Strategic posthumanism: Confronting the fear of anthropomorphism,and finding brains in rivers

Abstract

In recent climate philosophy debates, concepts of more-than-human agency and flat ontologies have faced critical scrutiny, particularly by eco-Marxist scholars. With the rise of philosophical theories such as new materialism and posthumanism, some scholars argue that this turn towards nonhuman agency risks obscuring the distinctly anthropogenic origin of the ongoing ecological crises. Yet, prevailing critiques often neglect to engage substantively with Indigenous epistemologies, despite their growing prominence and normative authority within global climate discourses. Rather, the criticism is directed at what it perceives as anthropomorphic projections and fantastical notions – rivers endowed with minds or stones imbued with desire.

This article challenges the dismissal of anthropomorphism by arguing that climate philosophers would benefit from deeper engagement with Indigenous perspectives, which offer vital insights into the ethical and ontological dimensions of nonhuman agency. It argues that the conventional use of ‘anthropomorphism’ as a pejorative obscures the historically contingent and culturally embedded boundaries between humans and nature. By tracing the entangled histories of ridicule surrounding anthropomorphic attribution alongside the systemic dehumanization of Indigenous peoples, this study elucidates how both discourses contribute to the othering of nature and the racialized naturalization of Indigenous others. But to fully recognize these interconnections, we need to disentangle the problematic history of anthropomorphism and the accusation that it presents towards Indigenous ontologies.

The article identifies key points of contention concerning the validity, utility and strategic value of extending agency beyond the human. Attending to relational ontologies prevalent in Indigenous scholarship reveals the risk that dismissing nonhuman agency may perpetuate epistemic injustices against Indigenous peoples. To navigate these complexities, the article proposes the concept of strategic posthumanism – a theoretical orientation that brings divergent approaches together by fostering a decentering of the human subject without erasing historically grounded political and ethical responsibilities.

Keywords

Indigenous knowledge posthumanism anthropocentrism nonhuman agency epistemic injustice anthropomorphism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agrawal

(1995) Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change 26(3): 413–439.

Alcoff

(2017) Philosophy and philosophical practice: Eurocentrism as an epistemology of ignorance. In: Kidd

Medina

Pohlhaus

(eds) The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. London: Routledge, 397–408.

Anderson

(2004) Creatures of Empire: How Domestic Animals Transformed Early America. New York: Oxford University Press.

Barca

(2020) Forces of Reproduction: Notes for a Counter-Hegemonic Anthropocene. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Boyle

(1686/1996) A Free Enquiry into the Vulgarly Received Notion of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Braidotti

(2019a) Posthuman Knowledge. Newark: Polity Press.

Braidotti

(2019b) A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society 36(6): 31–61.

Braidotti

(2022) Posthuman Feminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Chandler

Reid

(2019) Becoming Indigenous. Governing Imaginaries in the Anthropocene. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

10.

Charbonnier

Salmon

Skafish

(2017) Comparative Metaphysics: Ontology after Anthropology. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

11.

Clifford

(2013) Returns: Becoming Indigenous in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

12.

Daston

(1995) How nature became the other: Anthropomorphism and anthropocentrism in early modern natural philosophy. In: Maasen

Mendelsohn

Weingart

(eds) Biology as Society, Society as Biology: Metaphors. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 37–56.

13.

Daston

(2019) Against Nature. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

14.

Daston

Park

(1998) Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. New York: Zone Books.

15.

David

Todd

(2017) On the importance of a date, or, decolonizing the anthropocene. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 16(4): 761–780.

16.

Ehrenreich

(2020) Desert Notebooks: A Roadmap for the End of Time. Berkeley: Counterpoint Press.

17.

Ferrando

(2020) Philosophical Posthumanism. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Inc.

18.

Feyerabend

(1975/1993) Against Method, 3rd ed. London: Verso.

19.

Feyerabend

(1987) Farewell to Reason. London: Verso.

20.

Ghosh

(2021) The Nutmeg’s Curse: Parables For a Planet in Crisis. London: The University of Chicago Press.

21.

Glacken

(1976) Traces on the Rhodian Shore: Nature and Culture in Western Thought from Ancient Times to the End of the Eighteenth Century. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

22.

Hamilton

(2017) Defiant Earth. The Fate of Humans in the Anthropocene. Cambridge: Polity.

23.

Haraway

(2016) Staying With the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.

24.

Hernandez

(2022) Fresh Banana Leaves: Healing Indigenous Landscapes Through Indigenous Science. Huichin, unceded Ohlone land / Berkeley, California: North Atlantic Books.

25.

Holbraad

Pedersen

(2017) The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

26.

Hornborg

(2017) Artifacts have consequences, not agency: Toward a critical theory of global environmental history. European Journal of Social Theory 20(1): 95–110.

27.

Hornborg

(2019) Nature, Society, and Justice in the Anthropocene: Unravelling the Money-Energy-Technology Complex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

28.

Hunt

(2014) Ontologies of indigeneity: The politics of embodying a concept. Cultural Geographies 21(1): 27–34.

29.

Kain

(2018) The spirits are leaving: Adaptation and the indigenous peoples of the Caribbean coast of Nicaragua. In: Nahashima

Krupnik

Rubis

(eds) Indigenous Knowledge for Climate Change Assessment. New York: Cambridge University Press, 188–197.

30.

Kimmerer

(2013/2020) Braiding Sweetgrass. Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants. London: Penguin Books.

31.

Kopenawa

Albert

(2013) The Falling Sky: Words of a Yanomami Shaman. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

32.

Krawec

(2022) Becoming Kin: An Indigenous Call to Unforgetting the Past and Reimagining our Future. Minneapolis: Broadleaf Books.

33.

Krenak

(2022) Ideas to Postpone the End of the World. Toronto: Anansi International.

34.

Larsen

RKE

(2023) The nature of the posthuman: Rosi Braidotti and the resurrection of ecofeminism. L'Homme. Europäische Zeitschrift für Feministische Geschichtswissenschaft 34(2): 139–146.

35.

Larsen

RKE

(2025) The contested history of the ecological Indian trope: Politics of conservation science and anthropology 1990-2000. Environment and History (Ahead-of-print).

36.

Latour

(1994) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

37.

Leduc

(2015) Sila dialogues on climate change: Inuit wisdom for a cross-cultural interdisciplinarity. In: Hulme

(ed) Cultures of Climate Knowledge. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 237–250.

38.

le Guin

(2017) Deep in admiration. In: Tsing

Swanson

Gan

Bubandt

(eds) Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, M15–M21.

39.

Liboiron

(2021) Pollution is Colonialism. Durham: Duke University Press.

40.

Malm

(2018) The Progress of this Storm: Nature and Society in a Warming World. New York: Verso.

41.

Murray

(2010) The power of the past: Environment, aborigines, archaeology, and a sustainable Australian society. In: McAnany

Yoffee

(eds) Questioning Collapse: Human Resilience, Ecological Vulnerability, and the Aftermath of Empire. New York: Cambridge University Press, 299–328.

42.

Panduro

(2018) Peasants of the Amazonian-Andes and their conversations with climate change in the san Martín region. In: Nahashima

Krupnik

Rubis

(eds) Indigenous Knowledge for Climate Change Assessment. New York: Cambridge University Press, 254–264.

43.

Porter

(1991) History of the body. In: Burke

(ed) New Perspectives on Historical Writing, 1st ed. Cambridge: Polity Press, 206–232.

44.

Saito

(2023) Marx in the Anthropocene: Towards the Idea of Degrowth Communism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

45.

Shapin

(2018) The Scientific Revolution, 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

46.

Skiveren

(2023) New materialism and the eco-marxist challenge: Ontological shadowboxing in the environmental humanities. Environmental Humanities 15(3): 181–194.

47.

Smith

(1999/2021) Decolonizing Methodologies. Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

48.

Soper

(1995) What Is Nature? Culture, Politics, and the Non-Human. Oxford: Blackwell.

49.

Soper

(2012) The humanism in posthumanism. Comparative Critical Studies 9(3): 365–378.

50.

Soper

(2020) Post-Growth Living: For an Alternative Hedonism. London: Verso Books.

51.

Spivak

(1984) Criticism, feminism and the institution. Interview by Elizabeth Grosz. Thesis Eleven 10/11.

52.

Spivak

Rooney

(1989) In a Word. Interview. Differences 1(2): 124–156. doi:10.1215/10407391-1-2-124

53.

Sundberg

(2014) Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies 21(1): 15–33.

54.

TallBear

(2015) An indigenous reflection on working beyond the human/not human. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 21(2-3): 230–235.

55.

Teves

(2020) Indigeneity and performance. In: Hokowhitu

Moreton-Robinson

Tuhiwai-Smith

Andersen

Larkin

(eds) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Indigenous Studies. London: Routledge, 479–487.

56.

Todd

(2016) An indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: ‘ontology’ is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology 29(1): 4–22.

57.

Tsing

(2012) Unruly edges: Mushrooms as companion Species. Environmental Humanities 1: 141–154.

58.

Tsosie

(2017) Indigenous peoples, anthropology, and the legacy of epistemic injustice. In: Kidd

Medina

Pohlhaus

(eds) The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. London: Routledge, 356–369.

59.

Watts

(2013) Indigenous place-thought & agency amongst humans and non-humans (first woman and sky woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 2(1): 20–34.

60.

Whyte

(2017) Indigenous climate change studies. Indigenizing futures, decolonizing the anthropocene. English Language Notes 55(1-2): 153–162.