1957 “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy”, Journal of Political Economy65(April): 135–50.
13.
DownsAnthony1972 “Up and down with Ecology – The Issue-Attention Cycle”, The Public Interest28: 38–50.
EverettMichael D.1972 “The Role of Formal Education in Environmental Movements”, Journal of Economic Issues6: 87–95.
16.
ErskineHazel1972 “The Polls: Pollution and Its Costs”, Public Opinion Quarterly26: 120–35.
17.
Gallup Poll Report1982 (Nov) 14.
18.
GillroyJohn M. and ShapiroRobert Y.1986 “The Polls: Environmental Protection”, Public Opinion Quarterly50 (Summer): 270–9.
19.
HardinRussell1982Collective Action.Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future.
20.
HousePeter W. and ShullRoger D.1985Regulatory Reform: Politics and the Environment. Lanham, MD, University Press of America.
21.
HueberGraham1991 “Americans Report High Levels of Environmental Concern, Activity”, The Gallup Poll Monthly, No. 307, 6–12.
22.
KapplerFrederic G. and RutledgeGary L.1982 “Stock of Plant and Equipment for Air and Water Pollution Abatement in the United States, 1960–81”, Survey of Current Business, (Nov.) 18–25.
23.
MargolisHoward1982Selfishness. Altruism, and Rationality: A Theory of Social Choice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
24.
McLeanIain1987Public Choice: An Introduction. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
25.
MeadowsDennis L., MeadowsDonella H., and RandersJorgen1992Beyond the Limits. Post Mills, Vermont, Chelsea Green.
26.
MitchellRobert Cameron1979 “National Environmental Lobbies and the Apparent Illogic of Collective Action”, in Collective Decision Making: Applications from Public Choice Theory, edited by RussellClifford S., pp. 87–121. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future.
27.
MurchArvin W.1971 “Public Concern for Environmental Pollution”, Public Opinion Quarterly25: 99–108.
28.
MuellerDennis C.1979Public Choice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
29.
OlsonMancur1965The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press.
30.
RieselbachLeroy N.1986Congressional Reform. Washington, DC, Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
31.
SchoenfeldClay and DisingerJohn (editors) 1978 “Environmental Education in Action Case Studies of Environmental Studies Programs in Colleges and Universities Today”, ERIC.
32.
StiglerGeorge J.1961 “The Economics of Information”, Journal of Political Economy, 69: 213–25.
33.
TullockGordon1967Toward a Mathematics of Politics.Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
34.
VietorRichard H. K.1980Environmental Politics and the Coal Coalition. College Station, Texas A&M University Press.
35.
WennerLettie M.1982The Environmental Decade in the Court. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
