Environmental philosophy – broadly conceived as using philosophical tools to develop ideas related to environmental issues – is conducted and practised in highly diverse ways in different contexts and traditions in Asia. ‘Asian environmental philosophy’ can be understood to include Asian traditions of thought as well as grassroots perspectives on environmental issues in Asia. Environmental issues have sensitive political facets tied to who has the legitimacy to decide about how natural resources are used. Because of this, the works, practices, and researchers in Asian environmental philosophy are exposed to being (mis)used by diverse stakeholders and actors to support political ends not related to environmental sustainability. Two processes are at play at the nexus of the construction of identities in relation to conceptualisations of nature: eco-orientalism and ecological nationalisms. This paper analyzes and exemplifies these dynamics through a conceptual framework that distinguishes ideological and socio-technical explanations of environmental degradation. Finally, to minimise the risks of political misuse, five pathways are presented to carefully help curate environmental, philosophical statements: contextualise, quantify uncertainty and ‘uniqueness’, downscale, confront claims with local realities and literature, and collaborate with researchers from other disciplines. Conjointly, these pathways aim at favouring intercultural collaboration while valuing diversity, thus supporting the development and exchanges in environmental philosophy in Asia and beyond.
AdamsWMulliganM (2002) Decolonizing Nature: Strategies for Conservation in a Post-colonial Era. London: Routledge.
2.
Amorim-MaiaATAnguelovskiIChuE, et al. (2022) Intersectional climate justice: A conceptual pathway for bridging adaptation planning, transformative action, and social equity. Urban Climate41: 101053.
3.
ArisM (1990) Man and nature in the Buddhist Himalayas. In: RustomjiNKRambleC (eds) Himalayan Environment and Culture. New Delhi: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
4.
BergthallerH (2020) Thoughts on Asia and the anthropocene. In: The Anthropocenic Turn. England: Routledge.
BrugnachMCrapsMDewulfA (2017) Including indigenous peoples in climate change mitigation: Addressing issues of scale, knowledge and power. Climatic Change140(1): 19–32.
BruunO (2003) Fengshui and the Chinese perception of nature. In: FoltzRC (ed) Worldviews, Religion and the Environment. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 236–245.
10.
BruunOKallandA (1995) Asian Perceptions of Nature: A Critical Approach. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon.
11.
BushT (2022) Eco-Orientalism: Power discourses on Isle de Jean Charles. ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment29(2): 248–259.
12.
CaneyS (2005) Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global climate change. Leiden Journal of International Law18(4): 747–775.
13.
CarbadoDWCrenshawKWMaysVM, et al. (2013) Intersectionality: Mapping the movements of a theory. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race10(2): 303–312.
14.
CastroEV (2015) Who is afraid of the ontological wolf?: Some comments on an ongoing anthropological debate. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology33(1): 2–17.
15.
CederlofGSivaramakrishnanK (2014) Ecological Nationalisms: Nature, Livelihoods, and Identities in South Asia. Seattle London: University of Washington Press.
16.
ChakrabortySChakrabortyA (2017) Satoyama landscapes and their change in a river basin context: Lessons for sustainability. Issues in Social Science5(1): 38.
17.
ChakrounL (2019) Paul B. Thompson and Kirill O. Thompson (eds), Agricultural ethics in East Asian perspective: A transpacific dialogue. Environmental Values28(5): 627–629.
18.
ChakrounLDrozL (2020) Sustainability through landscapes: Natural parks, Satoyama, and permaculture in Japan. Ecosystems and People16(1): 369–383.
19.
Chaloping-MarchM (2014) The mining policy of the Philippines and “resource nationalism” towards nation-building. Journal de la Société des Océanistes138(138–139): 93–106.
ChenK-H (2010) Asia as Method: Toward Deimperialization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
22.
ChildsJ (2016) Geography and resource nationalism: A critical review and reframing. The Extractive Industries and Society3(2): 539–546.
23.
ColavitoMMTrainorSFKettleNP, et al. (2019) Making the transition from science delivery to knowledge coproduction in boundary spanning: A case study of the Alaska Fire Science Consortium. Weather, Climate, and Society11(4): 917–934.
24.
CrenshawK (1991) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review43(6): 1241–1299.
de JongLDe BruinSKnoopJ, et al. (2021) Understanding land-use change conflict: A systematic review of case studies. Journal of Land Use Science16(3): 223–239.
27.
Di FabioARosenMA (2020) An exploratory study of a new psychological instrument for evaluating sustainability: The sustainable development goals psychological inventory. Sustainability12(18): 7617.
28.
DomínguezLLuomaC (2020) Decolonising conservation policy: How colonial land and conservation ideologies persist and perpetuate indigenous injustices at the expense of the environment. Land9(3): 65.
29.
DoveMRCamposMTMathewsAS, et al. (2003) The global mobilization of environmental concepts: Re-thinking the western/non-western divide. In: SelinH (ed) Nature Across Cultures: Views of Nature and the Environment in Non-Western Cultures. Science Across Cultures: The History of Non-Western Science. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0149-5_2.
30.
DrozL (2020) Environmental individual responsibility for accumulated consequences. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics33(1): 111–125.
31.
DrozL (2022) Anthropocentrism as the scapegoat of the environmental crisis: A review. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics22: 25–49.
32.
DrozL (2023) Eco-dogmatism: Nature’s values and rights in high-level environmental governance initiatives. The International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice19(1): 1–27.
33.
DrozLBrugnachMPascualU (2023) Multilingualism for pluralising knowledge and decision making about people and nature relationships. People and Nature5(3): 874–884.
34.
DrozLChenH-MChuH-T, et al. (2022) Exploring the diversity of conceptualizations of nature in East and South-East Asia. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications9(1): 1–12.
35.
Elaine MuirheadVMilnerAFreemanR, et al. (2020) What is intersectionality and why is it important in oral health research?Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology48(6): 464–470.
36.
GabrielSPWilsonB (2021) Orientalism and Reverse Orientalism in Literature and Film: Beyond East and West, 1st edition Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
GaffricGHeurtebiseJ-Y (2013) L’écologie, Confucius et la démocratie. Ecologie Politique47(2): 51–61.
38.
GoldmanL (2022) Climate Change and Youth: Turning Grief and Anxiety into Activism. Taylor & Francis.
39.
HakkarainenVAndersonCBErikssonM, et al. (2020) Grounding IPBES experts’ views on the multiple values of nature in epistemology, knowledge and collaborative science. Environmental Science & Policy105: 11–18.
40.
HanF (2006) The Chinese View of Nature : Tourism in China’s Scenic and Historic Interest Areas. PhD. Queensland University of Technology. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/16480/ (accessed 16 March 2022).
41.
HeurtebiseJ-Y (2017) Sustainability and ecological civilization in the age of anthropocene: An epistemological analysis of the psychosocial and “culturalist” interpretations of global environmental risks. Sustainability9(8): 1331.
HoeppeG (2014) Knowledge against the state: Local perceptions of government interventions in Teh fishery (Kerala, India). In: Ecological Nationalisms: Nature, Livelihoods, and Identities in South Asia, Reprint edition. Seattle London: University of Washington Press, 233–254.
44.
HoffmannC (2018) Environmental determinism as orientalism: The geo-political ecology of crisis in the Middle East. Journal of Historical Sociology31(1): 94–104.
45.
HoldenW (2022) Climate change, neoauthoritarianism, necropolitics, and state failure: The Duterte regime in the Philippines. Asian Geographer40(1): 1–23.
46.
HolmgrenD (2004) Permaculture in Japan: Foreign Idea or Indigenous Design?(ed. null). null.
47.
JasanoffS (2004) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. England: Routledge.
48.
JenksABObringerKM (2020) The poverty of plastics bans: Environmentalism’s win is a loss for disabled people. Critical Social Policy40(1): 151–161.
49.
KałwakWWeihgoldV (2022) The relationality of ecological emotions: An interdisciplinary critique of individual resilience as psychology’s response to the climate crisis. Frontiers in Psychology13. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.823620
50.
KarlssonB (2014) Indigenous natures: Forest and community dynamics in Meghalaya, North-East India. In: Ecological Nationalisms: Nature, Livelihoods, and Identities in South Asia, Reprint edition. Seattle London: University of Washington Press, 170–198.
51.
KeneipfenuoA (2018) Copious amidst Chaos. A Tribal Postcolonial Feminist God-Talk from Northeast Indian Perspective. Nijmegen: Ipskamp Printing Nijmegen. [S.l.] : [S.n.]. Epub ahead of print 2018.
52.
KidnerDW (2014) Why ‘anthropocentrism’ is not anthropocentric. Dialectical Anthropology38(4): 465–480.
53.
KleinN (2015) This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. London: Penguin.
54.
KlütschCFCFerreiraCC (2021) Closing the gap between knowledge and implementation in conservation science: Concluding remarks. In: FerreiraCCKlütschCFC (eds) Closing the Knowledge-Implementation Gap in Conservation Science: Interdisciplinary Evidence Transfer Across Sectors and Spatiotemporal Scales. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 457–473.
55.
KureethadamJI (2017) The Philosophical Roots of the Ecological Crisis: Descartes and the Modern Worldview. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.
56.
LarsonGJ (1987) ‘Conceptual resources’ in South Asia for ‘environmental ethics’ or the fly is still alive and well in the bottle. Philosophy East and West37(2): 150–159.
57.
MarananDS (2022) The Value of the Arts and Humanities to Science Outcomes in the Philippines: A report to the British Council on The Creative Turn in the Sciences project. Epub ahead of print 2022.
58.
MarksEHickmanCPihkalaP, et al. (2021) Young People’s Voices on Climate Anxiety, Government Betrayal and Moral Injury: A Global Phenomenon. ID 3918955, SSRN Scholarly Paper, 7 September. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3918955 (accessed 17 January 2022).
59.
MignoloWDWalshCE (2018) On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. In: On Decoloniality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
60.
MitraRBuzzanellP (2016) Communicative tensions of meaningful work: The case of sustainability practitioners. Human Relations70.
MorrisonDEDunlapRE (1986) Environmentalism and elitism: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Environmental Management10(5): 581–589.
63.
MuradianRGómez-BaggethunE (2021) Beyond ecosystem services and nature’s contributions: Is it time to leave utilitarian environmentalism behind?Ecological Economics185: 107038.
64.
MurasawaM (2020) Satoyama studies: Socio-ecological considerations on cultural nature. ユニオンプレス.
65.
MurasawaM (2023) Biodiversity issues and changes in academic views of nature: Toward the next generation of Satoyama research (in Japanese). Ryukoku Journal of Peace and Sustainability: 87–96.
66.
NguyenCT (2020) Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles. Episteme17(2): 141–161.
67.
NovellinoD (2003) From seduction to miscommunication: The confession and presentation of local knowledge in “participatory development”. In: Negotiating Local Knowledge: Power and Identity in Development, Illustrated版. London ; Sterling, VA: Pluto Press.
68.
OhsawaY (2019) The effect of the hybridity between eastern and western cultures in Japanese animations -from a post-colonial perspective. The Bulletin of the Graduate School of Josai International University27(6): 33–47.
69.
OjalaMCunsoloAOgunbodeC, et al. (2021) Anxiety, worry, and grief in a time of environmental and climate crisis: A narrative review. Annual Review of Environment and Resources: 35–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-022716
70.
OkoyeC (2012) Religion and the management of environmental problems in the ‘evolved African’ system. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science3: 38–46.
71.
OwusuMNursey-BrayMRuddD (2019) Gendered perception and vulnerability to climate change in urban slum communities in Accra, Ghana. Regional Environmental Change19(1): 13–25.
72.
ParkesG (1997) Voices of mountains, trees, and rivers: Kūkai, Dōgen, and a deeper ecology. In: Buddhism and Ecology: The Interconnection of Dharma and Deeds. Cambridge: International Society for Science and Religion, 111–128.
PierottiR (2010) Indigenous Knowledge, Ecology, and Evolutionary Biology. New York: Routledge.
75.
PoseyD (1998) Diachronic ecotones and anthropogenic landscapes in Amazonia, contesting the consciousness of conservation. In: Advances in Historical Ecology. Columbia University Press, 104–118.
76.
PoseyDA (2004) Indigenous Knowledge and Ethics: A Darrell Posey Reader. Psychology Press.
77.
PowersJT (2021) Ancient Wisdom, Modern Hope: Relearning Environmental Connectiveness. Alresford, Hampshire ; Washington, USA: Moon Books.
78.
RanderiaS (2007) Global designs and local lifeworlds. Interventions9(1): 12–30.
79.
RanjbaranFMarrasC (2011) European peer review guide: Integrating policies and practices into coherent procedures. Epub ahead of print 2011.
80.
RolstonH (1987) Can the east help the west to value nature?Philosophy East and West37(2): 172–190.
81.
RupprechtCDDVervoortJBerthelsenC, et al. (2020) Multispecies sustainability. Global Sustainability3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.28
82.
SaidEW (1979) Orientalism: Edward W. Said. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
Satha-AnandC (2018) Romancing extremism?: Understanding the violent turn in struggles for rights, responsibility and justice. Plenary presentation at the World Congress of Philosophy, August 17th 2018, Beijing.Epub ahead of print 2018.
85.
ScopellitiMMolinarioEBonaiutoF, et al. (2018) What makes you a ‘hero’ for nature? Socio-psychological profiling of leaders committed to nature and biodiversity protection across seven EU countries. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management61(5–6): 970–993.
86.
SeversEJongS (2018) Preferable minority representatives: Brokerage and betrayal. PS: Political Science & Politics51(2): 345–350.
87.
SihombingHH (2023) The Batak-Christian theology of land: Towards a postcolonial comparative theology. CrossCurrents73(1): 42–63.
88.
SmithLT (2012) Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples, 2nd edition. London: Zed Books.
89.
Southwold LlewellynS (2014) Forest management in a Pukhtun community. In: Ecological Nationalisms: Nature, Livelihoods, and Identities in South Asia, Reprint edition. Seattle London: University of Washington Press.
90.
SouyriP-F (2016) Moderne sans être occidental: Aux origines du Japon aujourd’hui. Paris: Gallimard.
91.
SteigerwaldERamírez-CastañedaVBrandtD, et al. (2022) Overcoming language barriers in academia: Machine translation tools and a vision for a multilingual future.
92.
StrangV (2005) Knowing me, knowing you: Aboriginal and European concepts of nature as self and other. Worldviews9(1): 25–56.
ThompsonPBThompsonKO (2018) Agricultural Ethics in East Asian Perspective: A Transpacific Dialogue, 1st ed. 2018版 New York, NY: Springer.
97.
ThompsonT (2021) Young people’s climate anxiety revealed in landmark survey. Nature597(7878): 605–605.
98.
WalterSBrüggemannMEngesserS (2017) Echo chambers of denial: Explaining user comments on climate change view. Environmental Communication A Journal of Nature and Culture12(2): 204–217.
WhiteL (1967) The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science155(3767): 1203–1207.
101.
WilliamsHTPMcMurrayJRKurzT, et al. (2015) Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Global Environmental Change32: 126–138.
102.
XhauflairHJago-onSVitalesTJ, et al. (2023) The invisible plant technology of prehistoric Southeast Asia: Indirect evidence for basket and rope making at Tabon cave, Philippines, 39–33,000 years ago. PLOS ONE18(6): e0281415.
