There are two distinct strands within modern philosophical ethics that are relevant to environmental philosophy: an empiricist strand that seeks a naturalist account of human conduct and a humanist strand rooted in a conception of transcendent human freedom. Each strand has its appeal, but each also raises both strategic and theoretical problems for environmental philosophers. Based on a reading of Kant's critical solution to the antinomy of freedom and nature, I recommend that environmental philosophers consider the possibility of a Darwinian humanism, through which moral agents are understood as both free and causally intertwined with the natural world.
ArnhartLarry. 1995. ‘The New Darwinian Naturalism in Political Theory’. American Political Science Review, 89(2): 389–400.
2.
BeckLewis White. 1960. A Commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BerryWendell. 1990. What Are People For?San Fransisco: North Point Press.
4.
CallicottJ. Baird. 1989. In Defense of the Land Ethic. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
5.
DarwinCharles. 1980. Metaphysics, Materialism, and the Evolution of Mind: Early Writings of Charles Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
DarwinCharles. 1981. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (facsimile of first edn). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7.
DennettDaniel C.1995. Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon and Schuster.
8.
DennettDaniel C.2004. Freedom Evolves. New York: Penguin.
9.
FerryLuc. 1992. The New Ecological Order (VolkC., trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
GoodpasterKenneth E.1978. ‘On Being Morally Considerable’. Journal of Philosophy, 75(6): 308–25.
11.
HardinGarrett. 1968. ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’. Science, 162(3859): 1243–8.
12.
HinchmanLewis P.2004. ‘Is Environmentalism a Humanism?’ Environmental Values, 13: 3–29.
13.
HumeDavid. 1975. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals (Third edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
HumeDavid. 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature (Second edn). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
15.
HusserlEdmund. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology (CarrD., trans.). Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
16.
KantImmanuel. 1958. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals (PatonH. J., trans.). New York: Harper Torchbooks.
17.
KantImmanuel. 1965. Critique of Pure Reason (SmithN. K., trans.). New York: St. Martins Press.
18.
KantImmanuel. 1993. Critique of Practical Reason (BeckL. W., trans. Third edn). New York: Macmillan/Library of Liberal Arts.
19.
KirkmanRobert. 2002a. Skeptical Environmentalism: The Limits of Philosophy and Science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
20.
KirkmanRobert. 2002b. ‘Through the Looking-Glass: Environmentalism and the Problem of Freedom’. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 36: 27–41.
21.
KirkmanRobert. 2004. ‘The Ethics of Metropolitan Growth: A Framework’. Philosophy and Geography, 7(2): 201–18.
22.
LeopoldAldo. 1949. A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Merleau-PontyMaurice. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible (LingisA., trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
24.
RousseauJean-Jacques. 1986. The First and Second Discourses (GourevitchV., trans.). New York: Harper and Row.
25.
SmithAdam. 2004. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. New York: Barnes and Noble Publishing.
26.
WilsonEdward O.1998. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage.
