The end of nature problem can be framed as a dilemma: either all human intentional actions are natural or they are all unnatural and destroy nature as an effect. Given the scope of human influence, the latter entails that there is no nature left on Earth. Therefore, the environmentalist project of protecting nature is either unnecessary or futile. Prevailing attempts to forge a middle path – by, for example, distinguishing natural from unnatural human activities – struggle to find metaphysical grounding. I argue that the biological concept of human proper functioning can ground the relevant distinction between natural and unnatural human activities. Only unnatural activities can destroy nature; specifically, those activities that trace back to beliefs about value that diverge from the human lifeform.
AngermeierPL (2000) The natural imperative for biological conservation. Conservation Biology14(2): 373–381.
2.
BrennanA (1988) Thinking about nature: An investigation of nature, value and ecology. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
3.
BrennerSLJonesJPRutanen-WhaleyRH, et al. (2015) Evolutionary mismatch and chronic psychological stress. Journal of Evolutionary Medicine3: 1–11.
4.
BuchananAPowellR (2018) The evolution of moral progress: A biocultural theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
CallicottJB (1991) The wilderness idea revisited: The sustainable development alternative. Environmental Professional13: 235–247.
6.
ChaudharyNSalaliGD (2022) Hunter-gatherers, mismatch and mental disorder. In: AbedRSt John-SmithP (eds) Evolutionary Psychiatry: Current Perspectives on Evolution and Mental Health. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 64–83.
7.
DeckersJ (2021) On (un)naturalness. Environmental Values30(3): 297–318.
8.
Deplazes-ZempA (2022) Are people part of nature? Yes and no: A perspectival account of the concept of ‘nature’. Environmental Ethics44(2): 99–119.
9.
d'ErricoFStringerCB (2011) Evolution, revolution or saltation scenario for the emergence of modern cultures?Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences366: 1060–1069.
10.
DussaultA (2016) Ecological nature: A non-dualistic concept for rethinking humankind's place in the world. Ethics and the Environment21(1): 1–37.
11.
ElliottR (1997) Faking nature: The ethics of environmental restoration. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
12.
FitzpatrickSAndrewsK (2022) Animal culture and animal welfare. Philosophy of Science89(5): 1104–1113.
13.
FoxM (2022) Alzheimer’s disease as a disease of evolutionary mismatch, with a focus on reproductive life history. In: AbedRSt John-SmithP (eds) Evolutionary Psychiatry: Current Perspectives on Evolution and Mental Health. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 260–275.
14.
GouldJMargolisELaurenceS (2007) Animal Artifacts. In: Creations of the mind: theories of artifacts and their representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 249–266.
15.
Hahn-HolbrookJHaseltonM (2014) Is postpartum depression a disease of modern civilization?. Current Directions in Psychological Science23(6): 395–400.
16.
HayekF (1979) Three sources of human values. In: Epilogue to Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. IIIOxford: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 153–176.
17.
HeersminkR (2022) Human uniqueness in using tools and artifacts: Flexibility, variety, complexity. Synthese200(6): 1–22.
18.
HockettC (1960) Logical considerations in the study of animal communication. In: LanyonWTavolgaW (eds) Animal sounds and communication. Washington, DC: American Institute of Biological Sciences, 392–430.
19.
HorkheimerMAdornoTW (2002) JephcottEFN (eds)Schmid NoerrG (eds)Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
KaebnickGE (2013) Humans in nature: The world as we find it and the world as we create it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
KatzE (1997) Nature as subject: Human obligation and natural community. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
22.
KatzE (2002) Understanding moral limits in the duality of artifacts and nature: A reply to critics. Ethics and the Environment7(1): 138–146.
23.
KeelingPM (2008) Does the idea of wilderness need a defense?Environmental Values17(4): 505–519.
24.
KellyR (1995) The foraging spectrum. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
25.
MatthewsonJGriffithsPE (2017) Biological criteria of disease: Four ways of going wrong. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy42: 447–466.
26.
McKibbenB (1989) The end of nature. New York: Anchor Books.
27.
MillJS (1884) On Nature. In: Three essays on religion. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 3–68.
28.
NietzscheF. (1966). Beyond good and evil. (Trans., KaufmannW. (ed)). New York: Vintage Books.
29.
ParkerGDuranteKMHillSE, et al. (2022) Why women choose divorce: An evolutionary perspective. Current Opinions in Psychology43: 300–306.
30.
PerssonISavulescuJ (2014) Unfit for the future: The need for moral enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
RousseauJ (2019) GourevitchV (ed) Rousseau: the discourses and other early political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
SapolskyRMShareLJ (2004) A Pacific Culture among Wild Baboons: Its emergence and transmission. PLoS Biology2(4): 1–8.
34.
ScovilleJM (2023) On the concept of independent nature. Environmental Philosophy20(2): 237–265.
35.
SiipiH (2008) Dimensions of naturalness. Ethics and the Environment13(1): 71–103.
36.
SpinozaB (2006) The essential Spinoza: Ethics and related writings. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
37.
The Wilderness Act (1964) 78 Stat. 890 – An Act to establish a National Wilderness Preservation System for the permanent good of the whole people, and for other purposes
38.
ThompsonM (2008) Life and action: Elementary structures of practice and practical thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
TomaselloM (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Van VugtMColarelliSMLiNP (2024) Digitally connected, evolutionarily wired: An evolutionary mismatch perspective on digital work. Organizational Psychology Review14(3): 403–424.
41.
VogelS (2002) Environmental philosophy after the end of nature. Environmental Ethics24(1): 23–39.
42.
VogelS (2015) Thinking like a mall: Environmental philosophy after the end of nature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
43.
WalshD (2008) Teleology. In: RuseM (ed) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology. Oxford, UK: Oxford, 113–137.
44.
WilssonL (1968) My beaver colony. New York: Doubleday Books.
45.
WittC (2015) In defense of the craft analogy: Artifacts and natural teleology. In: LeunissenM (eds) Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 107–120.
