This paper offers a critical examination of efforts to use Heidegger's thought to illuminate deep ecology. It argues that deep ecology does not entail a non-anthropocentric or ecocentric environmental ethic; rather, it is best understood as offering an ontological critique of the current environmental crisis, from a perspective of deep anthropocentrism.
BiemelW., 1977. Martin Heidegger. Translated by MehtaJ. L. (London:Routledge & Kegan Paul).
2.
Des JardinsJ., 2001. Environmental Ethics. (Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning).
3.
DreyfusH.1993. ‘Heidegger on the Connection Between Nihilism, Art, Technology, and Politics’, in The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, ed. GuignonC. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
4.
EckersleyR., 1998. ‘Beyond Human Racism’, Environmental Values7: 165–82.
5.
FredeD.1993. ‘The Question of Being: Heidegger's Project’, in The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, ed. GuignonC. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 42–6.
6.
FoxW., 1984. ‘Deep Ecology: A New Philosophy of our Time?’ The Ecologistvol. 14, no. 5–6.
7.
GreyW., 1993. ‘Anthropocentrism and Deep Ecology’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy71: 463–75
8.
HayP., 2002. Main Currents in Western Environmental Thought. (Sydney: University of New South Wales Press).
9.
HaywardT., 1997. ‘Anthropocentrism: A Misunderstood Problem’, Environmental Values6: 49–63.
10.
HeideggerM., 1962. Being and Time. Translated by MacquarrieJ. and RobinsonE. (London: SCM Press Ltd.).
11.
HeideggerM., 1978. ‘Letter on Humanism’, in Basic Writings. Translated by CapuzziF. with GrayJ. Glen, edited by KrellD. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
12.
KatzE.2000. ‘Against the Inevitability of Anthropocentrism’, in Beneath the Surface, ed. KatzE., LightA. and RothenburgD. (Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press): 17–42.
13.
LynchT.1996. ‘Deep Ecology as an Aesthetic Movement’, Environmental Values5: 147–60.
14.
LynchT. and WellsD., 1998. ‘Non-Anthropocentrism? A Killing Objection’, Environmental Values7: 151–63.
NaessA., 1973. ‘The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement’, Inquiry16: 95–100.
17.
NagelT., 1979. ‘Subjective and Objective’, in Mortal Questions. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
18.
NagelT.1986. The View From Nowhere(New York: Oxford University Press).
19.
RoutleyR. and RoutleyV., 1979. ‘Against the Inevitability of Human Chauvinism’, in GoodpasterK. and SayerK. (eds), Ethics and Problems of the 21st Century. (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).
20.
SteversonB., 1996. ‘On the Reconciliation of Anthropocentric and Nonanthropocentric Environmental Ethics’, Environmental Values5: 349–61.
21.
TaylorC.1992. ‘Heidegger, Language, and Ecology’, in Heidegger: A Critical Reader(Cambridge: Blackwell).
22.
ThieleL., 1995. ‘Nature and Freedom: A Heideggerian Critique of Biocentric and Sociocentric Environmentalism’, Environmental Ethics17: 171–90.
23.
WigginsD., 1987. ‘Claims of Need’, in Needs, Values, Truth. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
24.
WilliamsB., 1992. ‘Must a Concern for the Environment be Centred on Human Beings?’ In TaylorC.C.W. (ed.), Ethics and the Environment(Oxford: Corpus Christi College).
25.
ZimmermanM.1983. ‘Toward a Heideggerian Ethos for Radical Environmentalism’, Environmental Ethics5: 99–131.
26.
ZimmermanM., 1986. ‘Implications of Heidegger's Thought for Deep Ecology’, Modern Schoolman54: 19–43.
27.
ZimmermanM., 1993. ‘Rethinking the Heidegger–Deep Ecology Relationship’, Environmental Ethics15: 195–224.
28.
ZimmermanM., 1994. Contesting Earth's Future: Radical Ecology and Postmodernity. (Berkeley: University of California Press).
29.
ZimmermanM., 2000. ‘Possible Problems of Earth-Based Religiosity’, in KatzE., LightA. and RothenburgD. (eds) Beneath the Surface. (Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 2000).
