This article addresses the question raised by the Anthropocene of rethinking the concept of autonomy which, in the conditions of the new geological epoch, is subject to a crisis of legitimation. It explores the ‘strong hypothesis’ according to which nature is a necessary condition of our qualitative experience of the world and a constitutive relation of autonomy defined as the self-realisation of individual identity. With this aim in mind, the article attempts to rethink the concept of recognition in order to conceive a recognising attitude of nature in the form of love of nature as a form of adequate recognition. Rethinking recognition can serve as foundation of an ‘objective’ theory of autonomy, that is, a theory that explains how nature can be defined as a condition and constitutive relation of autonomy. The article, therefore, proposes to reformulate the concept of autonomy as the self-realisation of an ecological or environmental identity in the form of the self-realisation of an ecological ethos, that is, an attitude of respect and care for nature. This enquiry, ultimately, is a contribution to the task of rethinking the basis of our conceptions of autonomy and freedom in the Anthropocene, so that the idea of autonomy can legitimately constitute the central value of the social transformation that is needed to face the ecological crisis.
ButtD (2017) Law, Governance, and the ecological ethos. In: GardinerSMThompsonA (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics. Oxford Handbooks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp.51–61.
2.
CarlehedenMSchultzN (2022) The ideal of freedom in the anthropocene: A new crisis of legitimation and the brutalization of geo-social conflicts. Thesis Eleven170(1): 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136221104293.
ClaytonS (2003) Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In: ClaytonSOpotowS (eds) Identity and the Natural Environment, The Psychological Significance of Nature. Cambridge, MA, London, UK: The MIT Press.
5.
FrankfurtHG (1999) Necessity, Volition, and Love. Necessity, Volition, & Love. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
FrankfurtHG (2004) The Reasons of Love. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
FurtakRA (2019) On the love of nature. In: AdreinneM (ed) The Routledge Handbook of Love in Philosophy. Martin: Routledge, pp.205–214.
8.
HallC (2019) Caring to be green, the importance of love for environmental integrity. In: MartinAM (ed) The Routledge Handbook of Love in Philosophy. New York and London: Routledge, pp.215–226.
9.
HamiltonCBonneuilCGemenneF (2015) The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis : Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch. Routledge Environmental Humanities.Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
10.
HessG (2013) Ethiques de La Nature. Ethique et Philosophie Morale. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
11.
HonnethA (1996) The Struggle for Recognition : The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Translated by Joel Anderson. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
HonnethA (2001, October 5 and 8) La théorie critique de l'École de Francfort et la théorie de la reconnaissance. (O. Voirol, Interviewer, O. Voirol, Editor, & O. Voirol, Translator)Paris: La Découverte, pp.151–180.
13.
HonnethA (2007a) Decentered Autonomy: The Subject After the Fall. In: HonnethA (ed) Disrespect, The Normative Foundations of Critical theory.Cambridge UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
14.
HonnethA (2007b) Recognition as ideology. In Van Den BrinkBOwenD (eds) Recognition and Power.Cambridge University Press, pp.323–347.
15.
HonnethA (2008) Reification: A New Look at an Old Ideawith Judith Butler, Raymond Geuss, & Jonathan Lear. Edited by Martin Jay. The Berkeley Tanner Lectures. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
JouanM (2009) Comment Penser l’Autonomie : Entre Compétences et Dépendances. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
19.
KahnPHJr (2002) Children’s affiliations with nature: Structure, development, and the problem of environmental generational amnesia. In: KahnPHKellertSR (eds) Children and Nature Psychological, Sociocultural, and Evolutionary Investigations. Cambridge, MA, London, UK: The MIT Press, pp.93–116.
20.
KellertSR (2002) Experiencing nature: affective, cognitive, and evaluative development in children. In: KahnPHJrKellertSR (eds) Children and Nature Psychological, Sociocultural, and Evolutionary Investigations. Cambridge, MA, London, UK: The MIT Press, pp.117–151.
21.
KellertSRWilsonEO (1993) The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
KollerS (2021) Towards degrowth? Making peace with mortality to reconnect with (One’s) nature: An ecopsychological proposition for a paradigm shift. Environmental Values30(3): 345–366. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327120X15916910310590.
24.
LaitinenA (2010) On the scope of ‘recognition’: The role of adequate regard and mutuality. In: Schmidt amH-CZurnCF (eds) The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books, pp.319–342.
25.
MackenzieCStoljarN (eds.) (2000) Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Automony, Agency, and the Social Self. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
MarisV (2018) La Part Sauvage Du Monde : Penser La Nature Dans l’Anthropocène, Anthropocène SeuilParis: Éditions du Seuil.
27.
MaturanaHVerden-ZöllerG (1993) Amor y Juego: Fundamentos Olvidados de Lo Humano. Santiago de Chile: Ramsan.
NedelskyJ (1989) Reconceiving Autonomy.Yale Journal of Law and Feminism1(1): 7.
30.
NedelskyJ (2011) Law’s Relations a Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy, and Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
RicœurP (2005) The Course of Recognition. Institute for Human Sciences Vienna Lecture Series. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
RosaH (2019) Resonance: A Sociology of Pur Relationship to the World. Translated by James Wagner.Cambridge, UK and Medford, OR: Polity Press.
33.
SandlerR (2017) Environmental virtue ethics: Value, normativity, and right action. In: GardinerSMThompsonA (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
SearleJR (2004) Mind : A Brief Introduction.Fundamentals of Philosophy Series.New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
SenA (2007) Identity and Violence : The Illusion of Destiny. Taschenbuch-Ausgabe. Issues of Our Time.New York: W.W. Norton.
36.
TaylorC (1989) Sources of the Self : The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
TaylorC (1994) Justice after virtue. In: HortonJMendusS (eds) In After MacIntyre, Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge: Polity Press.
38.
TurnerNJMathewsD (2020) Serving nature: Completing the ecosystem services circle. In: BaiHChangDScottC (eds) In A Book of Ecological Virtues : Living Well in the Anthropocene. Regina, Saskatchewan: University of Regina Press.
39.
VerbeekPde WaalFBM (2002) The primate relationship with nature: Biophilia as a general pattern. In: KahnPHKellertSR (eds) Children and Nature Psychological, Sociocultural, and Evolutionary Investigations. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: The MIT Press.
40.
WarrenKJ (2000) Ecofeminist Philosophy : A Western Perspective on What It Is and Why It Matters. Studies in Social & Political Philosophy.Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
